Article In: Journal of English-Medium Instruction: Online-First Articles
Participation and student perceptions in EMI group discussions at a Japanese university
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper investigates participation during English as a lingua franca
(ELF) discussion tasks within English-medium instruction (EMI) classes at a Japanese
university and considers the potential impact of native speakerism on these interactions.
In some EMI settings in Japan, local ELF-speaking students study alongside international
exchange students, some of whom may be English as a native language (ENL) speakers. To
investigate such contexts, questionnaire responses were collected from local students
(N = 43) enrolled in an EMI lecture course. The responses indicated
that, despite some anxieties, local students were keen to communicate using ELF with ENL
speakers. Eight discussion task performances were video recorded, enabling micro-analysis
using Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press. participation framework
and the tools of conversation analysis. The data revealed that ENL speakers tended to
dominate the interactions. Throughout the dataset, ENL speakers adopted a teacher-like or
leader footing, while the local students seemed to relinquish control of key stages of the
task proceedings to the ENL speakers, often only contributing when directly asked, and
sometimes being silent. The local students appeared reluctant at times to challenge
factually inaccurate statements made by the ENL speakers. These findings highlight the
detrimental impact that native speakerism can have on student interactions in EMI.
Article outline
- Introduction
- EMI
- EMI in Japan
- Student interactions in EMI
- Purpose of the study
- Methods
- Context and participants
- Procedures
- Findings
- Questionnaires
- Task interaction analysis
- Quantitative token and turn analysis
- ENL speakers control the task proceedings
- ENL speakers demonstrate teacher-like footing
- ENL speakers’ communication with the teacher
- Repair conducted by ENL speakers
- ENL speakers dominate with extended turns
- Local student turns were minimal and reactive
- Local student activeness
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (48)
Aizawa, I., & McKinley, J. (2020). EMI challenges in Japan’s internationalization of higher education. In H. Bowles & A. C. Murphy (Eds.), English-medium instruction and the internationalization of universities (pp. 27–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
Akıncıoğlu, M. (2025). Reforming EMI in higher education: The EMI ProF as a political normative framework for policy, quality, and professionalisation. International Journal of Educational Development, 115, 1–10.
Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques. Jossey-Bass.
Bradford, A., & Brown, H. (2018). ROAD-MAPPING English-medium instruction in Japan. In A. Bradford & H. Brown (Eds.), English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education: Policy, challenges and outcomes (pp. 3–13). Multilingual Matters.
Brown, H. (2017). Why and why now? Understanding the rapid rise of English-medium instruction in higher education in Japan. Journal of International Studies and Regional Development, 8, 1–16.
Çağatay, S. (2015). Examining EFL students’ foreign language speaking anxiety: The case at a Turkish state university. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 648–656.
Carey, R. (2010). Hard to ignore: English native speakers in ELF research. Helsinki English Studies, 6, 88–101.
Colmenero, K., & Lasagabaster, D. (2024). Enclosing native speakerism: Students’, parents’, and teachers’ perceptions of language teachers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 85–100.
Crosby, A. (2024). The complexity of silence in Japanese classrooms: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Silence Studies in Education, 4(1), 13–25.
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction: A growing global phenomenon. British Council. [URL]
Doyon, P. (2000). Shyness in the Japanese EFL class: Why it is a problem, what it is, what causes it, and what to do about it. The Language Teacher, 24(1), 11–16.
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237–259.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323.
Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan. British Council. [URL]
Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020). The “internationalisation,” or “Englishisation,” of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80, 395–414.
Hardman, J. (2021). Pedagogic renewal: Promoting a dialogic pedagogy in the internationalised 21st-century higher education. In D. Dippold & M. Heron (Eds.), Meaningful teaching interaction at the internationalized university (pp. 2538). Routledge.
Hashimoto, H. (2018). Government policy driving English-medium instruction at Japanese universities: Responding to a competitiveness crisis in a globalizing world. In A. Bradford & H. Brown (Eds.), English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education (pp. 15–30). Multilingual Matters.
Heigham, J., & Walters, J. (2019, June 18). Enhancing communication in English-medium instruction. EAIE. [URL]
Hino, N. (2017). The significance of EMI for the learning of EIL in higher education: Four cases from Japan. In B. Fenton-Smith, P. Humphreys & I. Walkinshaw (Eds.), English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific (pp. 115–131). Springer.
(2018). Designing CELFIL (content and ELF integrated learning) for EMI classes in higher education. In K. Murata (Ed.), English-medium instruction from an English as a lingua franca perspective (pp. 219–238). Routledge.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
Huang, F. (2018). Foreign faculty at Japanese universities: Profiles and motivations. Higher Education Quarterly, 72(3), 237–249.
Jablonkai, R. R. (2023). Affordance of conversation analysis for investigating EMI classroom talk. In S. M. Curle & J. K. H. Pun (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in English medium instruction for emerging researchers: Theory and case studies of contemporary research (pp. 62–75). Routledge.
King, J. (2013). Silence in the second language classrooms of Japanese universities. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 325–343.
King, J., & Harumi, S. (Eds.). (2020). East Asian perspectives on silence in English language education. Multilingual Matters.
King, J., Yashima, T., Humphries, S., Aubrey, S., & Ikeda, M. (2020). Silence and anxiety in the English-medium classroom of Japanese universities: A longitudinal intervention study. In J. King & S. Harumi (Eds.), East Asian perspectives on silence in English language education (pp. 60–79). Multilingual Matters.
Lasagabaster, D. (2022). English-medium instruction in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Lee-Amuzie, G. (2025). Native-speakerism and multilingual student anxiety in one-to-one mentoring. The Writing Center Journal, 43(3), 11–27.
Leki, I. (2001). “A narrow thinking system”: Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39–67.
Llurda, E., & Calvet-Terré, J. (2024). Native-speakerism and non-native second language teachers: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 57, 229–245.
Macaro, E., & Aizawa, I. (2024). Who owns English medium instruction? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(10), 4037–4050.
Morizumi, F. (2015). EMI in Japan: Current status and its implications. Educational Studies, 57, 119–128.
NHK World-Japan. (2025, August 11). Enrollments below capacity at half of Japan’s private universities for 3rd year. NHK World-Japan. [URL]
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497–515.
Qiu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Transnational students’ epistemic participation in English-medium instruction programs. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6478.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Sohn, B., & Spiliotopoulos, V. (2021). Scaffolding peer interaction within a language-and-content integrated business curriculum: A case study in a western Canada university. In D. Dippold & M. Heron (Eds.), Meaningful teaching interaction at the internationalized university (pp. 80–96). Routledge.
Song, J. (2025). Who has the right to express frustration?: Uneven emotion labor among students in an EMI classroom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35, 996–1006.
Stroud, R. (2014). Investigating student group discussion participation. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings (pp. 404–412). JALT.
Suzuki, N. (2017). Foreign language speaking anxiety in the English-medium instruction (EMI) program in a Japanese university. Chugoku Chiku Eigo Kyoiku Gakkai Kenkyu Kiyo [Journal of the Chugoku District English Education Society Research Bulletin], 47, 11–21.