Article In: International Journal of Learner Corpus Research: Online-First Articles
The contributions of L1 speaking style and L2 proficiency to L2 fluency
A corpus-based study on Chinese learners of English
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study examined the contributions of first language (L1) speaking style, second language (L2) proficiency, and their interaction to different dimensions of L2 fluency among adult Mandarin-speaking learners of English. Forty-one learners completed comparable speaking tasks in both Mandarin and English. Multiple regression analyses revealed that L1 speaking style significantly predicted a wide range of L2 fluency measures, including articulation rate, pausing behavior, and repetition frequency, indicating substantial cross-language association in fluency performance. L2 proficiency emerged as a significant predictor of nearly all fluency measures, suggesting that fluency is shaped not only by stable individual speaking tendencies but also by developing linguistic abilities. Interaction effects were not significant for all measures. These findings highlight the joint contribution of stable individual speaking style and proficiency-driven processing efficiency to L2 fluency and underscore the importance of accounting for L1 fluency in L2 fluency research.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.State of the art
- 2.1Definition and understanding of fluency
- 2.2Operationalizing utterance fluency
- 2.3Relationships between L1 and L2 fluency and between L2 fluency and proficiency
- 3.Database and methodology
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Data collection and task description
- 3.3Data processing
- 3.4Statistical analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Descriptive statistics
- 4.2Predicting L2 fluency across dimensions
- 4.2.1Speed fluency
- 4.2.2Breakdown fluency
- 4.2.3Repair fluency
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- AI use disclosure statement
- Data availability statement
- Author queries
References
References (49)
Aas, H. L., & Rørvik, S. (2022). Exploring the use of repeats in learners’ native and interlanguage production. In A. Leńko-Szymańska, & S. Götz (Eds.), Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research. John Benjamins.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 2862–2873.
De Jong, N. H., & Bosker, H. R. (2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In R. Eklund (Ed.), The 6th workshop on disfluency in spontaneous speech (DiSS) (pp. 17–20).
De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223–243.
De Jong, N. H., & Mora, J. C. (2019). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 227–239.
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency (pp. 121–142). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533–557.
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.
Dewaele, J. M., & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 355–365.
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 349–385.
Duran-Karaoz, Z., & Tavakoli, P. (2020). Predicting L2 fluency from L1 fluency behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42, 671–695.
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26.
Gao, J., & Sun, P. P. (2023). To correct or not: The role of L1 fluency in understanding and measuring L2 fluency. TESOL Quarterly, 57, 643–655.
(2024). How does learners’ L2 utterance fluency relate to their L1? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34, 276–291.
Google (2025). Turn speech into text using Google AI. Google Cloud: Cloud Speech-To-Text. [URL]
Götz, S. (2013). Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2019a). Do learning context variables have an effect on learners’ (dis)fluency? Language-specific vs. universal patterns in advanced learners’ use of filled pauses. In L. Degand, G. Gilquin, L. Meurant, & A. C. Simon (Eds.), Fluency and disfluency across languages and language varieties (pp. 177–196). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
(2019b). Filled pauses across proficiency levels, L1s and learning context variables: A multivariate exploration of the Trinity Lancaster Corpus Sample. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5, 159–180.
Gráf, T. (2019). Speech rate revisited. In S. Götz & J. Mikherjee (Eds.), Studies in corpus linguistics (pp. 175–189). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gries, S. T. (2021). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Mouton textbook (3rd ed.). de Gruyter Mouton.
Gut, U. (2009). Non-native speech: A corpus-based analysis of phonological and phonetic properties of L2 English and German (Vol. 9). Peter Lang.
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In F. K. Alex Housen & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency (pp. 1–20). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Huensch, A. (2023). Effects of speaking task and proficiency on the midclause pausing characteristics of L1 and L2 speech from the same speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45, 1031–1055.
Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2017). Understanding second language fluency behavior: The effects of individual differences in first language fluency, cross-linguistic differences, and proficiency over time. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 755–785.
Hunter, J. D. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95.
Jiránková, L., Gráf, T., Kvítková, A., Banýrová, M., Novotná, A., & Sedláček, M. (2019). On the relation between L1 and L2 speech rate. A. Abel, A. Glazniek, V. Lyding, & L. Nicolas (Eds.), Widening the scope of learner corpus research: Selected papers from the Fourth Learner Corpus Research Conference. Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64, 809–854.
(2020). Explaining second language utterance fluency: Contribution of cognitive fluency and first language utterance fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41, 457–480.
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32, 145–164.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach∗. Language Learning, 40, 387–417.
Neary-Sundquist, C. (2013). Task type effects on pragmatic marker use by learners at varying proficiency levels. L2 Journal, 5, 1–21.
Peltonen, P. (2018). Exploring connections between first and second language fluency: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal, 102, 676–692.
Peltonen, P., Götz, S., & Lintunen, P. (2025). The impact of L1 speaking style, task mode, and L2 proficiency on L2 fluency: A within-subject study of monologic and dialogic speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 47, 1328–1348.
Peltonen, P., & Lintunen, P. (2022). Multilingual speakers’ L1, L2, and L3 fluency across languages: A study of Finnish, Swedish, and English. Nordand, 17, 48–63.
Peltonen, P., Olkkonen, S., Szyszka, M., & Lintunen, P. (2025). L2 repair fluency through the lenses of L1 repair fluency, cognitive fluency, and language anxiety. Applied Linguistics Review, 16, 877–899.
Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 497–526.
Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. (2026). statsmodels (Version 0.15.0) [Computer software]. [URL]
Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2024). The moderating role of L2 proficiency in the predictive power of L1 fluency on L2 utterance fluency. Language Testing, 42, 73–99.
Tavakoli, P., & Foster, P. (2008). Task design and second language performance: The effect of narrative type on learner output. Language Learning, 58, 439–473.
Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A. M. (2020). Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104, 169–191.
Tree, J. E. F. (1995). The effects of false starts and repetitions on the processing of subsequent words in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 709–738.
Williams, S. A., & Korko, M. (2019). Pause behavior within reformulations and the proficiency level of second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 723–742.
Wright, C. (2020). Effects of task type on L2 Mandarin fluency development. Journal of Second Language Studies, 3, 157–179.