Cover not available

Article In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Exploring emojis through corpus linguistic approaches

A cross-industry comparison of webcare communication

ORCiD logo with link | Vienna University of Economics and Business
ORCiD logo with link | Birmingham City University
ORCiD logo with link | Birmingham City University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Businesses increasingly interact with stakeholders through various digital media channels: a process known as webcare. Although emojis are widely used in webcare, they have not been explored extensively in this context and, as most corpus software cannot process visual modes of expression, their use has not been studied at scale using a corpus linguistic methodology. In this article, we present the results of a large-scale data-driven analysis of emoji use in the US Corporate Twitter Corpus (UCTC), comprising 4.4 million tweets posted by and addressed to US companies across three industries. Through frequency and collocational analyses, we explore the different functions of emojis in the UCTC, with a focus on disambiguating their use in tweets serving different webcare goals. While our study thus offers new insights into the use of emojis in webcare communication, it also demonstrates how they can be studied by adapting well established corpus linguistic methods.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Webcare and the use of emojis
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Airlines
    • 4.2Food and beverage
    • 4.3Streaming services
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (49)
References
Arya, V., Sethi, D., & Verma, H. (2018). Are emojis fascinating brand value more than textual language? Mediating role of brand communication to SNS and brand attachment: An insight from India. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 648–670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2221). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casado-Molina, A. M., Mercedes Rojas-de Gracia, M., Alarcón-Urbistondo, P., & Romero-Charneco, M. (2022). Exploring the opportunities of the emojis in brand communication: The case of the beer industry. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(3), 315–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, L. C., & Platt, W. (2025). Keywords and key emoji: Investigating a university’s Twitter posts before, during and after COVID-related restrictions. Corpora, 20(2), 205–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creen, K., & Latiolais, L. G. (2023). Tone enhancement in business communications: A case for the emoji. Internal Auditing, 38(5), 26–36. [URL]
Crijns, H., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., & Claeys, A.-S. (2017). How to deal with online consumer comments during a crisis? The impact of personalized organizational responses on organizational reputation. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 619–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniel, J. (n.d.). The most frequently used emoji of 2021. Unicode.org. [URL]
Das, G., Wiener, H. J. D., & Kareklas, I. (2019). To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. Journal of Business Research, 96, 147–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijkmans, C., Kerkhof, P., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015). A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation. Tourism Management, 47, 58–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duffett, R. G., & Maraule, M. (2024). Customer engagement and intention to purchase attitudes of generation Z consumers toward emojis in digital marketing communications. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 25(5), 607–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duong, T. (2026, March 11). Most popular social networks worldwide as of October 2025, by number of monthly active users (in millions). Statista. [URL]
Erle, T. M., Schmid, K., Goslar, S. H., & Martin, J. D. (2022). Emojis as social information in digital communication. Emotion, 22(7), 1529–1543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Explosion (2023). spacymoji v3.1.0. GitHub. [URL]
Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Van Landeghem, S., & Boyd, A. (2020). spaCy: Industrial-strength natural language processing in Python. Zenodo.org. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishida, R. (2016, February 6). Who uses Unicode? World Wide Web Consortium. [URL]
Javornik, A., Filieri, R., & Gumann, R. (2020). “Don’t forget that others are watching, too!” The effect of Conversational Human Voice and reply length on observers’ perceptions of complaint handling in social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 50, 100–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 172–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, T., & Wurster, K. (2025). emoji v.2.15.0. GitHub. [URL]
Koch, T., Denner, N., Crispin, M., & Hohagen, T. (2023). Funny but not credible? Why using (many) emojis decreases message credibility and source trustworthiness. Social Media and Society, 9(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazzeretti, C. (2023). Exploring the use of emoji in museum social network sites. Discourse, Context & Media, 53, 100697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, E. (2022, August 11). Coca-Cola’s newest flavor ‘Dreamworld’ supposedly tastes like dreams. NBC News. [URL]
Li, X., Wa Chan, K., & Kim, S. (2019). Service with emoticons: How customers interpret employee use of emoticons in online service encounters. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 973–987. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liebrecht, C., Tsaousi, C., & Van Hooijdonk, C. (2021). Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 124–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Logi, L., & Zappavigna, M. (2023). A social semiotic perspective on emoji: How emoji and language interact to make meaning in digital messages. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3222–3246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, U. (2021). The Discourse of customer service tweets: Planes, trains and automated text analysis. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2026). Studying webcare across industries: From customer care to relationship management. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 6(1), 100175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. (2017). Identifying informational norms in Mumsnet talk: A reflexive-linguistic approach to internet research ethics. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 293–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald’s. (2021, March 16). 10 fun facts you probably didn’t know about the Shamrock Shake®. McDonalds.com. [URL]
McShane, L., Pancer, E., Poole, M., & Deng, Q. (2021). Emoji, playfulness, and brand engagement on Twitter. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53(1), 96–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Research and Development Unit for English Studies. (2025). WebCorp Learn [Computer software]. Birmingham City University. [URL]
. (2026). UCTC-emojis. GitHub. [URL]
Seargeant, P. (2019). The Emoji revolution. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Statista Research Department (2025, October 22). Leading countries based on number of X (formerly Twitter) users as of October 2025 (in millions). Statista. [URL]
Su, Q., Gu, C., & Liu, P. (2024). Association measures for collocation extraction: Automatic evaluation on a large-scale corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(1), 59–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tauch, C., & Kanjo, E. (2016). The roles of emojis in mobile phone notifications. UbiComp ’16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct, 1560–1565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Coca-Cola Company. (2023). 2022 Business & sustainability report: Refresh the world. Make a difference. [URL]
Twitter Inc. (2022). Twemoji 14.0.2. GitHub. [URL]
Valenzuela-Gálvez, E. S., Garrido-Morgado, Á., & González-Benito, Ó. (2022). Boost your email marketing campaign! Emojis as visual stimuli to influence customer engagement. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 337–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Noort, G., & Willemsen, L. M. (2012). Online damage control: The effects of proactive versus reactive webcare interventions in consumer-generated and brand-generated platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(3), 131–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Noort, G., Willemsen, L. M., Kerkhof, P., & Verhoeven, J. (2015). Webcare as an integrative tool for customer care, reputation management, and online marketing: A literature review. In P. J. Kitchen, & E. Uzunoğlu (Eds.), Integrated communications in the postmodern era (pp. 77–99). Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verheijen, L., & Liebrecht, C. (2025). How emoji in company responses to online consumer complaints affect observers: Emoji as visual signalling cues in webcare. International Journal of Business Communication, Online First. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, G., Mitchell, V.-W., Jackson, P. R., & Beatty, S. E. (2009). Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective. British Journal of Management, 20, 187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weitzl, W. J., & Einwiller, S. A. (2020). Profiling (un-)committed online complainants: Their characteristics and post-webcare reactions. Journal of Business Research, 117, 740–753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willemsen, L., Neijens, P. C., & Bronner, F. A. (2013). Webcare as customer relationship and reputation management? Motives for negative electronic word of mouth and their effect on webcare receptiveness. In S. Rosengren, M. Dahlén, & S. Okazaki (Eds.), Advances in advertising research (Vol. IV): The changing roles of advertising (pp. 55–69). Springer Gabler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, M., & Logi, L. (2024). Emoji and social media paralanguage. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue