Article published In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication: Online-First Articles
Recontextualizing “new rural elite” in Chinese media
A diachronic corpus-assisted discourse study
Published online: 2 October 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.26042.cai
https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.26042.cai
Abstract
Based on China Daily reports from 2003 to 2025, this study uses correspondence analysis, co-occurrence
network analysis, and collocation analysis to trace the diachronic recontextualization of new rural elite discourse. The findings identify a
three-stage trajectory: conceptual emergence, governance construction, and strategic upgrading. Legitimation shifts from moral evaluation to
rationalization, later incorporating authorization. Meanwhile, the referential scope expands from general rural roles to diverse grassroots
elites and high-level talent, while the concept’s semantic status rises from concrete social actors to an institutional strategy. The new
rural elite is also redefined from an observed object to a thematically prominent policy actor, while its grammatical agency remains
discursively contained within state-directed governance frameworks. This process reveals a discourse-governance logic of incorporation,
integration, and guidance in China’s rural governance discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The new rural elite and critical discourse analysis
- 3.Theoretical framework
- 4.Data and method
- 4.1Data collection and corpus construction
- 4.2Analytical methods and procedures
- 4.3Coding reliability
- 5.Findings
- 5.1Correspondence analysis
- I.Period I (2003–2013)
- II.Period II (2014–2018)
- III.Period III (2019–2025)
- 5.2Co-occurrence network analysis
- I.Period I (2003–2013)
- II.Period II (2014–2018)
- III.Period III (2019–2025)
- 5.3Collocation analysis
- 5.3.1Verb collocates
- 5.3.2Adverb collocates
- 5.1Correspondence analysis
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
- AI Use Statement
References
References (37)
Andrus, J. (2011). Beyond
texts in context: Recontextualization and the co-production of texts and contexts in the legal discourse, excited utterance exception to
hearsay. Discourse &
Society, 22(2), 115–136.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A
useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum
seekers in the UK press. Discourse &
Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Boginskaya, O. (2022). Popularizing
in legal discourse: What efforts do Russian judges make to facilitate juror’s comprehension of law-related
contents? Discourse
Studies, 24(5), 527–544.
Cai, C. (2025). A
study of mediation discourse in the participation of the new rural elite in family conflicts involving the
elderly. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
Cai, C., & Hu, H. (2026). Mediation
discourse in safeguarding the rights of the elderly: A critical discourse analysis based on televised
mediation. International Journal of Conflict
Management, 37(3), 673–693.
Chen, J. (2025). An
analysis of the construction of a cultural discourse system for the new rural elite from the perspective of rural
revitalization. Journal of Shanxi Open
University, 30(5), 106–112.
Cody, S. (2019). “A
new consciousness of the countryside”? Elite ruralism in contemporary China. Asian
Anthropology, 18(1), 21–36.
Ekström, M. (2001). Politicians
interviewed on television news. Discourse &
Society, 12(5), 563–584.
Foucault, M. (1977). Language,
counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.
Fu, C. L. (2016). The
transformation, dilemmas, and new-rural-elite governance embedded in endogenous authority in China’s rural governance
model. Local Governance
Research, 17(1), 67–73.
Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. (2021). Legitimacy
revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. Journal of Management
Studies, 58(3), 749–781.
Hodges, A. (2008). The
politics of recontextualization: Discursive competition over claims of Iranian involvement in
Iraq. Discourse &
Society, 19(4), 483–505.
Huang, X., & Chen, J. (2024). Identity
crisis and reconstruction of the new rural elite in the new era. Grassroots Governance in
Sanjin, 4(3), 47–51.
Li, J. Z. (2017). Dilemmas
and pathways: Advancing contemporary rural governance through the new rural elite. Seeking
Truth, 29(6), 87–96.
Li, N., & Zheng, X. (2024). The
inner logic, dilemmas and paths of empowering rural cultural revitalization with rural elites
culture. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural
University, 18(5), 143–148.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching
dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins.
Liu, A. (2019). The
ethical value of the new rural elite in rural governance and its pathways of realization. Lanzhou Academic
Journal, 39(4), 165–172.
Liu, M. (2025). Recontextualizing
the basic law in South China Morning Post: A diachronic corpus-assisted discourse
study. International Journal of Legal
Discourse, 10(2), 283–304.
McNamara, T. (2012). Poststructuralism
and its challenges for applied linguistics. Applied
Linguistics, 33(5), 473–482.
Oh, D., & Shin, B. (2026). Historical
and Partisan shifts in Korean press representation of feminism (1990–2022): A keyness analysis and topic modeling
study. Journal of Asian Pacific
Communication, 36(1), 23–52.
Partington, A. (2010). Modern
diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the
project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108.
Savski, K. (2024). Language
policy from textuality to (re)entextualization: Expanding the toolkit for discursive analyses. Language
Policy, 23(1), 53–73.
Smith, G. (2015). Getting
ahead in rural China: The elite-cadre divide and its implications for rural governance. Journal of
Contemporary
China, 24(94), 594–612.
Sun, Z. (2018). On
the importance of recording and transmitting xiangxian culture in newly revised county gazetteers. China
Local
Records, 37(4), 25–31.
Tang, R. (2024). The
“new rural elite” injects strong momentum into rural revitalization. People’s
Tribune, 1, 26–29.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse
and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.
Wodak, R., & Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing
European higher education policies: The cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse
Studies, 7(1), 19–40.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods
of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Xu, Y., & Tu, Y. (2023). Xiangxian
culture in traditional society and its transformation in contemporary practice. Ethics
Studies, 20(6), 134–140.
Yan, C. (2019). Toward
the “new rural elite”: Breaking through the public-identity dilemma and reconstructing the role of rural
teachers. Education
Science, 35(4), 77–83.
Zhang, L., & Wu, D. (2017). Media
representations of China: A comparison of China Daily and Financial Times in reporting on the Belt and
Road Initiative. Critical
Arts, 31(6), 29–43.