Article In: International Journal of Language and Culture: Online-First Articles
The flower of the throat
Cultural metaphorical embodiment in the Zo’é language
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article analyses metaphorical and metonymic expressions in the Zo’é
language, with an emphasis on constructions related to parts of the human body. Examples
of lexicalized metaphors and metonymies are examined, considering their morphological and
morphosyntactic formation, as well as their respective pragmatic uses. The theoretical
framework is grounded in the cultural dimensions of the metaphorical embodiment process
(Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I. (Eds.). (2014). The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment. Brill. ; Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor
in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press. ; (Ed.). (2020). Body
part terms in conceptualization and language usage. John Benjamins. ; Maalej, Z. A., & Yu, N. (Eds.). (2011). Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures. John Benjamins. ; Yu, N. (2009). From
body to meaning in culture: Papers on cognitive semantic studies of Chinese. John Benjamins. ). The study seeks to
contribute with the Zo’é data to the question “which metaphors, or which aspects of
metaphorical knowledge emerge from the interaction between a common body schema and a
shared physical world, and which arise from culturally specific bodily experiences,
carried out in a particular natural and social environment. The research corpus was
compiled from the Linguistic Support Manual for Health Care Services for the Zo’é
People (Cabral, A. S. A. C., Jennings, E., & Pinto, S. B. (2019). Manual
linguístico de apoio ao atendimento de saúde junto ao povo
Zo’é. LALLI.) and the
Manual of Semiological Questions in the Zo’é Language (Cabral &
Sompré, in preparation). These data enabled the identification of metaphorical and
metonymic patterns and mechanisms through which speakers of the Zo’é language name and
conceptualize human body parts, thereby revealing the underlying conceptual mapping
patterns involved.
Keywords: Zo’é language, Tupí-Guaraní family, metaphor, metonymy, body parts
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Some notes on the Zo’é and their language
- 1.2Typological characteristics of Zo’é
- 1.3Methodology
- 2.Cultural metaphorical embodiment
- 2.1The human body as an object of metaphorical conceptualization in the Zo’é language
- 2.2The human body as a source domain for conceptualization processes in the Zo’é language
- 3.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
- Author queries
References
References (34)
Brenzinger, M., & Kraska-Szlenk, I. (Eds.). (2014). The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment. Brill.
Cabral, A. S. A. C. (1996a). Algumas
evidências lingüísticas de parentesco genético do Jo’é com as línguas
Tupí-Guaraní. Moara, (4), 47–76.
(2007). As
categorias nome e verbo em Zo’é. In A. S. A. C. Cabral & A. D. Rodrigues (Eds.), Línguas
e culturas
Tupí (Vol. I1, pp. 241–257). LALLI.
(2023). Quando
a ordem dos constituintes em Zo’é é pragmaticamente
motivada. In É. A. Fragoso, Q. F. Camargos, & S. da S. Facundes (Eds.), Conhecimento,
ensino e política de línguas na
Amazônia (pp. 25–53). Pontes.
Cabral, A. S. A. C., Jennings, E., & Pinto, S. B. (2019). Manual
linguístico de apoio ao atendimento de saúde junto ao povo
Zo’é. LALLI.
Cravens, T. D. (1982). The
origin of “testa” as “head” in Romance. Neuphilologische
Mitteilungen, 83(1), 53–60.
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations
of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes [Doctoral
dissertation, University of California, Berkeley].
Haarmann, H. (1986). Language
in ethnicity: A view of basic ecological relations. Mouton de Gruyter.
(2014). The
body in language: Observations from grammaticalization. In M. Brenzinger & I. Kraska-Szlenk (Eds.), The
body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic
embodiment (pp. 13–32). Brill.
(2013). The
Metaphor–Metonymy Relationship: Correlation Metaphors Are Based on Metonymy. Metaphor and
Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.
Kluge, F. (2002). Etymologisches
Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (E. Seebold, Ed.; 24th
ed.). De Gruyter. (Original work published
1872).
Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). Semantics
of body part terms: General trends and a case study of Swahili. LINCOM Europa.
(Ed.). (2020). Body
part terms in conceptualization and language usage. John Benjamins.
Maalej, Z. A., & Yu, N. (Eds.). (2011). Embodiment
via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures. John Benjamins.
Pasch, H. (2020). Body-part
terms as a linguistic topic and the relevance of body-parts as
tools. In I. Kraska-Szlenk (Ed.), Body
part terms in conceptualization and language
usage (pp. 52–75). John Benjamins.
Peña-Cervel, M. S., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2022). Figurative
thought and language. John Benjamins.
Rodrigues, A. D. (2010). Estrutura
da língua Tupinambá. In A. S. A. C. Cabral, A. D. Rodrigues, & F. B. Duarte (Eds.), Línguas
e culturas Tupí
II (pp. 11–42). LALLI/Universidade de Brasília. (Original work published 1981).
Rodrigues, A. D., & Cabral, A. S. A. C. (2002). Revendo
a classificação interna da família Tupí-Guaraní. In A. S. A. C. Cabral & A. D. Rodrigues (Eds.), Línguas
indígenas brasileiras: fonologia, gramática e
história (Vol. 11, pp. 327–337). EDUFPA.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Pérez Hernández, L. (2011). The
contemporary theory of metaphor: Myths, developments and challenges. Metaphor and
Symbol, 26(3), 161–185.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy
of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical
categories in Australian
languages (pp. 112–172). Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Survival
Brasil. (2025). Zo’é. [URL]
Yu, N. (2009). From
body to meaning in culture: Papers on cognitive semantic studies of Chinese. John Benjamins.