Article In: Language and Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Towards a new dialectology of Situ Gyalrong
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article proposes a refined dialectological framework for
Situ Gyalrong and pursues two primary objectives. First, by identifying shared
innovations, it delimits the external boundaries of Situ within the Gyalrongic
subgroup, thereby resolving debates about the affiliation of its northern
dialects spoken around Barkam with those of the southern regions. Second,
building on Gong’s (Gong, Xun. 2017. Mariëlle
Prins: A grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of
relations. (Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library.) xxiv, 782 pp. Leiden: Brill,
2016. €197. ISBN 978 9 004 32456 5. Bulletin
of the School of Oriental and African
Studies 80(2). 393–394. ; . 2018. Le
rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest: Une étude
descriptive, typologique et
comparative. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO). (Doctoral
dissertation.)) distinction between
deprenasalizing and leniting dialects, the paper argues that both
deprenasalization and lenition occurred multiple times in Situ dialects. It
identifies distinct strata of deprenasalization separating southern and northern
varieties within the deprenasalizing group and demonstrates that lenition of
voiceless stops defines a Bragbar-Kyomkyo subclade within the leniting group.
While the proposed classification provides a foundation for future research, the
sound changes examined, deprenasalization, lenition, and fortition, also
contribute to Gyalrongic historical linguistics and to the areal typology of
sound changes in the Qiangic-speaking region.
Keywords: Situ Gyalrong, dialectology, shared innovation, deprenasalization, lenition, fortition
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous classification
- 2.1Gates (2014)
- 2.2Gong (2017; 2018)
- 2.3Terminology and data of the present study
- 3.Situ as a subgroup of Gyalrong proper
- 3.1Phonological innovations
- 3.1.1Neutralization of Proto-Gyalrong uvular and velar consonants
- 3.1.2Palatalization of Proto-Gyalrong numeral ‘ten’
- 3.1.3Palatalization of alveolar affricates and fricatives
- 3.2Lexical innovations
- 3.2.1Lexical and morpho-lexical innovations
- 3.2.2Kinship terminology
- 3.2.3Orientation system
- 3.3Morphological innovations
- 3.3.1Generic use of first-person plural possessive forms
- 3.3.2Collectives of reciprocal social relations
- 3.1Phonological innovations
- 4.Deprenasalization in Situ A
- 4.1Deprenasalization as a shared innovation of Situ A
- 4.1.1Labial prenasalized stop *ⁿb-
- 4.1.2Velar prenasalized stop *ⁿg-
- 4.1.3Alveolar prenasalized consonants *ⁿd- and *ⁿdz-
- 4.2Deprenasalization as independent innovations within Situ
- 4.1Deprenasalization as a shared innovation of Situ A
- 5.Fortition and lenition in Situ B
- 5.1Phonological innovations of Situ B
- 5.1.1*j- fortition
- 5.1.2*ts- > z- lenition
- 5.1.3Palatal obstruent voicing
- 5.2Lenition as independent innovations within Situ B
- 5.2.1Lenition of *p-
- 5.2.2Lenition of *k-
- 5.2.3Lenition of *t-
- 5.1Phonological innovations of Situ B
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- List of abbreviations
References
References (67)
Benedict, Paul K. 1942. Tibetan
and Chinese kinship terms. Harvard Journal of
Asiatic
Studies 6(3-4). 313–337.
bTsan lha Ngag dbang Tshul
khrims. 2009. A lexicon of the
rGyalrong bTsanlha dialect:
rGyalrong-Chinese-Tibetan-English. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
Campbell, Lyle & Mixco, Mauricio J. 2007. A
glossary of historical
linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Chirkova, Katia & Handel, Zev. 2019. “Brightening”
in Ersu, Lizu, Duoxu and neighboring
languages. (Paper presented at
the 5th Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of
Southwest China
(STLS-2019), Tianjin, 21–23
August 2019.)
Evans, Jonathan. 1999. Southern
Qiang fieldnotes. STEDT
database. ([URL]) (Accessed 2026-05-20.) (Manuscript.)
