Article In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First Articles
Inside the echo chamber of online gender‑based hate speech
Discursive trivialization of intimate partner violence on social media in Bosnia and Herzegovina
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study examines the discursive construction of online gender-based
hate speech in Facebook comments responding to a news about intimate partner violence case
involving a female celebrity figure in the Balkans. It advances an interdisciplinary
mixed-methods framework combining Quantitative Content Analysis with Social Media Critical
Discourse Studies, Speech Act Theory, and Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Situating
gender-based hate speech within the sociotechnical dynamics of social media platforms, the
study investigates how affordances such as visibility, interaction, and likeability,
amplify and normalize hostility and aggression toward victims. Quantitative findings
reveal a marked predominance of male commenters and an overwhelming prevalence of
discourses legitimizing or trivializing violence, with mocking emerging as the dominant
speech-act pattern, followed by victim blaming. The analysis demonstrates how humorous and
ironic hostility operates as a subtle but powerful mechanism of online gender-based hate
speech, transforming the comment section into an echo chamber that trivializes the
violence. By combining discourse pragmatics with FCDA and SM-CDS, the study contributes to
research on gendered digital publics by showing how platform-mediated discourse functions
as a site of patriarchal moral regulation, where gender-based hate speech is normalized
and interactionally co-constructed. The relevance of the results is further enhanced by
the study’s focus on a less researched linguistic and cultural context. Although Bosnia
and Herzegovina, and Balkans more broadly, are characterized by deeply rooted patriarchal
norms, the discursive construction of these norms in online spaces remains significantly
underexplored.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Social media and online gender based hate speech
- 3.Key insights from previous research
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Data
- 4.2Theoretical framework
- 4.2.1Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS)
- 4.2.2Speech act theory
- 4.2.3Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
- 4.2.4Complementary analytical dimensions of SAT and FCDA
- 4.3Procedure of analysis
- 4.4Ethical considerations
- 5.Analysis and results
- 5.1Quantitative Content Analysis
- 5.2Speech act theory
- 5.2.1Justifying attitude
- 5.2.1.1Mocking/ridiculing the victim
- 5.2.1.2Judging/blaming the victim
- The choice of partner
- Immoral behavior
- Perceived professional outputs
- 5.2.1.3Justifying or praising the perpetrator
- 5.2.1.4Advocating or encouraging violence
- 5.2.1.5Critical attitude
- 5.2.1Justifying attitude
- 5.3Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis
- 6.Conclusion
- 7.Study limitations
- Notes
References
References (56)
Anderson, Ashton A., Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Peter Ladwig. 2014. “The ‘Nasty Effect’: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 373–387.
Bandura, Albert. 1978. “Social Learning Theory of Aggression.” Journal of Communication 28 (3): 12–29.
Banks, James. 2010. “Regulating Hate Speech Online.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 24 (3): 233–239.
Bates, Laura. 2021. Men Who Hate Women: From Incels to Pickup Artists, the Truth about Extreme Misogyny and How It Affects Us All. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
Bermek, Sila, Konstantinos Matakos, and Alper Unan. 2023. “Victim-Blaming Social Norms and Violence Against Women: Correcting Misperceptions or Morality Drive Policy and Behavior Change?” SSRN.
Bilewicz, Michał, and Wiktor Soral. 2020. “Hate Speech Epidemic: The Dynamic Effects of Derogatory Language on Intergroup Relations and Political Radicalization.” Political Psychology 41 (S1): 3–33.
BN Portal. 2020. “Ženu od sultana” pretukao momak, prijavila ga policiji. December 17. [URL]
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 226–248.
Boyd, Danah. 2010. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
Chadha, Kalyani, Linda Steiner, and Jessica Vitak. 2020. “Women’s Responses to Online Harassment.” International Journal of Communication 141: 239–257.
Cinelli, Matteo, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. 2021. “The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (9): e2023301118.
Christie, Nils. 1986. “The Ideal Victim.” In From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reorienting the Justice System, edited by Ezzat A. Fattah, 17–30. London: Macmillan.
Dennehy, Rebecca, Michelle Cronin, and Ella Arensman. 2020. “The Psychosocial Impacts of Cybervictimisation and Barriers to Seeking Social Support: Young People’s Perspectives.” Children and Youth Services Review 1111: 104872.
Dičić Kostić, Nevena, Eranda Danaj, Amina Čolak, and Sanja Vrbaški. 2022. Women’s Rights in Western Balkans. Stockholm: Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation.
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). n.d. “What Is Online Gender-Based Hate Speech?” [URL]
Esposito, Elena, and Sara Alba Zollo. 2021. “‘How Dare You Call Her a Pig, I Know Several Pigs Who Would Be Upset If They Knew’: A Multimodal Critical Discursive Approach to Online Misogyny against UK MPs on YouTube.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9 (1): 47–75.
Esposito, Elena. 2021. “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics, and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9 (1): 1–20.
Felson, Richard B., and Cynthia C. Palmore. 2021. “Traditionalism and Victim Blaming.” Journal of Social Psychology 161 (4): 492–507.
Hille, Sanne, and Piet Bakker. 2014. “Engaging the Social News User: Comments on News Sites and Facebook.” Journalism Practice 8 (5): 563–572.
Huesmann, L. Rowell, and Lucyna Kirwil. 2012. “Why Observing Violence Increases the Risk of Violent Behavior by the Observer.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression, edited by Daniel J. Flannery, Alexander T. Vazsonyi, and Irwin D. Waldman, 545–570. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iroegbu, Mmesoma, Fiona O’Brien, Laura C. Muñoz, and Genevieve Parsons. 2024. “Investigating the Psychological Impact of Cyber-Sexual Harassment.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 39 (15–16): 3424–3445.
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2017. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS).” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge.
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Elena Esposito. 2018. “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–68.
Kurtić, Ajdin. 2023. “Three Dead in Bosnia Shooting After Gunman Livestreams Woman’s Murder.” Balkan Insight, August 11. [URL]
Lazar, Michelle M. 2005. “Politicizing Gender in Discourse: Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis as Political Perspective and Praxis.” In Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse, edited by Michelle M. Lazar, 1–28. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2017. “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 372–387. London: Routledge.
Lazar, Michelle M., and Lijun Wan. 2022. “Remediatisation, Media Interdiscursivity and Ideological Ambivalence in Online News Reports on Sexual Assaults.” Discourse, Context & Media 481: 100620.
Lee, Eun-Ju, and Young Joon Jang. 2010. “What Do Others’ Reactions to News on Internet Portal Sites Tell Us? Effects of Presentation Format and Readers’ Need for Cognition on Reality Perception.” Communication Research 37 (6): 825–846.
Lewis, Ruth, Michael Rowe, and Clare Wiper. 2017. “Online Abuse of Feminists as an Emerging Form of Violence Against Women and Girls.” British Journal of Criminology 57 (6): 1462–1481.
López-Barranco, Patricia J., Sergio López-Yepes, María Belén Conesa-Ferrer, Pedro S. Cayuela-Fuentes, María del Mar Beladiez-Pérez, and Isabel Jiménez-Ruiz. 2025. “Violence Against Women on Social Networks: A Descriptive Analysis.” Healthcare 13 (20): 2574.
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah Boyd. 2014. “Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media.” New Media & Society 16 (7): 1051–1067.
Martínez-Bacaicoa, Jon, Naiara Real-Brioso, Esther Mateos-Pérez, and Manuel Gámez-Guadix. 2024. “The Role of Gender and Sexism in the Moral Disengagement Mechanisms of Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence.” Computers in Human Behavior 1521.
Mijatović, Marija. 2012. “Tijana Milentijević: Znala sam da će Bosiljčić reći ‘da’.” Blic, December 24. [URL]
Napolitano, Alessandra. 2023. “‘A Pandemic within the Pandemic’: A CDA of Social Media Comments on Domestic Violence during COVID-19.” Lingue, Culture, Mediazioni 10 (2): 201–229.
Pabian, Sara, Heidi Vandebosch, Karolien Poels, Katrien Van Cleemput, and Sara Bastiaensens. 2016. “Exposure to Cyberbullying as a Bystander: An Investigation of Desensitization Effects among Early Adolescents.” Computers in Human Behavior 621: 480–487.
Perić, Vedran. 2025. “Stručnjaci o komentarima nakon femicida: ‘Žrtva je ubijena jednom, a komentari je ubijaju ponovno — duhovno.’” Bljesak.info, November 18. [URL]
Recuero, Raquel. 2024. “The Platformization of Violence: Toward a Concept of Discursive Toxicity on Social Media.” Social Media + Society 10 (1): 1–9.
Shaw, Adrienne. 2014. “The Internet Is Full of Jerks, Because the World Is Full of Jerks: What Feminist Theory Teaches Us About the Internet.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 11 (3): 273–277.
Spahić Šiljak, Zilka, and Dženana Djipa. 2024. Gender Equality Barometer Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: United Nations Development Programme and Agency for Gender Equality of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2018. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sutherland, Georgina, Patricia Easteal, Kate Holland, and Cathy Vaughan. 2019. “Mediated Representations of Violence against Women in the Mainstream News in Australia.” BMC Public Health 191: 502.
Taccini, Federica, and Stefania Mannarini. 2024. “News Media Representation of Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 221: 252–267.
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4 (2): 249–283.
Waddell, T. Franklin. 2018. “What Does the Crowd Think? How Online Comments and Popularity Metrics Affect News Credibility and Issue Importance.” New Media & Society 20 (8): 3068–3083.
Wall, David S. 2008. “Cybercrime and the Culture of Fear: Social Science Fiction(s) and the Production of Knowledge about Cybercrime.” Information, Communication & Society 111: 861–864.
Whiting, Jessica, Renata Dansby Olufowote, Jennifer D. Cravens-Pickens, and Amanda Banford Witting. 2019. “Online Blaming and Intimate Partner Violence: A Content Analysis of Social Media Comments.” The Qualitative Report 24 (1): 78–94.
Wright, Emma, Lina Eriksson, and Christopher E. W. Bond. 2025. “Victim Blaming, Gender, and Social Media Commentary: A Randomized Vignette Study of Audience Comments on News Reports of Intimate Partner Homicide.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence.