Article In: Gesture: Online-First Articles
Phonological working memory but not beat gestures affect L2 word stress perception
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Acquiring second language (L2) prosody, specifically stress, is
challenging for learners. While beat gestures reinforce prosodic cues in a native language
(L1), their role in L2 stress perception and its interaction with cognitive individual
differences is underexplored. This study investigates if beat gestures facilitate L2
stress perception and how this relates to learners’ visuospatial, phonological, and
executive working memory (WM). Twenty-four native Dutch speakers completed an L2 Stress
Perception Task. Mixed-effects modeling revealed that participants with better
phonological WM showed higher stress identification accuracy, corroborating its importance
in L2 acquisition. However, no benefit of beat gestures was found for either stress
identification accuracy or reaction times. Executive and visuospatial WM showed no main
effects, nor did any of the WM components interact with the gesture condition. Our
findings highlight the importance of incorporating cognitive individual difference
measures, as they may have a greater impact than the gesture effect itself.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Word stress
- Beat gestures
- Working memory
- The Phonological/Executive model
- Working memory in multimodal and L2 stress processing
- The present study
- Methods
- Participants
- Materials
- L2 Stress perception task
- Task design
- Stimulus words
- Stimulus videos
- Working memory tests
- L2 Stress perception task
- Procedure
- Statistical analysis
- Data preprocessing
- Mixed-effects modeling
- Accuracy
- Reaction times
- Results
- Descriptives
- Mixed-effects models
- Accuracy
- Reaction times
- Discussion
- Beat gestures did not enhance L2 Spanish stress perception
- No interaction between gesture condition and working memory
- Stress perception benefited from PWM
- Limitations
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (64)
Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study [Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Delaware]. Retrieved January 24, 2024, from [URL]
Arvaniti, A. (2020). The phonetics of prosody. In A. Arvaniti (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–89, Vol. 8). Academic Press.
Baills, F., & Prieto, P. (2021). Embodying rhythmic properties of a foreign language through hand-clapping helps children to better pronounce words. Language Teaching Research, 136216882098671.
Baills, F., Zhang, Y., & Prieto, P. (2018). Hand-clapping to the rhythm of newly learned words improves L2 pronunciation: Evidence from Catalan and Chinese learners of French. Speech Prosody 2018, 498–502.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Bosker, H. R., & Peeters, D. (2021). Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1943), 20202419.
Bujok, R., Maran, M., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2025). Beat gestures facilitate lexical access in constraining sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
Bujok, R., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2024). Audiovisual perception of lexical stress: Beat gestures and articulatory cues. Language and Speech, 68(1), 181–203.
Cocks, N., Morgan, G., & Kita, S. (2011). Iconic gesture and speech integration in younger and older adults. Gesture, 11(1), 24–39.
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C.-L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72.
de Bree, E. H. (2007). Dyslexia and phonology: A study of the phonological abilities of Dutch children at-risk of dyslexia. LOT, 155. [URL]
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2008). Individual differences in second language learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Wiley.
Gluhareva, D., & Prieto, P. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 609–631.
Hoetjes, M., & van Maastricht, L. (2020). Using gesture to facilitate L2 phoneme acquisition: The importance of gesture and phoneme complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575032.
Honbolygó, F., Kóbor, A., & Csépe, V. (2019). Cognitive components of foreign word stress processing difficulty in speakers of a native language with non-contrastive stress. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 366–380.
Hummel, K. M. (2009). Aptitude, phonological memory, and second language proficiency in nonnovice adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30(2), 225–249.
Jackson, D. O. (2020). Working memory and second language development: A complex, dynamic future? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 89–109. [URL].
Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 67(4), 793–808.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44(2), 137–166.
Kelly, S. D., & Lee, A. L. (2012). When actions speak too much louder than words: Hand gestures disrupt word learning when phonetic demands are high. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 793–807.
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2007). The effects of visual beats on prosodic prominence: Acoustic analyses, auditory perception and visual perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 396–414.
Leonard, T., & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–1471.
Li, P., Baills, F., & Prieto, P. (2020). Observing and producing durational hand gestures facilitates the pronunciation of novel vowel-length contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(5), 1015–1039.
Li, S. (2019). Six decades of language aptitude research. In Z. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude (pp. 78–96). Routledge.
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883.
Llanes-Coromina, J., Prieto, P., & Rohrer, P. L. (2018). Brief training with rhythmic beat gestures helps L2 pronunciation in a reading aloud task. Speech Prosody 2018, 498–502.
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., & Lüdecke, D. (2021). Automated results reporting as a practical tool to improve reproducibility and methodological best practices adoption. CRAN. [URL]
Mora, J. C., & Darcy, I. (2023). Individual differences in attention control and the processing of phonological contrasts in a second language. Phonetica, 80(3–4), 153–184.
Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc. (2024a). Presentation Cognitive Experiments III v3. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from [URL]
. (2024b). Presentation Cognitive Experiments IV v2. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from [URL]
Özer, D., & Göksun, T. (2020). Visual-spatial and verbal abilities differentially affect processing of gestural vs. spoken expressions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 896–914.
Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 602–619.
Posit Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Posit Software, PBC. Boston, MA. [URL]
Pouw, W., de Jonge-Hoekstra, L., Harrison, S. J., Paxton, A., & Dixon, J. A. (2021). Gesture–speech physics in fluent speech and rhythmic upper limb movements. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1491(1), 89–105.
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63(4), 772–783.
Rohrer, P. L., Bujok, R., van Maastricht, L., & Bosker, H. R. (2024). The timing of beat gestures affects lexical stress perception in Spanish. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024.
Rohrer, P. L., Bujok, R., Van Maastricht, L., & Bosker, H. R. (2025). From “I dance” to “she danced” with a flick of the hands: Audiovisual stress perception in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Sabourin, L., Leclerc, J.-C., Lapierre, M., Burkholder, M., & Brien, C. (2016). The language background questionnaires in L2 research: Teasing apart the variables. In L. Hracs (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. Retrieved April 1, 2024, from [URL]
Schubotz, L., Holler, J., Drijvers, L., & Özyürek, A. (2021). Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension. Psychological Research, 85(5), 1997–2011.
Schwab, S., Giroud, N., Meyer, M., & Dellwo, V. (2020). Working memory and not acoustic sensitivity is related to stress processing ability in a foreign language: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 55, 100897.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. Routledge. Retrieved December 20, 2020, from [URL]
Stepanov, A., Kodrič, K. B., & Stateva, P. (2020). The role of working memory in children’s ability for prosodic discrimination. PloS One, 15(3), e0229857.
Thompson, L. A. (1995). Encoding and memory for visible speech and gestures: A comparison between young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 215–228.
Thompson, L. A., & Guzman, F. A. (1999). Some limits on encoding visible speech and gestures using a dichotic shadowing task. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 54(6), P347–9.
Thomson, R. (2022). The relationship between L2 speech perception and production. In T. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro & R. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 370–385). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
van Maastricht, L., Hoetjes, M., & van Drie, E. (2019a). Do gestures during training facilitate L2 lexical stress acquisition by Dutch learners of Spanish? Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Auditory-Visual Speech Processing (AVSP2019). Retrieved May 29, 2023, from [URL].
van Maastricht, L., Hoetjes, M., & van der Heijden, L. (2022). Learning L2 Prosody using Gestures: The role of individual differences related to musicality. Speech Prosody 2022, 718–722.
van Maastricht, L., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2016a). Native speaker perceptions of (non)native prominence patterns: Effects of deviance in pitch accent distributions on accentedness, comprehensibility, intelligibility, and nativeness. Speech Communication, 83, 21–33.
(2016b). Prominence patterns in a second language: Intonational transfer from Dutch to Spanish and vice versa. Language Learning, 66(1), 124–158.
van Maastricht, L., Krahmer, E., Swerts, M., & Prieto, P. (2019b). Learning direction matters: A study on L2 rhythm acquisition by Dutch learners of Spanish and Spanish learners of Dutch. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 87–121.
van Maastricht, L., Zee, T., Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2021). The interplay of prosodic cues in the l2: How intonation, rhythm, and speech rate in speech by Spanish learners of Dutch contribute to l1 Dutch perceptions of accentedness and comprehensibility. Speech Communication, 133, 81–90.
Wen, Z. (2019). Working memory as language aptitude: The Phonological/Executive Model. In Z. Wen, P. Skehan, A. Biedroń, S. Li & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Language aptitude (pp. 187–214). Routledge.
(2023). Phonological and executive working memory. In Z. Wen, A. Biedroń & R. L. Sparks (Eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language acquisition (pp. 97–124). De Gruyter Mouton.
Wen, Z., Juffs, A., & Winke, P. (2020). Measuring working memory. In P. Winke & T. Brunfaut (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing (pp. 167–176). Routledge.
Wen, Z., & Li, S. (2019). Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In J. W. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 365–389). Cambridge University Press.
Wen, Z., Skehan, P., Biedroń, A., Li, S., & Sparks, R. L. (Eds.). (2019). Language aptitude. Routledge.
Woods, D. L., Kishiyamaa, M. M., Lund, E. W., Herron, T. J., Edwards, B., Poliva, O., Hink, R. F., & Reed, B. (2011). Improving digit span assessment of short-term verbal memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1), 101–111.
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2014). Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory. Acta Psychologica, 153, 39–50.
Wu, Y. C., Müller, H. M., & Coulson, S. (2022). Visuospatial working memory and understanding co-speech iconic gestures: Do gestures help to paint a mental picture? Discourse Processes, 59(4), 275–297.