Cover not available

Article In: Language and Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Motivating a bipartite analysis for Mandarin focus-sensitive particle ye

 | Beijing Normal University
 | University of Macau
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The authors of this paper argue for a unified analysis of the so-called additive particle ye and scalar particle ye in Mandarin. It reviews the commonalities between additive and scalar sentences involving ye, and some potential problems that a polysemous analysis of ye faces in explaining these facts. Next, a unified analysis of ye is shown to be desirable, where only one lexical item ye is responsible for the additive meaning, and the additional scalar meaning in scalar sentences is attributed to a functional head bearing the scalar feature, which can be realized as lian and is related to a suprasegmental strengthening effect on focus. To formalize this idea, a revised bipartite analysis is built, in which both additive and scalar sentences are underlying Foc-Q-constructions. In additive sentences, Foc carries an unvalued interpretable additive feature [iaddi()], and Q carries the corresponding valued uninterpretable additive feature [uaddi(+)]. Foc and Q Agree in situ; after Spell-Out, Foc is realized as ye, and Q is silent. In scalar sentences, Foc carries [iaddi(+)] and Q carries [uaddi(), iscal(+)]. qp moves to Spec FocP, after which Q Agrees with Foc; after Spell-Out, Foc is realized as ye and Q is realized as lian optionally, and is obligatorily related to the suprasegmental strengthening effect on focus. Movement of qp is triggered by the Agree-check requirement of the unvalued feature carried by Q, rather than the [EPP] feature carried by Foc, making this proposal more minimal. The wh+ye constructions and a parameter concerning the property of the scalar feature are also tentatively discussed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Polysemous analysis: Ye as two distinct items?
    • 2.1A brief introduction to the polysemous analysis of ye
    • 2.2Inadequacies of the polysemous analysis
  • 3.Proposal: A revised bipartite analysis
    • 3.1Bipartite analysis in Quek & Hirsch (2017) and Sun (2021)
    • 3.2A re-examination of basic assumptions
      • 3.2.1[EPP] cannot be the movement trigger in Foc-Q-constructions
      • 3.2.2The bi-directionality of Foc-Q-Agree
    • 3.3A revised bipartite analysis
      • 3.3.1Motivating a revised bipartite analysis
      • 3.3.2More on movement
      • 3.3.3Unravelling the nature of [scal]
  • 4.Extending to wh+ye constructions
  • 5.The cross-linguistic implication of [scal]
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
References (91)
References
Alleton, Viviane. 1972. Les adverbes en chinois moderne. Paris: Mouton & Co. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Badan, Linda & Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2011. On the syntax of topic and focus in Chinese. In Benincà, Paola & Munaro, Nicola (eds.), Mapping the left periphery, volume 5: The cartography of syntactic structures, 63–90. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The even-construction and the low periphery in Mandarin Chinese. In Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax, 33–74. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. 2008. The syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Agreement and case. In den Dikken, Marcel (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 607–654. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Camargo Souza, Livia. 2020. Agree without agreement: Switch-reference and reflexive voice in two Panoan languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 38(4). 1053–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balogh, Kata & Langer, Corinna. 2022. Additive particles, prosodic structure and focus sensitivity in Hungarian. Linguistics 60(1). 277–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and logical form: On the scope of focusing particles and wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Criterial freezing in the syntax of particles. In Hartmann, Jutta M. & Jäger, Marion & Kehl, Andreas & Konietzko, Andreas & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical approaches and empirical domains, 225–263. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana. 2003. Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Toronto: University of Toronto. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(4). 757–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O. 1989. Ye as manifested on three discourse planes: Polysemy or abstraction? In Tai, H-Y. James & Hsueh, F.-S. Frank (eds.), Functionalism and Chinese grammar, 1–18. South Orange: Chinese Language Teachers Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5(3). 167–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Agree, phases, and intervention effects. Linguistic Analysis 33(1–2). 54–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. Linguistic Inquiry 38(4). 589–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(3). 455–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On unvalued uninterpretable features. In Lima, Suzi & Mullin, Kevin & Smith, Brian W. (eds.), NELS 39: Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 11, 109–120. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Principles and parameters theory and minimalism. In den Dikken, Marcel (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of generative syntax, 95–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katharina. 2001. The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19(2). 229–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2010. The grammar of Q: Q-particles, wh-movement, and pied-piping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki. 2005. Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23(2). 219–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki & Diercks, Michael. 2013. Agreeing how? Implications for theories of agreement and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 44(2). 179–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Liping. 2008. Dou: Distributivity and beyond. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & Huang, C.-T. James. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 4(2). 121–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, Roger & Michaels, David & Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Approaching UG from below. In Sauerland, Uli & Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics, 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert & Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chou, Chao-Ting Tim. 2013. Unvalued interpretable features and topic A-movement in Chinese raising modal constructions. Lingua 1231. 118–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1996. Local economy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose. 2015. Properties of probes: Evidence from Nez Perce complementizer agreement. In Bui, Thuy & Özyıldız, Deniz (eds.), NELS 45: Proceedings of the Forty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 179–192. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. A theory of indexical shift: Meaning, grammar, and crosslinguistic variation. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. Interaction, satisfaction, and the PCC. Linguistic Inquiry 55(1). 39–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David & Pires, Acrisio & Seely, Thomas Daniel. 2005. EPP in T: More controversial subjects. Syntax 8(1). 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Epstein, Samuel David & Seely, Thomas Daniel. 2002. Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Epstein, Samuel David & Seely, Thomas Daniel (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Derivations in minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald G. 1978. Copying from complements in Blackfoot. In Cook, Eung-Do & Kaye, Jonathan (eds.), Linguistic studies of native Canada, 89–109. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedding, Andrew A. 2022. How to move a focus: The syntax of alternative particles. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Heim, Irene R. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hirsch, Aron. 2017. An inflexible semantics for cross-categorial operators. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yě. London: RoutledgeCurzon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. A distributed syntax for evaluative ‘only’ sentences in German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34(1). 43–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. A crosslinguistic syntax of scalar and non-scalar focus particle sentences: The view from Vietnamese and Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(4). 389–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. The relationship between Chinese zhiyou ‘only’ and cai: A matter of morphosyntax. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32(2). 245–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 2007. Separating “focus movement” from focus. In Karimi, Simin & Samiian, Vida & Wilkins, Wendy K. (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 108–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, Xiaoshi. 2023. Defectivity matters: Cliticization in French causatives revisited. Linguistic Inquiry 54(4). 759–796. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James & Yang, C.-Y. Barry. 2024. Locality, focus and covert movement. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 33(1). 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kadmon, Nirit & Landman, Fred. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25(3–4). 209–257.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jaecheol. 2003. Phase sensitivity in wh-dependencies. Korean Journal of Linguistics 28(1). 67–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Youngjoo. 2004. The syntax and semantics of focus particles. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2005. Exhaustivity as agreement: The case of Korean man ‘only’. Natural Language Semantics 13(2). 169–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Wei-wen Roger & Jheng, Wei-Cherng Sam. 2025. A tale of two EVENs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 43(3). 1949–1981. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Mingming. 2016. Non-exclusive ‘only’ in Mandarin Chinese. In Burkholder, Ross & Cisneros, Carlos & Coppess, Emily R. & Grove, Julian & Hanink, Emily A. & McMahan, Hilary & Meyer, Cherry & Pavlou, Natalia & Sarıgül, Özge & Singerman, Adam Roth & Zhang, Anqi (eds.), Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 335–348. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023a. Additivity, scalarity and Mandarin universal wh’s. Natural Language Semantics 31(2–3). 179–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023b. A bidirectional systematic study of multifunctional adverbs and related grammatical phenomena: Taking “dou, ye” as a window into the phenomena of universal quantification and free choice in modern Chinese. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1999. Xiandai Hanyu babai ci. Revised edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2004. Phrase impenetrability and wh-intervention. In Stepanov, Arthur & Fanselow, Gisbert & Vogel, Ralf (eds.), Minimality effects in syntax, 289–325. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. On deriving CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 41(1). 35–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narita, Hiroki & Fukui, Naoki. 2022. Symmetrizing syntax: Merge, minimality, and equilibria. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pan, Junnan Victor. 2016. Resumptivity in Mandarin Chinese: A minimalist account. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1979. Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the “lian…ye/dou” construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 5(1). 47–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2005. Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 2005(33). 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Karimi, Simin & Samiian, Vida & Wilkins, Wendy K. (eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quek, Yihui & Hirsch, Aron. 2017. Severing focus form and meaning in Standard and Colloquial Singapore English. In Lamont, Andrew & Tetzlof, Katerina (eds.), NELS 47: Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 31, 15–24. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Marc D. 2011. Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Syntax 14(1). 74–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Springer: Dordrecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats Edward. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Saeed, John Ibrahim. 1984. The syntax of focus and topic in Somali. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2014. Topic and focus. In Huang, C.-T. James & Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Simpson, Andrew. (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 100–125. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Minimizers and EVEN. Linguistics 54(6). 1355–1395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1996. Icelandic finite verb agreement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 571. 1–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, Yenan. 2021. A bipartite analysis of zhiyou ‘only’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 30(4). 319–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2022. Topicalization defined by syntax. In Huang, Chu-Ren & Lin, Yen-Hwei & Chen, I-Hsuan & Hsu, Yu-Yin (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, 616–634. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiang, Ming. 2008. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(3). 227–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xing, Yue. 2023. Mirative focalization: A case study of Mandarin lian-DP dou construction. Linguistics Beyond and Within 91. 238–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiong, Zhongru. 2017. A cartographic analysis of even⁃sentences in Mandarin. Xiandai Waiyu 40(4). 439–450.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Zhaole. 2018. Mandarin yě and scalarity. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39(2). 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Yě, yě, yě: On the syntax and semantics of Mandarin yě. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
. 2025. Three yěs in Mandarin. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 12(1). 1–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, Yulin. 2006. The information structure of the lian-construction in Mandarin. Yuyan Kexue 5(2). 14–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1). 39–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue