Article published In: Narrative Inquiry: Online-First Articles
Temporalities of meaning making
Narrative productions of place and identity in rural Uganda and China
Published online: 17 September 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25160.ho
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.25160.ho
Abstract
Presenting two cases of rural communities in Uganda and China, this study explores time-space relations in
narrative productions of place and identity. Drawing on walking interviews with youth in these communities conducted as part of a
larger sociolinguistic research project on digital storytelling about local places, the notion of chronotopes is used as
theoretical lens to understand how narratives of place are embedded in multiple scales and time-spaces of rurality and
development. Findings show how relations between time-space are constructed in the talk of the youth in different ways, for
example, either laminated to produce new hybrid spaces and identities or demarcated to reinforce distinctions between old/new,
rural/urban. We discuss how a chronotopic lens can be used to understand sociolinguistics of mobility from a local perspective by
illuminating the relations between the histories of places in relation to trajectories of change and development.
Keywords: narrative analysis, chronotopes, place and identity, rurality
Article outline
- Introduction
- Spatial-temporal dimensions of meaning making
- Chronotopic relations in narrative
- Methodology
- Research sites
- The Ugandan site
- The Chinese site
- Data collection
- Data analysis
- Research sites
- Findings
- Narratives of place in the Ugandan village
- Positioning with different scales of Chronotopes in the forest
- Narrative juxtaposition of time-spaces and hybrid rural identities
- Narratives of place in the Chinese village
- Competing narratives of rurality in the new village
- New developments and rural (im)mobility
- Narratives of place in the Ugandan village
- Discussion
References
References (44)
Agha, A. (2007). Recombinant
selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language &
Communication, 27(3), 320–335.
Al-Alawi, W. (2023). English
at the center of the periphery: ‘Chicken nuggets’, chronotopes, and scaling English in Bahraini
youth. Language in
Society, 52(4), 645–667.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The
dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small
stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text &
Talk, 28(3).
Banda, F., & Jimaima, H. (2015). The
semiotic ecology of linguistic landscapes in rural Zambia. Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 19(5), 643–670.
Banda, F., Jimaima, H., & Mokwena, L. (2018). Semiotic
remediation of Chinese signage in the linguistic landscapes of two rural areas of
Zambia. In A. Sherris & E. Adami (Eds.), Making
signs, translanguaging ethnographies: Exploring urban, rural and educational
spaces (p. 74). Multilingual Matters.
Basterretxea Santiso, G. (2025). Linguistic
landscape in a rural Basque area: a case study in Ondarroa. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 22(2), 209–227.
Ben-Rafael, E., & Ben-Rafael, M. (2015). Linguistic
landscapes in an era of multiple globalizations. Linguistic
Landscape, 1(1–2), 19–37.
(2015). Chronotopes,
scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of
Anthropology, 44(1), 105–116.
Blommaert, J., & De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic
identities: On the spacetime organization of who we are. In A. De Fina, D. Ikizoglu, & J. Wegner (Eds.), Diversity
and superdiversity: Sociocultural linguistic
perspectives (pp. 1–15). Georgetown University Press.
Borba, R., Fabrício, B. F., & Lima, F. (2022). ‘Living
memories of the changing same’: Rio’s linguistic landscape at the crossroads of time and
race. Language in
Society, 51(5), 797–818.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity
and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse
studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Cornips, L., & de Rooij, V. A. (Eds.). (2018). The
sociolinguistics of place and belonging: Perspectives from the
margins (Vol. 45). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Crossley, S. (2007). A
chronotopic approach to genre analysis: An exploratory study. English for Specific
Purposes, 26(1), 4–24.
De Fina, A. (2009). Narratives
in interview — The case of accounts: For an interactional approach to narrative
genres. Narrative
inquiry, 19(2), 233–258.
(2015). Narrative
analysis. In Z. Hua (Ed.), Research
methods in intercultural communication: A practical
guide (pp. 327–342). Wiley-Blackwell.
(2021). Doing
narrative analysis from a narratives-as-practices perspective. Narrative
Inquiry, 31(1), 49–71.
(2023). ‘I
especially loved the little Nana dancing on the balcony’: The emergence, formation, and circulation of chronotopes in
mass-mediated communication. Language in
Society, 52(4), 669–689.
(2025). Bonding
with followers: Chronotopes and scales in political communication on Instagram. Discourse
Studies, 27(2), 192–213.
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Analysing
narratives as practices. Qualitative
Research, 8(3), 379–387.
Dong, J. (2021). ‘Labor
is the most glorious’: Chronotopic linguistic landscaping and the making of working class
identities. Language &
Communication, 80, 1–10.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2003). Plotting
the “Right Place” and the “Right Time”: Place and Time as Interactional Resources in
Narrative. Narrative
Inquiry, 13(2), 413–432.
Halfacree, K. (2017). Rethinking
‘rurality’. In T. Champion & G. Hugo (Eds.), New
forms of urbanization: Beyond the urban-rural
dichotomy (pp. 285–304). Routledge.
Huang, Y., Hui, E. C., Zhou, J., Lang, W., Chen, T., & Li, X. (2020). Rural
revitalization in China: Land-use optimization through the practice of place-making. Land Use
Policy, 97, 104788.
Karimzad, F. (2020). Metapragmatics
of normalcy: Mobility, context, and language choice. Language &
Communication, 70, 107–118.
Koh, J., & De Fina, A. (2026). Drama,
dialogicity and personalization in the circulation of a viral TikTok story: a narrative-as-practice approach to online
retellings. Discourse, Context &
Media, 69, 100973.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative
analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays
on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring
meeting (pp. 12–44). University of Washington Press.
Leander, K. M. (2004). “They
took out the wrong context”: Uses of time-space in the practice of
positioning. Ethos, 32(2), 188–213.
Lyons, K., & Karimzad, F. (2019). Chronotopeography:
Nostalgia and modernity in South Delhi’s linguistic landscape. Sociolinguistic
Studies, 13(1), 83–105.
Ndzendze, B., & Mulugeta, M. (2023). Made
in Uganda by China: Chinese industrial parks in Uganda. In B. Ndzendze & D. Monyae (Eds.), Perspectives
on Africa-China infrastructural and industrial cooperation: Empirical findings and conceptual
implications (pp. 135–149). Springer.
Nikolaidou, Z. (2026). “My
maternal home, like my mother’s place”: Spatial meaning-making and narrative contestation in the asylum
process. Narrative Inquiry.
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2014). Metrolingual
multitasking and spatial repertoires: ‘Pizza mo two minutes coming’. Journal of
sociolinguistics, 18(2), 161–184.
Pietikäinen, S. (2014). Spatial
interaction in Sámiland: Regulative and transitory chronotopes in the dynamic multilingual landscape of an indigenous Sámi
village. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 18(5), 478–490.
Salo, H. (2012). Using
linguistic landscape to examine the visibility of Sámi languages in the North
Calotte. In D. Gorter, H. F. Marten, & L. Van Mensel (Eds.), Minority
languages in the linguistic
landscape (pp. 243–259). Palgrave Macmillan.
Schiffrin, D. (2009). Crossing
boundaries: The nexus of time, space, person, and place in narrative. Language in
Society, 38(4), 421–445.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses
in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The
new mobilities paradigm. Environment and planning
A, 38(2), 207–226.
Stroud, C., & Jegels, D. (2014). Semiotic
landscapes and mobile narrations of place: Performing the local. International Journal of the
Sociology of
Language, 2014(228), 179–199.
Szabó, T. P., & Troyer, R. A. (2017). Inclusive
ethnographies: Beyond the binaries of observer and observed in linguistic landscape
studies. Linguistic
Landscape, 3(3), 306–326.
Thurlow, C., Pellanda, A., & Wohlgemuth, L. (2022). The
discursive chronotopes of waste: Temporal laminations and linguistic hauntings. Language in
society, 51(5), 819–837.
Torn, A. (2011). Chronotopes
of madness and recovery: A challenge to narrative linearity. Narrative
Inquiry, 21(1), 130–150.