Article In: Language and Dialogue: Online-First Articles
Why dialogue matters in aphasia
From loss of language to disrupted dialogic use
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Aphasia is commonly described as impairment of an individual language system. This article asks what happens to dialogue when the linguistic resources used to accomplish social action are disrupted. Drawing on Weigand’s language-as-dialogue theory and Mixed Game Model, together with dialogical linguistics, conversation analysis, multimodal interaction and functional communication, it argues that impairment is necessary but insufficient to explain aphasic performance. Dialogue is the organisation through which impaired and preserved resources become consequential for initiative, reaction, repair and understanding under particular partner and activity conditions. The account distinguishes individual linguistic capacity, competence-in-performance, dyadic accomplishment and participation, and shows how aphasia sharpens dialogue theory under communicative asymmetry.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.What impairment accounts explain and what they leave unresolved
- 3.Dialogue as the constitutive organisation of language use
- 3.1Dialogue beyond communicative context
- 3.2Dialogue as a complex whole
- 3.3Action, reaction and the pursuit of understanding
- 3.4Relating impairment to dialogic accomplishment
- 4.Dialogic action under aphasic conditions
- 4.1Initiative and reactive action
- 4.2Repair and the pursuit of understanding
- 4.3Shared attention and multimodal means
- 4.4Adaptation across partners and activities
- 5.Competence-in-performance under asymmetry
- 6.Consequences for assessment and rehabilitation
- 6.1What assessment can infer
- 6.2What intervention changes
- 7.Conclusion
References
References (49)
Auer, Peter and Angelika Bauer. 2011. “Multimodality in Aphasic Conversation: Why Gestures Sometimes Do Not Help.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 2(2): 215–243.
Azios, Jamie H., Brent Archer, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Anastasia Raymer, Marcella Carragher, Shriya Shashikanth, and Eleanor Gulick. 2022. “Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31(6): 2920–2942.
Barnes, Scott. 2016. “Aphasia and Open Format Other-Initiation of Repair: Solving Complex Trouble in Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(2): 111–127.
Beeke, Suzanne, Sam Capindale, and Lin Cockayne. 2020. “Correction and Turn Completion as Collaborative Repair Strategies in Conversations following Wernicke’s Aphasia.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 34(10–11): 933–953.
Beeke, Suzanne, Fiona Johnson, Firle Beckley, Claudia Heilemann, Susan Edwards, Jane Maxim, and Wendy Best. 2014. “Enabling Better Conversations between a Man with Aphasia and His Conversation Partner: Incorporating Writing into Turn Taking.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(3): 292–305.
Beeke, Suzanne, Jane Maxim, and Ray Wilkinson. 2007a. “Using Conversation Analysis to Assess and Treat People with Aphasia.” Seminars in Speech and Language 28(2): 136–147.
Beeke, Suzanne, Ray Wilkinson, and Jane Maxim. 2007b. “Grammar without Sentence Structure: A Conversation Analytic Investigation of Agrammatism.” Aphasiology 21(3–4): 256–282.
Berg, Karianne, Torunn Askim, Susan Balandin, Elizabeth Armstrong, and Marit By Rise. 2017. “Experiences of Participation in Goal Setting for People with Stroke-Induced Aphasia in Norway. A Qualitative Study.” Disability and Rehabilitation 39(11): 1122–1130.
Best, Wendy, Jennie Grassly, Alison Greenwood, Ruth Herbert, Julie Hickin, and David Howard. 2011. “A Controlled Study of Changes in Conversation following Aphasia Therapy for Anomia.” Disability and Rehabilitation 33(3): 229–242.
Best, Wendy, Jane Maxim, Claudia Heilemann, Firle Beckley, Fiona Johnson, Susan I. Edwards, David Howard, and Suzanne Beeke. 2016. “Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners Using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 101: 562.
Bruns, Claudia, Rosemary Varley, Vitor C. Zimmerer, Marcella Carragher, Gerrit Brekelmans, and Suzanne Beeke. 2019. “‘I Don’t Know’: A Usage-Based Approach to Familiar Collocations in Non-Fluent Aphasia.” Aphasiology 33(2): 140–162.
Caramazza, Alfonso. 1984. “The Logic of Neuropsychological Research and the Problem of Patient Classification in Aphasia.” Brain and Language 21(1): 9–20.
Caramazza, Alfonso and Edgar B. Zurif. 1976. “Dissociation of Algorithmic and Heuristic Processes in Language Comprehension: Evidence from Aphasia.” Brain and Language 3(4): 572–582.
Carragher, Marcella, Zaneta Mok, Gillian Steel, Paul Conroy, Kathryn Pettigrove, Miranda L. Rose, and Leanne Togher. 2024. “Towards Efficient, Ecological Assessment of Interaction: A Scoping Review of Co-Constructed Communication.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 59(3): 831–875.
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Brennan. 1991. “Grounding in Communication.” In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deppermann, Arnulf and Michael Haugh. 2022. “Action Ascription in Social Interaction.” In Action Ascription in Interaction, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann and Michael Haugh, 3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dipper, Lucy Tamsin, Niamh Devane, Rachel Barnard, Nicola Botting, Mary Boyle, Lin Cockayne, Deborah Hersh, et al. 2024. “A Feasibility Randomised Waitlist-Controlled Trial of a Personalised Multi-Level Language Treatment for People with Aphasia: The Remote LUNA Study.” PLOS ONE 19(6): e0304385.
Dipper, Lucy Tamsin, Jane Marshall, Mary Boyle, Deborah Hersh, Nicola Botting, and Madeline Cruice. 2021. “Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia.” Brain Sciences 11(2): 183.
Doedens, Willemijn, Arpita Bose, Lydia Lambert, and Lotte Meteyard. 2021. “Face-to-Face Communication in Aphasia: The Influence of Conversation Partner Familiarity on a Collaborative Communication Task.” Frontiers in Communication 61: 574051.
Doedens, Willemijn J. and Lotte Meteyard. 2022. “What Is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.” Neuropsychology Review 32(4): 937–973.
Goodwin, Charles. 1995. “Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations with an Aphasic Man.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): 233–260.
. 2004. “A Competent Speaker Who Can’t Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 151–170.
Groenewold, Rimke and Elizabeth Armstrong. 2018. “The Effects of Enactment on Communicative Competence in Aphasic Casual Conversation: A Functional Linguistic Perspective.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 53(4): 836–851.
. 2019. “A Multimodal Analysis of Enactment in Everyday Interaction in People with Aphasia.” Aphasiology 33(12): 1441–1461.
Herbert, Ruth, Julie Hickin, David Howard, Fiona Osborne, and Wendy Best. 2008. “Do Picture-Naming Tests Provide a Valid Assessment of Lexical Retrieval in Conversation in Aphasia?” Aphasiology 22(2): 184–203.
Hinckley, Jacqueline and Mark Jayes. 2023. “Person-Centered Care for People with Aphasia: Tools for Shared Decision-Making.” Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 41: 1236534.
Kagan, Aura, Sandra E. Black, Judith Felson Duchan, Nina Simmons-Mackie, and Paula Square. 2001. “Training Volunteers as Conversation Partners Using ‘Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia’ (SCA): A Controlled Trial.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44(3): 624–638.
Killmer, Helene, Jan Svennevig, and Suzanne Beeke. 2022. “Joint Planning in Conversations with a Person with Aphasia.” Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 72–89.
Leaman, Marion C. and Brent Archer. 2022. “‘If You Just Stay with Me and Wait… You’ll Get an Idea of What I’m Saying’: The Communicative Benefits of Time for Conversational Self-Repair for People with Aphasia.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31(3): 1264–1283.
Leaman, Marion C., Brent Archer, and Lisa A. Edmonds. 2022. “Toward Empowering Conversational Agency in Aphasia: Understanding Mechanisms of Topic Initiation in People with and without Aphasia.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31(1): 322–341.
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Myrberg, Karin, Lars-Christer Hydén, and Christina Samuelsson. 2018. “Different Approaches in Aphasia Assessments: A Comparison between Test and Everyday Conversations.” Aphasiology 32(4): 417–435.
Rotherham, Annette, Kirstine Shrubsole, Claire Croteau, Katerina Hilari, Helen Wallace, and Sarah J. Wallace. 2024. “Measuring Successful Conversations in Couples with and without Aphasia: A Scoping Review.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 59(6): 2554–2579.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53(2): 361–382.
Schultz, Kristina, Chelsea S. Larkman, Miranda L. Rose, Leanne Togher, and Marcella Carragher. 2026. “Do Word- and Sentence-Level Treatments Generalize to Dialogue? A Systematic Review and Synthesis of the Evidence in Poststroke Aphasia Interventions.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 35(3): 1274–1303.
Simmons-Mackie, Nina, Anastasia Raymer, and Leora R. Cherney. 2016. “Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: An Updated Systematic Review.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 97(12): 2202–2221.e8.
Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä. 2012. “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(3): 297–321.
Tuomenoksa, Asta, Suzanne Beeke, and Anu Klippi. 2022. “People with Non-Fluent Aphasia Initiating Actions in Everyday Conversation with Familiar Conversation Partners: Resources for Participation.” Aphasiology 36(5): 575–598.
Wallace, Sarah J., Linda Worrall, Tanya A. Rose, Reem S. W. Alyahya, Edna Babbitt, Suzanne Beeke, Carola de Beer, et al. 2023. “Measuring Communication as a Core Outcome in Aphasia Trials: Results of the ROMA-2 International Core Outcome Set Development Meeting.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 58(4): 1017–1028.
Wallace, Sarah J., Linda Worrall, Tanya Rose, Guylaine Le Dorze, Madeline Cruice, Jytte Isaksen, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Nina Simmons-Mackie, Nerina Scarinci, and Christine Alary Gauvreau. 2017. “Which Outcomes Are Most Important to People with Aphasia and Their Families? An International Nominal Group Technique Study Framed within the ICF.” Disability and Rehabilitation 39(14): 1364–1379.
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2021. “Dialogue: The Complex Whole.” Language and Dialogue 11(3): 457–486.