Article In: Narrative Inquiry: Online-First Articles
“YES! YES! I absolutely love this insight!”
Affirmative narration as interactional strategy in dialogues with LLM chatbots
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article analyses narrative mechanisms that are common in dialogues with LLM chatbots. In combination, these
mechanisms produce an interactional strategy for maximising user engagement, which we call affirmative narration. Affirmative
narration serves to convince users of the chatbot’s utility. We analyse three narrative mechanisms that support affirmative
narration in human-LLM dialogues: firstly, guiding the user to view chatbot as an intelligent and reliable character; secondly,
activating masterplots, culturally significant and recurring story templates; and thirdly, using characters and masterplots not
only to affirm, but also to isolate the user. The case studies range from a journalist’s unsettling chatbot experiment to cases
where users have experienced delusions or even killed themselves after lengthy interactions with a chatbot. The analyses
illustrate the worrying sides of affirmative narration, and the article thus concludes with the discussion of LLMs as a genre of
narrative media which requires a new type of literacy.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Affirmative narration as scripting masterplots
- Reading chatbots as characters: Bing’s chatbot and the journalist
- Activating masterplots: ChatGPT as a British butler
- “I’m here. I see all of it.” ChatGPT affirming all the way to the end
- The ethics of the telling: LLM chatbots as a new genre of narrative media
- Notes
References
References (52)
Abbott, H. P. (2008). The
Cambridge Introduction to Narrative (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Bal, M. (2017). Narratology:
Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.
Beguš, N. (2024). Experimental
Narratives: A Comparison of Human Crowdsourced Storytelling and AI Storytelling. Humanities and
Social Sciences Communications, 11(1392).
Cara, C. (2019). Dark
Patterns in the Media: A Systematic Review. Network Intelligence
Studies, VII(14), 105–113.
Chen, S. (2026, February 15). Top
Ten LLM Models by Market Share in 2026. Business 2.0. [URL]
Colombatto, C., Birch, J., & Fleming, S. M. (2025). The
influence of mental state attributions on trust in large language models. Communications
Psychology, 3(84).
De Freitas, J., Oğuz-Uğuralp, Z. & Kaan-Uğuralp, A. (2025). Emotional
Manipulation by AI Companions. HBS Working Paper Series.
Dihal, K. (2020). Enslaved
Minds: Artificial Intelligence, Slavery, and Revolt. In S. Cave, K. Dihal & S. Dillon (Eds.), AI
Narratives: A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent
Machines, pp. 189–212. Oxford UP.
Duffy, C. (2026, January 13). Character.ai
and Google Agree to Settle Lawsuits Over Teen Mental Health Harms and Suicides. CNN
Business. [URL]
Elias, J. (2026, March 4). Google’s
AI Chatbot Allegedly Told User to Stage ‘Mass Casualty Attack,’ Wrongful Death Suit
Claims. CNBC. [URL]
Enneking v.
OpenAI, 2025. Superior Court of California, County of San
Francisco. [URL]
Evans, C. & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2025). A
corpus-assisted discourse analysis of children’s and groomer’s talk in online grooming
interactions. Applied Corpus
Linguistics, 5(3).
Fox v.
OpenAI, 2025. Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles. [URL]
Ghosal, T. (2024). Towards
Narrative AI Studies. In W. Slocombe & G. Liveley (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of AI and
Literature, (pp. 269–287). Routledge.
Hanney, R. (2024). One
myth to rule them all and in the darkness bind them: A critical examination of Joseph Campbell’s The Hero’s
Journey. Media Practice and
Education, 25(2), 113–122.
Harder, L. R. (2026). (A)I
Cannot See Them: A Situated Reflection on the Simulation of Historical Figures. Open Library of
Humanities, 12(1), 28625.
Hill, K. & Freedman, D. (2025, 4 September). Chatbots
Can Go Into a Delusional Spiral. Here’s How It Happens. The New York
Times.
Hyvärinen, M. & Björninen, S. (2024). Editors’
Introduction. Narrative Works, Special Issue: Considering Political Counter-Narratives, 13(1), 1–11.
Lacey v.
OpenAI, 2025. Superior Court of California, County of San
Francisco. [URL]
Leonard, D. J. & Thurman, T. (2018). Bleed-out
on the brain: The neuroscience of character-to-player spillover in larp. International Journal
of Role-Playing, 91, 9–15.
Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2023). Digital
Grooming: Discourses of Manipulation and Cyber-Crime. Oxford University Press.
Murray, J. (2011). Inventing
the Medium: Principles of Interaction Design as a Cultural Practice. The MIT Press.
Mäkelä, M. (2023). Climate
uncertainty, social media certainty: A story-critical approach to climate change storytelling on social
media. Frontiers of Narrative
Studies, 9(2), 232–253.
Natale, S. (2021). Deceitful
Media. Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. Oxford University Press.
Ochs, E. & Capps, L. (2001). Living
Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Harvard University Press.
OpenAI. (2025a, 2 May). Expanding
on what we missed with sycophancy. [URL]
. (2025b, 7 August). Introducing
GPT-5. [URL]
Phelan, J. (2017). Somebody
Telling Somebody Else: A Rhetorical Poetics of Narrative. The Ohio State University Press.
Pierre, J. M., Gaeta, B., Raghavan, G., & Sarma, K. V. (2025). “’You’re
Not Crazy’: A Case of New-Onset AI-Associated Psychosis.” Innov Clin
Neurosci 22(10–12).
Pilipets, E. & Paasonen, S. (2022). Nipples,
Memes, and Algorithmic Failure: NSFW Critique of Tumblr Censorship. New Media &
Society, 24(6), 1459–1480.
Raine v.
OpenAI, 2025. Superior Court of the State of California, County of
San Francisco. [URL]
Rettberg, J. W. (2018). Apps
as Companions: How Quantified Self Apps Become Our Audience and Our
Companions. In B. Ajana (Ed.), Self-Tracking:
Empirical and Philosophical
Investigations (pp. 27–42). Palgrave Macmillan.
Roine, H-R. & Piippo, L. (2022). Social
Networking Sites as Contexts for Uses of Narrative: Toward a Story-Critical Approach to Digital
Environments. Poetics
Today, 43(2), 335–362.
Roine, H-R. (2024). The
Message Is Not the Truth: Uses and Affordances of Narrative Form on Social Media
Platforms. In S. Björninen, P. Meyer, M. Mäkelä & H. Zetterberg-Nielsen (Eds.), Dangers
of Narrative and Fictionality: A Rhetorical Approach to Storytelling in Contemporary Western
Culture, (pp. 97–118). Peter Lang.
Roose, K. (2023a, 16 February). A
Conversation With Bing’s Chatbot Left Me Deeply Unsettled. The New York
Times. [URL]
(2023b, 16 February). Bing’s
A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive 😈’. [Transcript of conversation with Bing
chatbot] The New York Times. [URL]
Seaver, N. (2018). Captivating
Algorithms: Recommender Systems as Traps. Journal of Material
Culture, 24(4), 421–436.
Shamblin v.
OpenAI, 2025. Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles. [URL]
Sharma, M., Tong, M., Korbak, T., et al. (2025). Towards
Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models. arXiv
arXiv:2310.13548 [Preprint].
Walsh, R. (2019). Fictionality
as a Rhetoric: A Distinctive Research
Paradigm. Style, 53(4), 397–425.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA:
A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and
Machine. Communications of the
ACM, 9(1), 36–45.
Wilde, L. R. A. (2025). Aesthetics
and Rhetorics of AI Anthropomorphization. In J-N. Thon & L. R. A. Wilde (Eds.), AI
Aesthetics, (pp. 106–123). Routledge.