Cover not available

In:Way expressions: A lexical-constructional approach
Seizi Iwata
[Human Cognitive Processing 84] 2027
► pp. 393–402

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Ackema, P., & Schoorlemmer, M. (1994). The middle construction and the syntax — semantics interface. Lingua, 93, 59–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Middles and nonmovement. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 173–197.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adams, V. (2001). Complex words in English. Pearson Education/Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, K. (2017). The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages (pp. 39–60). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akita, K., & Matsumoto, Y. (2020). A fine-grained analysis of manner salience: Experimental evidence from Japanese and English. In Y. Matsumoto & K. Kawachi (Eds.), Broader perspectives on motion event descriptions (pp. 143–179). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alsina, A., Bresnan, J., & Sells, P. (1996). Complex predicates: structure and theory. In A. Alsina, J. Bresnan, & P. Sells (Eds.), Complex predicates (pp. 1–12). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asudeh, A., Dalrymple, M., & Toivonen, I. (2008). Constructions with lexical integrity: Templates as the lexicon-syntax interface. In M. Butt, & T. Holloway-King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference (pp. 68–88). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Constructions with lexical integrity. Journal of Language Modelling, 1, 1–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ausensi, J. (2022). Unaccusativity and the way-construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 43, 41–69.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ausensi, J., Smith, R. W., & Yu, J. (2024). On the expression of resultativity in English: The view from multiple resultatives. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 9, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J. (2006). Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 39–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C., & Culy, C. (1992). Nominal control of misplaced modifiers. CLS, 28, General Session, 42–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, J., & Koontz-Garboden, A. (2017). Result verbs, scalar change, and the typology of motion verbs. Language, 93, 842–876. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. (1999). Covert modality in non-finite contexts [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2003). A constructional approach to resultatives. CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Cognitive construction grammar. In T. Hoffman, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 233–252). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2025). What happened to Frame Semantics? English Linguistics 41, 1–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Changes in argument structure: The transitivizing reaction object construction. Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, T., & Hoffmann, T. (2020). The way construction in World Englishes. English World-Wide, 41, 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christie, E. (2011). Investigating the differences between the English way-construction and the fake reflexive resultative construction. Actes du congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne de linguistique 2011. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–64). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copley, B., & Harley, H. (2015). A force-theoretic framework for event structure. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38, 103–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1998). Event structure in argument linking. In M. Butt, & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 21–63). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K-U Panther (Eds.), Motivation in language (pp. 49–68). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., Barðdal, J., Hollmann, W., Sotirova, V., & Taoka, C. (2010). Revisiting Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In H. Boas (Ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (pp. 201–235). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Vigus, M. (2020). Event causation and force dynamics in argument structure constructions. In E. Bar-Asher Siegal & N. Boneh (Eds.), Perspectives on causation: Selected papers from the Jerusalem 2017 workshop (pp. 151–183). Basel: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, A. (1973). Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 8, 11–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, P., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Kim, J-B. (2019). Historical shifts with the into-causative construction in American English. Linguistics, 57, 29–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. (1984). Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language, 8, 181–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, I. (2014). Modals and lexically-regulated saturation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 160–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2011). Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewell, R. B. (2004). The semantics of be-verb constructions and the German locative alternation. Leuvense Bijdragen, 93, 15–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirven, R. (1982). ‘Talk’: Linguistic action perspectivized as discourse. In R. Dirven, L. Goossens, Y. Putseys, & E. Vorlat (Eds.), The scene of linguistic action and its perspectivization by speak, talk, say and tell (pp. 37–83). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, D. R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eitelmann, M., & Mondorf. B. (2018). The role of cognate objects in language variation and change. In R. Finkbeiner, & U. Freywald (Eds.), Exact repetition in grammar and discourse (pp. 200–230). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagan, S. (1992). The syntax and semantics of middle constructions: A study with special reference to German. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, T. (2018). A construction of independent means: The history of the way construction revisited. English Language and Linguistics. Published online April 23, 2018.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1986). On the middle construction in English. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Purpose verbs. In J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (pp. 371–384). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1977). Topics in lexical semantics. In R. Cole (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 76–138). Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. J. Jarvella, & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 31–59). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. BLS, 12, 95–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Valency issues in FrameNet. In T. Herbst, & K. Götz-Votteler (Eds.), Valency: Theoretical, descriptive, and cognitive issues (pp. 129–160). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C., Lee-Goldman, R., & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet constructicon. In H. C. Boas, & I. Sag (Eds.), Sign-based construction grammar (pp. 309–372). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. Taishukan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geuder, W., & Weisgerber, M. (2008). Manner of movement and the conceptualisation of force. Slides of talk given at Journée d’étude “Il y a manière et manière.” Université d’Artois, Arras, March 28, 2008.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A., & Staraki, E. (2013). Ability, action, and causation: From pure ability to force. In A. Mari, C. Beyssade, & F. Del Prete (Eds.), Genericity (pp. 250–275). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Ackerman, F. (2001). The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language, 77, 798–814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2004). The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language, 80, 532–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacquard, V. (2009). On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32, 279–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Actuality entailments. In D. Gutzmann, L Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann, & T. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics Vol. 1 (pp. 1–26). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1987). A view from the middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers, 10. Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, R. A., Jr. (1973). The transferred epithet in P. G. Wodehouse. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 92–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höche, S. (2009). Cognate object constructions in English: A cognitive-linguistic account. Gunter Narr Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, T. (2022). Construction grammar: The structure of English. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Homer, V. (2011). French modals and perfective: A case of aspectual coercion. In M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 106–114). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huumo, T. (2018). Moving along paths in space and time. Journal of Linguistics, 54, 721–751. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. (1996). The way constructions grow. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 217–230). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iwata, S. (1998). A lexical network approach to verbal semantics. Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999a). Thematic parallels and non-parallels: Contributions of field-specific properties. Studia Linguistica, 53, 68–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b). On the status of implicit argument in middles. Journal of Linguistics, 35, 527–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). He jumped to his feet: Internal motion and internal path. Tsukuba English Studies 22: A festschrift in honor of Minoru Nakau, 89–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005a). Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning. Cognitive Linguistics, 16: 355–407. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). The role of verb meaning in locative alternations. In M. Fried & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp. 101–118). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Argument resultatives and adjunct resultatives in a lexical constructional account: The case of resultatives with adjectival result phrases. Language Sciences, 28, 449–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Eat one’s way: A lexical-constructional account. Paper read at the Fifth International Conference on the Linguistics of Contemporary English. University of Texas, Austin.
(2014). Construction grammar. In A. Carnie, Y. Sato, & D. Siddiqi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax (pp. 647–669). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). ‘State-maintaining’ causatives: A close kin to resultatives. Language Sciences, 64, 103–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Two types of find one’s way: A lexical-constructional account. Paper read at Constructional Semantics: Cognitive, Functional and Typological Approaches. University of Helsinki, Finland.
(2023a). A force-dynamic account of way expressions. Plenary talk given at English Linguistics Society of Korea Spring Conference 2023 (video participation).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023b). Way expressions and force dynamics. Plenary talk given at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association, J. F. Oberlin University, Machida campus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2025). The manner of cutting revisited. Constructions and Frames, 17, 236–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002a). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002b). English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In N. Dehe, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-particle explorations (pp. 67–94). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1927). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part III Syntax, second volume. Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1949). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Volume 7: Syntax. Ejnar MunksgaardGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageyama, T., & Yumoto, Y. (1997). Gokeisei to gainen kouzou (Word formation and conceptual structure). Kenkyusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1971). Implicative verbs. Language, 47, 340–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P. (2005). Argument structure constructions and the argument — adjunct distinction. In M. Fried & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp. 71–98). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, K. (2000). Semantics. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J., & Roeper, T. (1984). On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 381–416.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J-B., & Davies, M. (2016). The into-causative construction in English: A construction-based perspective. English Language and Linguistics, 20, 55–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirchner, G. (1951). A special case of the object of result. English Studies, 32, 153–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987a). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987b). Nouns and verbs. Language, 63, 53–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005a). Integration, grammaticisation, and constructional meaning. In M. Fried, & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots (pp. 157–189). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 101–159). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leclercq, B., & Depraetere, I. (2021). Making meaning with be able to: Modality and actualization. English Language and Linguistics, 26, 27–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2025). An unusual English resultative construction. In C. O’Shannessy, J. Gray, & D. Angelo (Eds.), Projecting voices: Studies in language and linguistics in honour of Jane Simpson, Asia-Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rapoport, T. (1988). Lexical subordination. CLS, 24, 275–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995) Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Lexical semantics and syntactic structure. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 487–507), Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Two structures for compositionally derived events. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, IX: 199–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In B. Arsenijević, B. Gehrke, & R. Marín (Eds.), Studies in the composition and decomposition of event predicates (pp. 49–70). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, T., & Stickles, E. (2017). Gestural modality and addressee perspective influence how we reason about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28, 45–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindner, S. (1981). A lexico-semantic analysis of verb-particle constructions with up and out [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, San Diego. Available from IULC (1983).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). What goes up doesn’t necessarily come down: The ins and outs of opposites. CLS, 18, 305–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1975). The Wodehouse effect. English Studies, 56, 245–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1992). The way-construction and the semantics of direct arguments in English: A reply to Jackendoff. In T. Stowell, & E. Wehrli (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 26: Syntax and the lexicon (pp. 179–188). Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mari, A. (2016). Actuality entailments: When the modality is in the presupposition. Lecture Notes In Computer Science (pp. 191–210), 2016. ([URL]) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1996a). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 183–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996b). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, language, and discourse (pp. 359–374). CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. (1982). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner, & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–324). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. (2003). Word meaning, sentence meaning, and syntactic meaning. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (pp. 163–210). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 1–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, A. (1990). On the distribution of bare infinitive complements in English. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 103–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, A., Huddleston, R., & Collins, P. (2002). The clause: Adjuncts. In R. Huddleston, & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 663–784). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondorf, B. (2011). Variation and change in English resultative constructions. Language Variation and Change, 22, 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Snake legs it to freedom: Dummy it as pseudo-object. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 12, 73–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of front in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 759–776. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. (1978). English manner-of-speaking verbs revisited. Papers from the Parasession on the Lexicon, CLS: 278–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nadathur, P. (2023). Actuality inferences: Causality, aspect, and modality. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakajima, H. (2005). Semantic compositionality of the way-construction. In H. Herausgegeben, V. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huijbregts, U. Kleinhenz, & J. Koster (Eds.) Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (pp. 439–446). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norvig, P., & Lakoff, G. (1987). Taking: A study in lexical network theory. BLS, 13, 195–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. (1979). The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 3, 143–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12, 109–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Deferred interpretation. In L. R. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 344–364). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perek, F. (2018). Recent change in the productivity and schematicity of the way-construction: A distributional semantic analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14, 65–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Productivity and schematicity in constructional change. In L. Sommerer, & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes and networks in diachronic construction grammar (pp. 141–166). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K., & Huddleston, R. (2002). Adjectives and adverbs. In R. Huddleston, & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 526–595). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. (2014). Lexical content and context: The causative alternation in English revisited. Lingua, 141, 8–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (2001). An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 77, 766–797. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rice, S. (1987). Towards a cognitive model of transitivity [Doctoral dissertation]. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivière, C. (1982). Objectionable objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 685–689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubio Vallejo, D. (2017). Actuality effects as conversational implicatures. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 44–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., & Michaelis, L. (2014). Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English. In S. K. Bourns, & L. L. Myers (Eds.), Perspective on linguistic structure and context: Studies in honor of Knud Lambrecht (pp. 57–108). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salkoff, M. (1988). Analysis by fusion. Lingvisticoe Investigationes, 12, 49–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2012). Two types of external argument licensing — The case of causers. Studia Linguistica, 66, 128–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, J. (1983). Resultatives. In M. Rappaport, A. Zaenen, & L. Levin (Eds.), Papers in lexical-functional grammar (pp. 143–157). Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerer, L., & Van de Velde, F. (2025). Constructional networks. In M. Fried & K. Nikiforidou (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of construction grammar (pp. 220–245), Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczesniak, K. (2013). You can’t cry your way to candy: Motion events and paths in the x’s way construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 24, 159–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol.1, Concept structuring systems. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000b). Toward a cognitive semantics: Vol.2, Typology and process in concept structuring. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tenny, C. (1987). Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness [Doctoral dissertation]. MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2003). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 18, 523–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2008). Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate construction in English. In G. Trousdale & N. Gisborne (Eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar (pp. 33–67). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, J. (2010). A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics, 14, 399–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics, 49, 295–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandeloise, C. (1990). Representation, prototypes, and centrality. In S. L. Tshohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp. 403–437). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Leek, F. (1996). The English conative construction: A compositional account. CLS, 32, Main Session, 363–378.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Caused-motion and the ‘bottom-up’ role of grammar. In A. Foolen, & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 301–331). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. In Linguistics in philosophy, Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, G. (2004). Equatives and deferred reference. Language, 80, 262–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willich, A. (2022). Introducing Construction Semantics (CxS): A frame-semantic extension of Construction Grammar and constructicography. Linguistics Vanguard 8, 139–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P. (2003). Direct causation in the linguistic coding and individuation of causal events. Cognition, 88, 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, P., Jen, G-H., Klettke, B., & Li, Y. (2010). Force creation and possible causers across languages. In B. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 93–110). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1971). In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 223–233.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sources
Coben, H. (2024). Think twice. Century.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connelly, M. (2010). The reversal. Vision.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crais, R. (1999). L.A. requiem. Orion Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, L. (2020). The guest list. Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, E. S. (1940). The case of the baited hook. Ballantine Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionaries
COBUILD9: Collings COBUILD Advanced Learner’s English Dictionary, ninth edition (2018) Harper Collins Publishers.
LDOCE3:Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, third edition (1995), Longman.
LDOCE6: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, sixth edition (2014), Longman.
Macmillan English Dictionary (2002), Macmillan Publishers.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue