Cover not available
Part of
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 135–

Brokering co-participants’ volition in request and offer sequences

| University of Helsinki
This chapter examines multilingual interactions where bilingual participants engage in advancing mutual understanding between other participants by language brokering (e.g. Bolden 2012) requests and offers from Finnish to Brazilian Portuguese. Brokering turns involve either (i) declarative statements regarding the prior speaker’s volition towards the requested/offered matter or (ii) questions concerning the recipient’s volition. The use of these formats displays the broker’s intersubjective interpretation of locally relevant features of the action, such as the distribution of benefits and agency, and contingencies in its realization. The investigation of language brokering in this context also contributes to research on requests, offers and related social actions (e.g. Couper-Kuhlen 2014), action ascription (Levinson 2013; Deppermann & Haugh forthcoming), and on verbs expressing volition (Sacks 1992: 181; Schulze-Wenck 2005).
Keywords: language brokering, multilingual, volition, request, offer, beneficiary, agent, action ascription, question, third person, recipiency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Wanting something: Volition in the transfer of objects and services
  • 3.Three types of brokering
    • 3.1Brokering prior action as a request
    • 3.2Brokering prior action as an offer
    • 3.3Somewhere between requests and offers
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 17 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.326.07har
References
Antonini, Rachele
2010 “The Study of Child Language Brokering: Past, Current and Emerging Research.” MediAzoni 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2012 “Across Languages and Cultures: Brokering Problems of Understanding in Conversational Repair.” Language in Society 41: 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin
2019 “Telling the Other’s Side: Formulating Others’ Mental States in Driver Training.” Language & Communication 65: 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1998 “ ‘Irrealis’ as a Grammatical Category.” Anthropological Linguistics 40 (2): 257–288.Google Scholar
Childs, Carrie
2012a “’I’m Not X, I Just Want Y’: Formulating ‘Wants’ in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 14 (2): 181–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “Directing and Requesting: Two Interactive Uses of the Mental State Terms Want and Need.” Text & Talk 32 (6): 727–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2014 “Benefactors and Beneficiaries. Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014 “What Does Grammar Tell Us about Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki
2014 “On Divisions of Labor in Request and Offer Environments.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 115–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S.
2006 “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1257–1280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2), 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011 “The Study of Formulations as a Key to Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34 (2): 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “How Does ’Cognition’ Matter to the Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction?” Language Sciences 34: 746–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “ ‘Don’t Get Me Wrong’: Recipient Design by Using Negation to Constrain an Action’s Interpretation.” In Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, ed. by Susanne Günther, Wolfgang Imo, and Jörg Bücker, 15–52. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Michael Haugh
forthcoming). “Action Ascription in Social Interaction.” In Action Ascription. Interaction in Context ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh Cambridge Cambridge University Press DOI logo
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Julia Kaiser
forthcoming). “Achieving the Intersubjectivity of Action and Enabling Coordination: Intention Ascriptions in Second Position with Du Willst/Sie Wollen (‘you want’) in German.” In Action Ascription. Interaction in Context ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds) 2014 Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter
2005 “Discursive Psychology, Mental States and Descriptions.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 241–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax. An Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harjunpää, Katariina
2017a “Translatory Practices in Everyday Conversation. Bilingual Mediating in Finnish–Brazilian Portuguese Interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2017b “Mediated questions in Multilingual Conversation: Organizing Participation through Question Design.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 75–102. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and D.R. Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30 (3/4): 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1971 Implicative Verbs. Language 47 (2): 340–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam, and Laura Versante
2003 “Pointing by Hand in ‘Neopolitan’”. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 109–137. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen
2012 “Linguistic and Embodied Formats for Making (Concrete) Offers.” Discourse Studies, 14 (5): 587–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lev, Michael
2014 “The Nanti Realis Status System.” Linguistic Typology 18 (2): 251–288.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013 “Action Formation and Ascription.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies in the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “Requesting Immediate Action in The Surgical Operation Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting In Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 267–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research On Language And Social Interaction, 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase
2014 “Epistemic Brokering in the Interpreter-Mediated Medical Visit: Negotiating ‘Patient’s Side’ and ‘Doctor’s Side’ Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (4): 426–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2015: The Request System in Italian Interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni, and Jörg Zinken
2017 “Social Agency and Grammar.” In Distributed Agency, ed. By Nick J. Enfield, and Paul Kockelman, 79–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schulze-Wenck, Stephanie
2005 “Form and Function of ‘First Verbs’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 319–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skårup, Terkel
2004 “Brokering and Membership in a Multilingual Community of Practice.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 40–57. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Raevaara, Liisa
2014 “On the Grammatical Form of Requests at the Convenience Store: Requesting as Embodied Action.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 243–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2011 “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2016 Requesting for Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lindholm, Camilla, Jenny Paananen, Melisa Stevanovic, Elina Weiste & Taina Valkeapää
2023. Requests for concrete actions in interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.