Chapter published in:
Intersubjectivity in Action: Studies in language and social interaction
Edited by Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 326] 2021
► pp. 135159
References

References

Antonini, Rachele
2010 “The Study of Child Language Brokering: Past, Current and Emerging Research.” MediAzoni 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2012 “Across Languages and Cultures: Brokering Problems of Understanding in Conversational Repair.” Language in Society 41: 97–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal, and Lena Levin
2019 “Telling the Other’s Side: Formulating Others’ Mental States in Driver Training.” Language & Communication 65: 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1998 “ ‘Irrealis’ as a Grammatical Category.” Anthropological Linguistics 40 (2): 257–288.Google Scholar
Childs, Carrie
2012a “’I’m Not X, I Just Want Y’: Formulating ‘Wants’ in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 14 (2): 181–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “Directing and Requesting: Two Interactive Uses of the Mental State Terms Want and Need.” Text & Talk 32 (6): 727–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage
2014 “Benefactors and Beneficiaries. Benefactive Status and Stance in the Management of Offers and Requests.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014 “What Does Grammar Tell Us about Action?” Pragmatics 24 (3): 623–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Marja Etelämäki
2014 “On Divisions of Labor in Request and Offer Environments.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 115–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S.
2006 “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 1257–1280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S., and Paul Drew
2008 “Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2), 129–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2011 “The Study of Formulations as a Key to Interactional Semantics.” Human Studies 34 (2): 115–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “How Does ’Cognition’ Matter to the Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction?” Language Sciences 34: 746–767. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “ ‘Don’t Get Me Wrong’: Recipient Design by Using Negation to Constrain an Action’s Interpretation.” In Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, ed. by Susanne Günther, Wolfgang Imo, and Jörg Bücker, 15–52. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Michael Haugh
forthcoming). “Action Ascription in Social Interaction.” In Action Ascription. Interaction in Context ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Julia Kaiser
forthcoming). “Achieving the Intersubjectivity of Action and Enabling Coordination: Intention Ascriptions in Second Position with Du Willst/Sie Wollen (‘you want’) in German.” In Action Ascription. Interaction in Context ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, and Michael Haugh Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds) 2014Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter
2005 “Discursive Psychology, Mental States and Descriptions.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 241–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax. An Introduction. Volume I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harjunpää, Katariina
2017a “Translatory Practices in Everyday Conversation. Bilingual Mediating in Finnish–Brazilian Portuguese Interaction.” Ph.D. dissertation. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
2017b “Mediated questions in Multilingual Conversation: Organizing Participation through Question Design.” In Linking Clauses and Actions in Social Interaction, ed. by Ritva Laury, Marja Etelämäki, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 75–102. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and D.R. Watson
1980 “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30 (3/4): 245–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1971Implicative Verbs. Language 47 (2): 340–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam, and Laura Versante
2003 “Pointing by Hand in ‘Neopolitan’”. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet, ed. by Sotaro Kita, 109–137. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise, and Tiina Keisanen
2012 “Linguistic and Embodied Formats for Making (Concrete) Offers.” Discourse Studies, 14 (5): 587–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lev, Michael
2014 “The Nanti Realis Status System.” Linguistic Typology 18 (2): 251–288.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2013 “Action Formation and Ascription.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna
2005 “Language as Social Action: A Study of How Senior Citizens Request Assistance with Practical Tasks in the Swedish Home Help Service.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies in the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 209–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2014 “Requesting Immediate Action in The Surgical Operation Room: Time, Embodied Resources and Praxeological Embeddedness.” In Requesting In Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 267–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research On Language And Social Interaction, 51 (1): 85–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Chase
2014 “Epistemic Brokering in the Interpreter-Mediated Medical Visit: Negotiating ‘Patient’s Side’ and ‘Doctor’s Side’ Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (4): 426–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni
2015: The Request System in Italian Interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. Nijmegen: Radboud University.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni, and Jörg Zinken
2017 “Social Agency and Grammar.” In Distributed Agency, ed. By Nick J. Enfield, and Paul Kockelman, 79–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schulze-Wenck, Stephanie
2005 “Form and Function of ‘First Verbs’ in Talk-in-Interaction.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen, and Margret Selting, 319–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skårup, Terkel
2004 “Brokering and Membership in a Multilingual Community of Practice.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner, and Johannes Wagner, 40–57. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, and Raevaara, Liisa
2014 “On the Grammatical Form of Requests at the Convenience Store: Requesting as Embodied Action.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 243–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2011 “Participants’ Deontic Rights and Action Formation: The Case of Declarative Requests for Action.” Interaction and Linguistic Structures 52. Available at: http://​www​.inlist​.uni​-bayreuth​.de​/issues​/52​/Inlist52​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2016Requesting for Responsibility. The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar