Introduction In: Journal of Language and Pop Culture: Online-First Articles
Introduction
Where languages for specific purposes meet pop culture
An open-ended conversation about the popularization of science
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Overview of the contributions
- 3.Concluding remarks
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (25)
Australian National
University. (2026). POPSICULE: Science in popular culture and entertainment
hub. [URL]
Bolognesi, M., van den Heerik, R., & van den Berg, E. (2018). VisMet
1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual
metaphor: Structure and
process (pp. 89–114). John Benjamins.
Bucchi, M. (2002). Science
and the media: Alternative routes in scientific
communication. Routledge.
(2008). Of
deficits, deviations and dialogues: Theories of public communication of
science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and
technology (pp. 57–76). Routledge.
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds). (2008). Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and
technology. Routledge.
(Eds). (2014a). Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and technology (2nd
edition). Routledge.
Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (2014b). Science
communication research: Theme and challenges. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and
technology (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (Eds). (2021a). Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and technology (3rd
edition). Routledge.
(2021b). Introduction:
Science communication as the social conversation around
science. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and
technology (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2016). Pictorial
and multimodal metaphor. In E. M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext [Handbook of language in
multimodal
contexts] (pp. 241–260). De Gruyter Mouton.
(2024). Identifying
and interpreting visual metaphors in political cartoons. In M. Romano (Ed.), Metaphor
in socio-political contexts: Current
crises (pp. 255–278). De Gruyter Mouton.
Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D. M., & Scheufele, D. A. (Eds.). (2017). The
Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Oxford University Press.
Janicker, R. (Ed.). (2022). The
scientist in popular culture: Playing god and working wonders. Lexington Books.
Kirby, D. A. (2008). Cinematic
science: The public communication of science and technology in popular
film. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge
handbook of public communication of science and
technology (pp. 41–13). Routledge.
Metzler, H., & Garcia, D. (2024). Social
drivers and algorithmic mechanisms on digital media. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 19(5), 735–748.
McConnel, J. (2025). Building
literacy through pop culture in the ELA classroom: Strategies for English in high school and
college. Routledge.
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology
of transdisciplinarity — Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and
complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and
Science, 11, 17–32.
Pilkington, O. A. (2019). Introduction:
What’s in a name? In O. A. Pilkington & A. G. Pilkington (Eds.), Lab
lit: Exploring literary and cultural representations of
science (pp. 8–19). Lexington Books.
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J. (2018). VISMIP:
Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual
metaphor: Structure and
process (pp. 47–88). John Benjamins.
Trench, B. (2008). Towards
an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating
science in social contexts: New models, new
practices (pp. 119–135). Springer.