In:Migration, Language, and Policy Discourse: Bridging the gap between policymaking and language assessment
Laura Schildt
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 59] 2026
► pp. xiii–xiv
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
List of figures
Figure 1.1Migration Language Testing (MLT) interface
Figure 1.2Research design
Figure 1.3Structure of the book
Figure 3.1Ricento and Hornberger’s (1996) ‘onion model’
Figure 3.2Johnson and Johnson’s (2015) adapted ‘onion model’
Figure 3.3Spolsky’s (2004) Language policy model
Figure 3.4Shohamy’s (2006) ideology-mechanism-practice
Figure 3.5Jernudd and Das Gupta’s (1971) language planning model
Figure 3.6Policy cycle (Lasswell, 1956), source publication
(Banha et al., 2022)
(Banha et al., 2022)
Figure 3.7Dialogue structures (Scholten et al., 2015)
Figure 5.1Language tester institutions
Figure 6.1Identity navigation framework
Figure 6.2Natalie brings hand to forehead
Figure 6.3Natalie moves hand away from forehead
in a frontal movement
in a frontal movement
Figure 6.4Modes of engagement
Figure 7.1Linguistic communities of Belgium (Luminet et al., 2012)
Figure 7.2Timeline of integration language policy
Figure 8.1The multiple streams framework
Figure 8.2The responsibility-regulation matrix
Figure 9.1Rationales for Flemish language testing policy
Figure 10.1Constraints on collaborations