Gates, Jesse P. 2014. Situ
in Situ: Towards a dialectology of Jiāróng
(rGyalrong). München: Lincom Europa.
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 2003. Tangut. In Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J. (eds.), The
Sino-Tibetan languages, 1st
edn., 602–620. London: Routledge.
Gong, Xun. 2017. Mariëlle
Prins: A grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of
relations. (Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library.) xxiv, 782 pp. Leiden: Brill,
2016. €197. ISBN 978 9 004 32456 5. Bulletin
of the School of Oriental and African
Studies 80(2). 393–394.
. 2018. Le
rgyalrong zbu, une langue tibéto-birmane de Chine du Sud-ouest: Une étude
descriptive, typologique et
comparative. Paris: Institut National des Langues et Civilisations Orientales (INALCO). (Doctoral
dissertation.)
Hill, Nathan W. 2019. The
historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and
Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Honkasalo, Sami. 2019. A
grammar of Eastern Geshiza: A culturally anchored
description. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral
dissertation).
Huang, Liangrong & Sun, Hongkai (eds.). 2002. Han
Jiarong
cidian. Beijing: The Ethnic Publishing House.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie
et morphologie du Japhug
(rGyalrong). Paris: Université Paris VII — Denis Diderot. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
. 2014. Esquisse
de phonologie et de morphologie historique du
tangoute. Leiden: Global Oriental/Brill.
. 2015b. Dictionnaire
Japhug-Chinois-Français (Version
1.0). Paris: Projet HimalCo. ([URL]) (Accessed 2026-06-16.)
. 2015c. The
spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug
Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 38(2). 271–291.
Jacques, Guillaume & Pellard, Thomas. 2021. Phylogenies
based on lexical innovations refute the Rung
hypothesis. Diachronica 38(1). 1–24.
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire
du Khroskyabs de
Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris 3 — Sorbonne Nouvelle. (Doctoral
dissertation.)
. 2022. When
internal reconstruction goes further: Proposing the vowel system of
Pre-Khroskyabs through examining bound state
apophony. Folia
Linguistica 56(s43-s1). 213–261.
. 2023a. Lenition
alternation in West Gyalrongic and its implications for Southeast Asian
panchronic
phonology. Diachronica 40(3). 341–383.
. 2023b. On
plosive-nasal correspondences and alternations in Gyalrongic and their
possible solutions. Cahiers de Linguistique
Asie
Orientale 52(1). 1–39.
. 2024. Mutual
predictiveness of sound correspondences for reconstruction and language
subgrouping: The case of Gyalrongic
preinitials. Diachronica 41(5). 635–677.
. 2025. Thoughts
on the etyma for ‘corpse’ in Gyalrongic
languages. Transactions of the Philological
Society 123(1). 65–76.
Lai, Yunfan & Gong, Xun & Gates, Jesse & Jacques, Guillaume. 2020. Tangut
as a West Gyalrongic language. Folia
Linguistica 54(s41-s1). 171–203.
Lai, Yunfan & Zhang, Shuya. 2026. Shared
innovations and the “Tangut-Horpa clade”: A demonstration of Neogrammarian
principles in language
classification. Bulletin of the School of
Oriental and African
Studies 89(1). 163–191.
Lin, You-Jing. 2002. A
dimension missed: East and west in Situ rGyalrong orientation
marking. Language and
Linguistics 3(1). 27–42.
. 2003. Tense
and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong
verb. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie
Orientale 32(2). 245–286.
Lin, You-Jing & Hu, Chenying. 2016. The
privative word-tone system of Btsanlha
Rgyalrong. Yuyanxue
Luncong 54(2). 29–52.
Matisoff, James A. 2004. “Brightening”
and the place of Xixia (Tangut) in the Qiangic branch of
Tibeto-Burman. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies
on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on
his seventieth
birthday, 327–352. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Nagano, Yasuhiko. 2018. A
reference grammar of the rGyalrong language: Bhola
dialect. Tokyo: Kyuko Shoin.
Nagano, Yasuhiko & Prins, Marielle (eds.). 2013. rGyalrongic
languages database. ([URL]) (Accessed 2026-04-21.)
Prins, Marielle. 2016. A
grammar of rGyalrong, Jiǎomùzú (Kyom-kyo) dialects: A web of
relations. Leiden: Brill.
Sagart, Laurent. 1999. The
roots of Old
Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sagart, Laurent & Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan & Ryder, Robin J. & Thouzeau, Valentin & Greenhill, Simon J. & List, Johann-Mattis. 2019. Dated
language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of
Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America 116(21). 10317–10322.
Sun, Hongkai. 1991. From
lexical comparison to observe the relationship of Xixia language and Qiang
branch languages of Tibeto-Burman
group. Minzu
Yuwen 1991(2). 1–11.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1995. Projects
for the collection and analysis of rGyalrong oral
texts. (Manuscript.)
1997. Caodeng. STEDT
database. (Manuscript.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2024-11-19.)
1998. Nominal
morphology in Caodeng rGyalrong. Bulletin of
the Institute of History and Philology, Academia
Sinica 69(1). 103–149.
2000a. Parallelisms
in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in
rGyalrongic. Language and
Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.
2000b. Stem
alternations in Puxi verb inflection: Toward validating the rGyalrongic
subgroup in Qiangic. Language and
Linguistics 1(2). 211–232.
2004. Verb-stem
variations in Showu
rGyalrong. In Lin, Ying-chin & Hsu, Fang-min & Lee, Chun-chih & Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Yang, Hsiu-fang & Ho, Dah-an (eds.), Studies
on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on
his seventieth
birthday, 269–296. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
2023. Gser-Rdo:
A new Tibetic language across the Rngaba-Dkarmdzes
border. Language and
Linguistics 24(2). 345–390.
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Lin, You-Jing. 2007. Constructional
variation in rGyalrong relativization: How to make a
choice? (Paper presented
at International Workshop on Relative
Clauses, Taipei, 2–3
November 2007.)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Bstan’dzin Blogros. 2019. Tshobdun
Rgyalrong spoken texts with a grammatical
introduction. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Wang, Zhen. 2020. Jiarong
yu dongbu fangyan de fuyin duiying he lishi yanbian — jiyu Qingdai Jiarong
Yiyu he xiandai fangyan cailiao de
kaocha. Cishu
Yanjiu (2). 112–119.
Zhang, Shuya. 2018. Stem
alternations in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ
Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
Area 41(2). 294–330.
. 2020. Le
rgyalrong situ de Brag-bar et sa contribution à la typologie de l’expression
des relations spatiales: L’orientation et le mouvement
associé. Paris: Institut National des Langues et des Civilisations Orientales (INALCO). (Doctoral
dissertation.)
. 2022a. Indefinite
direction and associated motion prefixes in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ
Rgyalrong. In Arakawa, Shintaro & Ikeda, Takumi (eds.), Grammatical
phenomena of Sino-Tibetan languages 3: Functions of directional
prefixes, 125–152. Kyoto: Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University.
. 2022b. Rethinking
the *-s suffix in Old Chinese: With new evidence from Situ
Rgyalrong. Folia Linguistica
Historica 56(s43-s1). 129–167.
. 2023a. Towards
a new generalisation of the tri-axial orientation system in Situ
Rgyalrong. Transactions of the Philological
Society 121(2). 203–225.
. 2023b. Core
argument relativization in the Brag-bar dialect of Situ
Rgyalrong. Yuyan
Kexue 22(1). 76–89.
. 2025. Tangut
directional prefixes and verbal
orientability. Language and
Linguistics. ([URL]) (Accessed 2026-06-15.)
. 2026. Revisiting
the phonological innovations and dialectal affiliation of Jiarong
Yiyu. Zhongguo
Yuwen 432(3). 42–61.
Zhang, Shuya & Jacques, Guillaume & Lai, Yunfan. 2019. A
study of cognates between Gyalrong languages and Old
Chinese. Journal of Language
Relationship 17(1-2). 73–92.
Zhang, Shuya & Fan, Jingming. 2020. Brag-bar
kinship system in synchronic and diachronic
perspectives. Bulletin of the School of
Oriental and African
Studies 83(3). 479–503.