Article In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication: Online-First Articles
Mitigating or mediatising extranational conflicts?
A critical analysis of news discourse on the India‑China dialogue
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
In 2024, India and China engaged in a series of conflict-resolution measures and dialogues, garnering prime news space.
With the historical-ongoing conflict over the border and contest over economics between India and China considerably determining the
political dynamics of at the least Asia, it becomes imperative to analyse how the news media framed the latest bilateral events between
these powerful Asian giants and identify whether the news discourse represented peace and conflict resolution from a positive-pacifist
standpoint or was (hyper) critical about unresolved or emerging contentious issues — displaying a lack of trust, exposing deceptive
duplicity and expressing fears or concerns. To analyse the popular online news discourse on India-China ties and bilateral developments
during August-November 2024, a corpus of news text was created from 200 online news articles and examined using a mixed-method research
approach. A qualitative thematic analysis identified four primary editorial themes (i.e., political offensive, economic sanction, diplomatic
dialogue, and economic affirmation) that represent the open (news) codes, and four compound secondary news codes (i.e., conflict, political
pressure, economic manoeuvre, and cooperation) that point to two overarching news discourses: amiable and adversarial. Based on this
analysis and the identification of the themes, a quantitative analysis of the actual sample was performed for frequency and relationship
tests. Furthermore, the study examined the news types and sources quoted in them to associate them with the identified discursive
themes.
Keywords: India, China, conflict, mediatisation, media framing, news discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Mediatisation of conflict
- 3.Framing analysis of news discourse
- 4.The case under study
- 5.Research method
- 5.1Sampling
- 5.2Coding for reliability
- 6.Thematic analysis
- 6.1Amiable discourse
- 6.1.1Highlighting the need and intention to resolve conflict
- 6.1.2Identifying and appreciating pro-peace efforts
- 6.1.3Offering hope about conflict resolution
- 6.1.4Posting progress
- 6.2Adversarial discourse
- 6.2.1Recognition of uncordiality
- 6.2.2Incongruence in political action
- 6.2.3Violent confrontations
- 6.2.4Caution after conflict
- 6.2.5Contest and competence
- 6.2.6Deception point
- 6.2.7Implicit economic checks
- 6.2.8Cultivation of control
- 6.2.9Insecurity about intrusions
- 6.1Amiable discourse
- 7.Framing analysis
- 8.Discussion
- 9.Conclusion
- AI statement
References
References (80)
Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing
theory in communication research: Origins, development and current situation in Spain. Revista Latina de
Comunicación
Social, 70, 423–450.
Barclay, F. P., & Jan, S. A. (2025). Pulwama
attack hypercoverage: The discursive struggle. In F. P. Barclay, K. A. Laskar & B. Natrayan (Eds.), Media
and conflict: Critical analysis of news discourses in
India (pp. 27–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
Barclay, F. P., Laskar, K. A., & Boobalakrishnan, N. (Eds.). (2025). Media
and conflict: Critical analysis of news discourses in India. Palgrave Macmillan.
Barclay, F. P., Laskar, K. A., Karippara, M. S., & Harilal, H. (2025). Social
protests and news discourse: Stories we live by. In F. P. Barclay, K. A. Laskar, & B. Natrayan (Eds.), Media
and conflict: Critical analysis of news discourses in
India (pp. 87–102). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bharti, M. S. (2024). China–India
border disputes: An analytical analysis of Doklam standoff to Tawang clash. Asian Journal of Political
Science, 33(2), 428–448.
Bhonsale, M. (2018). Understanding
Sino-Indian border issues: An analysis of incidents reported in the Indian media (ORF Occasional Paper No.
143). Observer Research Foundation.
Boukes, M. (2022). Episodic
and thematic framing effects on the attribution of responsibility: The effects of personalized and contextualized news on perceptions of
individual and political responsibility for causing the economic crisis. The International Journal of
Press/Politics, 27(2), 374–395.
Brown, D. K., & Mourão, R. R. (2021). Protest
coverage matters: How media framing and visual communication affects support for Black civil rights
protests. Mass Communication and
Society, 24(4), 576–596.
Chen, C., & Liu, R. (2024). “China-India
Border Clash”: Construction of event newsworthiness and discrepancies in Chinese and Indian news
discourse. Sage
Open, 14(4), 1–17.
De Michelis, S. (2018, December 23). Peace
journalism in theory and practice. E-International Relations.
Divya, A. (2024, October 3). President
Murmu writes to Xi, underlines stable & peaceful relations. The Indian Express. [URL]
Entman, R. M. (2010). Framing
media power. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing
news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical
perspectives (pp. 331–355). Routledge.
Eskjær, M. F., Hjarvard, S., & Mortensen, M. (2015). The dynamics of mediatized conflicts. Peter Lang.
Express News
Service. (2024, November 3). Some progress,
opens possibility for other steps: Jaishankar on India-China disengagement. The Indian
Express. [URL]
Farias Cordeiro, D., Lopezosa, C., Guallar, J., & Vállez, M. (2024). Analysis
of Google news coverage: A comparative study of Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Portugal, and
Spain. Contratexto, (42), 177–208.
Galtung, J. (2006). Peace
journalism as an ethical challenge. Global Media Journal: Mediterranean
Edition, 1(2), 1–5.
(2015). Peace
journalism and reporting on the United States. The Brown Journal of World
Affairs, 22(1), 321–333.
Gao, Q., & Feng, D. (2025). Deploying
large language models for discourse studies: An exploration of automated analysis of media attitudes. PLOS
ONE, 20(1), e0313932.
Giles, D., & Shaw, R. L. (2009). The
psychology of news influence and the development of media framing analysis. Social and Personality
Psychology
Compass, 3(4), 375–393.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame
analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Gojree, M. U. (2013). India
and China: Prospects and challenges. International Research Journal of Social
Sciences, 2(8), 48–54.
Golčevski, N., von Engelhardt, J., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2013). Facing
the past: Media framing of war crimes in post-conflict Serbia. Media, War &
Conflict, 6(2), 117–133.
Greene, K. T., Tornquist, C., Fokkink, R., Lindelauf, R., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2021). Understanding
the timing of Chinese border incursions into India. Humanities and Social Sciences
Communications, 8(1), 1–8.
Haidar, S. (2024, October 21). Reached
agreement with China on LAC patrolling, resolution of friction points: India. The
Hindu. [URL]
Herzog, C., & Kelly, P. (2023). Applying
thematic analysis to analyse press coverage in cross-country comparative research: A qualitative study
protocol. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 22, 1–6.
Hjarvard, S., Mortensen, M., & Eskjær, M. F. (2015). Introduction:
Three dynamics of mediatized conflicts. In M. F. Eskjær, S. Hjarvard & M. Mortensen (Eds.), The
dynamics of mediatized
conflicts (pp. 1–27). Peter Lang.
HT
Editorial. (2024, September 13). Real thaw with
China still far. Hindustan Times. [URL]
HT News
Desk. (2024, September 10). Kiren Rijiju
refutes reports of Chinese encroachment in Arunachal Pradesh: ‘Mere painting of marks in...’ Hindustan
Times. [URL]
. (2024, September 11). In US,
Rahul Gandhi claims Chinese troops occupied land the size of Delhi in Ladakh: ‘A disaster’. Hindustan
Times. [URL]
. (2024, October 28). India, China to
complete military disengagement today: Here’s what it means. Hindustan Times. [URL]
Indurthy, R. (2016). India
and China: Conflict, competition, cooperation, and prospects for peace. International Journal on World
Peace, 33(1), 43–108.
Jan, S. A., & Barclay, F. P. (2023). War
or peace discourse? Analysis of news headlines on Pulwama attack. Peace and Conflict
Studies, 30(1), Article
4.
(2024). Does
political distance spur populist reportage? Media framing of a geopolitical conflict. Asian Journal of
Political
Science, 32(2), 117–137.
(2025). Conflict
and conflicting news discourses: An analysis of newspaper coverage of Pulwama attack. Journalism
Practice, 19(5), 1091–1109.
Ji, D., Hu, Z., & Muhammad, Y. (2016). Neighboring
competitor? Indian image in Chinese media. Global Media and
China, 1(3), 234–250.
Kaushik, K., & Wang, E. (2024, October 23). BRICS
Summit: China and India should manage differences, Xi tells Modi. Reuters. [URL]
Khan, Z., Bhat, S., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Unravelling
the complexities of the India-China border conflict: A comprehensive analysis. Shodhkosh: Journal of Visual
and Performing
Arts, 5(1), 748–762.
Kumar, A. (2010). Future
of India-China relations: Challenges and prospects. Revista
UNISCI, (24), 187–196.
Kumar, B. (2024, September 30). India
to stay on high alert at LAC despite progress with China. Here’s why. Business
Standard. [URL]
Laurie, J., & Thompson, M. (2025). Fossil-fueled
stories: An ecolinguistic critical discourse analysis of the South African government’s naturalisation of fossil fuels in the context of
the climate crisis. Critical Discourse
Studies, 22(6), 589–607.
Lu, Y. (2007). Looking
beyond the border: The Sino-Indian border dispute and Sino-Indian relations. Heidelberg Papers in South
Asian and Comparative Politics, (31).
Lynch, J., & Galtung, J. (2010). Reporting
conflict: New directions in peace journalism. University of Queensland Press.
Lynch, J., & McGoldrick, A. (2005). Peace
journalism: A global dialog for democracy and democratic media. In R. A. Hackett & Y. Zhao (Eds.), Democratizing
global media: One world, many
struggles (pp. 269–288). Rowman & Littlefield.
(2007). Peace
journalism. In C. Webel & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook
of peace and conflict
studies (pp. 248–264). Routledge.
Malone, D. M., & Mukherjee, R. (2010). India
and China: Conflict and
cooperation. Survival, 52(1), 137–158.
Mansingh, S. (2005). Perceptions
and India–China relations at the end of the colonial era. In B. R. Deepak (Ed.), India
and China in the colonial world (p. 224). Primus Books.
Matthes, J. (2009). What’s
in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals,
1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367.
Ministry of External
Affairs. (2024, August 29). 31st Meeting of the
Working Mechanism for Consultation & Coordination on India-China Border Affairs. Government of
India. [URL]
Mishra, S. K. (2016). The
colonial origins of territorial disputes in South Asia. Journal of Territorial and Maritime
Studies, 3(2), 5–22.
Narlikar, A. (2019). Regional
powers’ rise and impact on international conflict and negotiation: China and India as global and regional
players. Global
Policy, 10(1), 22–28.
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media
framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science
Review, 91(3), 567–583.
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing
analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political
Communication, 10(1), 55–75.
Pathak, S. (2024, August 1). Why
China excluded India from the 5th China-South Asia Forum. Hindustan Times. [URL]
Peri, D. (2024, October 6). How
are tanks armouring the Ladakh sector? The Hindu. [URL]
Potter, P. B. (2003). Belief
in control: Regulation of religion in China. The China
Quarterly, 174, 317–337.
Press Trust of
India. (2024, August 1). Prez Xi urges hi-tech
smart system usage to boost China’s border defence. Business Standard. [URL]
Qiao, S., Fang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, R., Li, X., & Kang, Y. (2025). Generative
AI for thematic analysis in a maternal health study: Coding semistructured interviews using large language
models. Applied Psychology: Health and
Well-Being, 17(3), e70038.
Roach, M. (2023). The China-India land border conflict: A qualitative case study of the China-India border dispute from a realistic perspective [Bachelor’s thesis, Linnaeus University]. DiVA.
Schemer, C., Wirth, W., & Matthes, J. (2012). Value
resonance and value framing effects on voting intentions in direct-democratic campaigns. American
Behavioral
Scientist, 56(3), 334–352.
Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting,
priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass
Communication and
Society, 3(2–3), 297–316.
Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The
state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of political
communication (pp. 619–632). Oxford University Press.
Sharma, S. (2024, September 19). New
Chinese heliport along LAC fuels tension with India. India Today. [URL]
(2024, October 21). India,
China agree to patrolling along LAC ‘leading to disengagement’. India Today. [URL]
Sidhu, W. P. S., & Yuan, J. D. (2003). China
and India: Cooperation or conflict?. India Research Press.
Singh, G. (2024, August 1). A
bridge that will drive India and China further apart. Deccan Herald. [URL]
Singh, N. (2024, September 18). China
builds new heliport near LAC, raising security concerns for India. Business Standard. [URL]
Sirohi, S. (2024, August 12). China
is mis-playing the relationship with India: Rush Doshi. The Economic Times. [URL]
Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2019). News
framing theory and research. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media
effects: Advances in theory and research (4th
ed., pp. 51–68). Routledge.
The Hindu
Bureau. (2024, August 1). India, China hold
30th round of border talks. The Hindu. [URL]
Tibetan
Review. (2024, August 2). China’s Pangong Tso
bridge in Tibet seen as meant to alter India-border status quo. Tibetan Review. [URL]
. (2024, August 14). China has
impoverished Tibetan villagers by force-relocating them as ‘border guardians.’ Tibetan
Review. [URL]
Vertzberger, Y. (1982). India’s
border conflict with China: A perceptual analysis. Journal of Contemporary
History, 17(4), 607–631.
Vladisavljević, N. (2015). Media
framing of political conflict: A review of the literature (MeCoDEM Working
Paper). Media, Conflict and Democratisation.
Vohra, A. (2024, December 27). India’s
border standoff with China has backed New Delhi into a corner. World Politics Review. [URL]
Ward, J. (2016). China-India
rivalry and the border war of 1962: PRC perspectives on the collapse of China-India
relations, 1958–62 (Doctoral
dissertation, University of Oxford). Oxford University Research Archive.
Ytreberg, E. (2002). Erving
Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. Critical Studies in Media
Communication, 19(4), 481–497.
Zhu, L. (2022). Framing
the political conflict discourse in Chinese media: A case study of Sino-US trade dispute. Journal of
Language and
Politics, 21(6), 867–889.