Article published in:
Language-Learner Computer Interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications
Edited by Catherine Caws and Marie-Josée Hamel
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 2] 2016
► pp. 6587
References

References

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., … Schoenemann, T.
(2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://​cnl​.psych​.cornell​.edu​/pubs​/2009​-LACAS​-pos​-LL​.pdf DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blythe, R.A., & Croft, W.A.
(2009) The speech community in evolutionary language dynamics. InN.C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman(Eds.), Language as a complex adaptive system (pp. 47–63). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(1998) The emergent lexicon. CLS34: The Panels. Chicago Linguistics Society (pp. 421–435). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(2006) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C.A.
(1997) Call in the Year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19–43.Google Scholar
Colpaert, J.
(2013) Peripatetic consideration on research challenges in CALL. InP. Hubbard, M. Schulze, & B. Smith(Eds.), Learner-computer interaction in language education (pp. 272–279). San Marcos, TX: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P.
(1974) Error analysis. InJ.P.B. Allen & P. Corder(Eds.), The Edinburgh course in applied linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 122–131). London, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, B., & Simmt, E.
(2003) Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, B., & Sumara, D.
(2008) Complexity as a theory of education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5(2), 33–34.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) Research second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. InM.H. Verspoor, K. de Bot & W. Lowie(Eds.), A dynamic approach to second languaged Development (pp.5–24). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
(2005) Dynamic systems theory and applied linguistics: The ultimate “so what”? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 116–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2014) Researching complex dynamic systems: “Retrodictive qualitative modeling” in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2006) Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics: Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. InN. C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman(Eds.), Language as a complex adaptive system (pp.90–125). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fischer, K., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Konstruktionsgrammatik: Ein Überblick. InK. Fischer 
& A. Stefanowitsch(Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 3–17). Tübingen, Deutschland: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O.
(2004) Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. 
Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.P.
(2006) Why game studies now? Video games: A new art form. Games & Culture, 1(1), 58–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, J.
(1987) Chaos: Making a new science. New York, N.Y.: Viking.Google Scholar
Heift, T., & Schulze, M.
in press). Tutorial CALL. Language Teaching.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U.
(2002) A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hubbard, P., & Bradin-Siskin, C.
(2004) Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 448–461.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W.
(1986) Second language acquisition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.D.
(1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S.
(1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lado, R.
(1957) Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) The relevance of cognitive grammar for language pedagogy. InS. De Knop & T. De Rycker(Eds.), Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar. A volume in honour of René Dirven (pp. 7–35). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P.
(2006) Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics – A sociocultural perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 717–728. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Thorne, S.L.
(2006) Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J.P., & Poehner, M.
(2014) Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(1997) Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Language acquisition and language use form a chaos/complexity theory perspective. InC. Kramsch(Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London, United Kingdom: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2006) The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L.
(2008a) Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008b) Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liou, H.-C.
(2012) The roles of Second Life in a college computer assisted language learning (CALL) course in Taiwan, ROC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(4), 365–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW.C. Ritchie & B.T. K(Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, E.N.
(1993) The essence of chaos. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2006) Emergentism – Use often and with care. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 729–740. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marek, M.W., & Wu, W.-C.V.
(2014) Environmental factors affecting computer assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, J.-O., & Fried, M.
(2004) Historical and intellectual background of construction grammar. Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective (pp. 1–10). Amsterdam, 
Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, M.
(2008) Modeling SLA processes using NLP. InC. Chapelle, Y.-R. Chung, & J. Xu(Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic assessment (pp. 149–116). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Schulze, M., & Penner, N.
(2008) Construction grammar in ICALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 427–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1974) Interlanguage. InJ.C. Richards(Ed.), Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 31–54). London, United Kingdom: Longman.Google Scholar
(1992) Rediscovering interlanguage. London, United Kingdom: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, B.
(2005) The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 33–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G.
(2013) Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: An emic approach. ReCALL, 25(1), 48–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sockett, G., & Toffoli, D.
(2012) Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorites paradox
(2014) Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://​en​.wikipedia​.orgGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. InS.M. Gass & C.G. Madden(Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L.
(2011) Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Bristol, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Thorne, S.L., Fischer, I., & Lu, X.
(2012) The semiotic ecology and linguistic complexity of an online game world. ReCALL, 24(3), 279–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Konstruktionsgrammatik und früher Erstsprachenerwerb. InK. Fischer 
& A. Stefanowitsch(Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie (pp. 19–37). Tübingen, Deutschland: Stauffenberg Verlag.Google Scholar
van Geert, P.
(1994) Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. Hertfordshire, United Kingdom: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M.
(2002) Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour & Development, 25, 340–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., & Steenbeck, H.
(2005) Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25(3–4), 408–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W.
(2011) A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, C.
(1979) Fortgesetzter Versuch. Aufsätze, Gespräche, Essays [Continued attempts. Articles, dialogues, essays]. Leipzig, Deutschland: Reclam-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zheng, D.
(2012) Caring in the dynamics of design and languaging: Exploring second language learning in 3D virtual spaces. Language Sciences, 34(5), 543–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, D., Young, M.F., Wagner, M.M., & Brewer, R.A.
(2009) Negotiation for action: English language learning in game-based virtual worlds. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 489–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar