Cover not available

Article In: International Journal of Learner Corpus Research: Online-First Articles

How task types shape lexical sophistication in L2 learner writing

ORCiD logo with link | University of NevadaReno
ORCiD logo with link | University of Bojnord
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of writing task type on lexical sophistication in second language (L2) writing. A total of 70 English as a Second Language (ESL) learners at a large US university completed four writing tasks (descriptive, narrative, expository, and argumentative), producing 280 writing samples as part of their curriculum. The texts were analyzed using lexical sophistication indices capturing word- and n-gram-based frequency and range, psycholinguistic properties, and semantic relations. Results showed that academic words were more frequent in argumentative and narrative writing than in descriptive and expository tasks, whereas the range of academic words, bigrams, and trigrams was higher in expository and narrative texts. Argumentative essays used words with lower familiarity, imageability, and meaningfulness values, reflecting less common and less associatively rich vocabulary. Descriptive and narrative essays showed higher polysemy values than argumentative and expository texts. Overall, task type produced selective effects across dimensions of lexical sophistication, highlighting implications for L2 writing research and pedagogy.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of literature
    • 2.1Lexical sophistication as a multifaceted construct
    • 2.2The role of task types in L2 writing
  • 3.The current study
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Writing tasks
    • 4.3Procedure
    • 4.4The lexical sophistication indices
    • 4.5Data analysis
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Descriptive patterns of lexical sophistication
    • 5.2Inferential Analysis: Linear Mixed-Effects Models
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Lexical frequency and range
    • 6.2Psycholinguistic properties of lexical items
    • 6.3Semantic depth
    • 6.4Interpreting small but systematic task effects on lexical deployment
  • 7.Conclusion: Implications, limitations, and future research directions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Data availability statement
  • AI use statement
  • Note
  • References
References (51)
References
Abdi Tabari, M., & Golparvar, S. E. (2025). Understanding task-specific emotions in L2 writing: The influence of task repetition and task rehearsal across proficiency levels. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 1982–1995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abdi Tabari, M., Lee, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Capturing linguistic features of writing in two genres over time. Reading and Writing, 37(3), 787–809. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abdi Tabari, M., Liang, X., & Albert, Á. (2025). The influence of task type and learner language background on writing production and anxiety: A Bayesian linear mixed-effects analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abdi Tabari, M., Lu, X., & Hu, R. (2025). The effects of task complexity and task repetition on sense-aware frequency-based lexical sophistication indices in L2 writing. Language Teaching Research. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abdi Tabari, M., Lu, X., & Wang, Y. (2023). The effects of task complexity on lexical complexity in L2 writing: An exploratory study. System, 114, 103021. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abdi Tabari, M., Wang, Y., & Miller, M. (2024). Understanding the SSARC model of task sequencing: Assessing L2 writing development. Assessing Writing, 62, 100893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abolhasani, H., Golparvar, S. E., & Robatjazi, M. A. (2022). Modelling the role of L2 writing anxiety in graph-based composing performance and strategy use. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(2), 417–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexopoulou, T., Michel, M., Murakami, A., & Meurers, D. (2017). Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning, 67(S1), 180–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT® test: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS Research Report Series, 2013(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2014). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, V. A. (2021). An Introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 23–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 147–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caltabellotta, E., Van Steendam, E., Noreillie, A. S., Puimège, E., Creten, S., & Peters, E. (2025). Vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary use in writing: A cross-sectional comparison of L2 English and L2 French. Applied Linguistics, amaf009. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Approaches and perspectives on teaching vocabulary for discipline-specific academic writing. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.), Discipline-specific writing (pp. 62–76). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. (2012). Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 115–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., Zhao, H., & Finlayson, N. (2025). Tracking the development in second language writers’ use of academic vocabulary in discipline-specific assignments. Journal of Second Language Writing, 69, 101217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. [URL]
Durrant, P. (2014). Discipline and level specificity in university students’ written vocabulary. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 328–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P., Dirdal, H., & Tveitan, V. D. (2025). Vocabulary sophistication in children’s L2 school writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 11(1), 17–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K. (2020). Continuing to explore the multidimensional nature of lexical sophistication: The case of oral proficiency interviews. Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 381–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2018). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy, and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., & Abdi Tabari, M. (2024). Linguistic complexity in second language writing: Insight from studies on task planning. Language Teaching, 58(1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, M., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2018). Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 120–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köylü, Z., Eryilmaz, N., & Perez-Vidal, C. (2023). A dynamic usage-based analysis of L2 written complexity development of sojourners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 101002. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K. (2020). Lexis. In M. Paquot & S. Th. Granger (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and corpora (pp. 332–344). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A. (2015). Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 757–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, C., & Polio, J. (2017). Written language learning. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 299–318). NewYork: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2020). Defining and assessing lexical proficiency (1st ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, X., & Hu, R. (2021). Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality. Behavior Research Methods, 54(3), 1444–1460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M., Murakami, A., Alexopoulou, T., & Meurers, D. (2019). Effects of task type on morphosyntactic complexity across proficiency. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 124–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monteiro, K. R., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K. (2020). In search of new benchmarks: Using L2 lexical frequency and contextual diversity indices to assess second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 41(2), 280–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M., König, A., Stemle, E. W., & Frey, J. C. (2024). The core metadata schema for learner corpora (LC-meta). International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 10(2), 280–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, M., & Naets, H. (2024). Phraseological sophistication as a multidimensional construct. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 11(1), 217–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rokoszewska, K. (2026). Variability and variation in L2 writing: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1941). Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika, 6(5), 309–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2011). Genre-based tasks in foreign language writing: Developing writers’ genre awareness, linguistic knowledge, and writing competence. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 111–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue