Article In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2026
Edited by Remco Knooihuizen, Marloes Oomen and Alex Reuneker
[Nota Bene 3:2] 2026
► pp. 1–
Gender-inclusive language in French
Where do L2 learners stand?
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Gender-inclusive language aims to improve the representation of women and gender minorities, while reducing male-biased interpretations. Critics, such as the Académie française, argue that inclusive language complicates literacy for L1 pupils and can hinder learning for L2 learners of French. Yet, empirical work on opinions towards inclusive forms has focused almost exclusively on L1 speakers, highlighting the role of factors such as ideology and prior knowledge. The perspective of L2 received limited recognition. This exploratory questionnaire study investigates the support for teaching and using inclusive forms in French class of 62 learners of French at a multilingual Dutch university. We examine whether support is predicted by learners’ opinions on gender-inclusive language in their L1, L1 background (18 different L1s), gender, French proficiency, prior knowledge of inclusive forms, and perceived difficulty. Learners are more supportive than neutral, and only L1 opinions and perceived difficulty significantly predict support.
Keywords: gender, inclusive-language, French, second language acquisition, opinions
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Inclusive language and education
- 2.1Societal debates and L1 speakers’ opinions
- 2.2Implementation in educational settings
- 2.3Research question and hypotheses
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Procedure and materials
- 3.4Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Quantitative analysis
- 4.2Qualitative analysis
- 5.Discussion
- Acknowledgment
- Notes
- Author queries
Bibliography
References (21)
Académie française. 2002. Féminisation des noms de métiers, fonctions, grades et titres. [URL] (1 April 2026)
. 2021. Lettre ouverte sur l’écriture inclusive. [URL] (1 June 2026)
Arbour, Marie-Ève, Hélène De Nayves & Ariane Royer. 2014. Féminisation linguistique: étude comparative de l’implantation de variantes féminines marquées au Canada et en Europe. Langage et Société 148(2). 31–51.
Brauer, Markus & Michael Landry. 2008. Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte? L’impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales. L’Année Psychologique 1081. 243–272.
Burnett, Heather, & Céline Pozniak. 2021. Political dimensions of gender inclusive writing in Parisian universities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25(5), 808–831.
De Beaumont, Éléonore. 2023. Vers une prise en compte de la non-binarité dans l’enseignement du FLE. Propositions pour un réagencement des pratiques pédagogiques. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures. Les Cahiers de l’Acedle 21(1). 1–18.
Ivanová, Martina & Miroslava Kyselová. 2022. Attitudes towards gender-inclusive language among Slovak, Czech, and Polish speakers. Jazykovedny Casopis 73(3). 395–420.
Johnson, Paige. 2024. (Re) Contextualizing the ‘anti-woke’ discourse: Attitudes towards gender-inclusive language in English and French on X (formerly Twitter). Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 14(1). 12–34.
Kaplan, Jennifer M. 2022. Pluri-grammars for pluri-genders: Competing gender systems in the nominal morphology of non-binary French. Languages 7(4). Article 266.
Morgenroth, Thekla & Michelle K. Ryan. 2021. The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16(6). 1113–1142.
Parks, Janet B. & Mary A. Roberton. 2004. Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language. Psychology of Women Quarterly 28(3). 233–239.
Peters, Hugues. 2020. Gender-inclusivity and gender-neutrality in foreign language teaching: The case of French. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics 3(3). 183–195.
R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Remsö, Amanda, Hanna Bäck & Emma A. Renström. 2025. A sexist language? Gender differences in attitudes and use of gender-inclusive pronouns. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 44(5). 682–703.
Renström, Emma A., Anna Lindqvist & Marie G. Sendén. 2022. The multiple meanings of the gender-inclusive pronoun hen: Predicting attitudes and use. European Journal of Social Psychology 52(1). 71–90.
Riegel, Martin, Jean-Christophe Pellate & René Rioul. 1994. Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Sato, Sayaka, Pascal Gygax & Ute Gabriel. 2013. Gender inferences: Grammatical features and their impact on the representation of gender in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4). 792–807.
Sarrasin, Oriane, Ute Gabriel & Pascal Gygax. 2012. Sexism and attitudes toward gender-neutral language. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71(3). 113–124.
Sczesny, Sabine, Franziska Moser & Wendy Wood. 2015. Beyond sexist beliefs: How do people decide to use gender-inclusive language?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(7). 943–954.
