In:Informality in Japanese: Getting close in a formal context
Edited by Haruko Minegishi Cook and Momoko Nakamura
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 357] 2027
► pp. 50–70
Chapter 3Making connections
Reported speech, repetition, eccentric metaphor, and other resources in research interview discourse
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates that even in institutional and formal contexts, participants can and do make emotional connections with each other. In my data of two-party research interviews, I observed some recurrent linguistic elements in moments of such connection: (1) reported speech, (2) repetition, and (3) eccentric metaphors. However, these linguistic strategies did not create emotional connections in isolation. Rather, extralinguistic factors such as the interlocutors’ mutual familiarity as members of the same professional networks and camaraderie based on similar professional and personal experiences, and accompanying semiotic features such as empathetic facial expressions, smiles, and laughter helped the interview participants make stories come alive and engage the other participant more fully. In other words, the participants successfully achieved emotional connection because they employed multilevel and multimodal (extralinguistic, visual, paralinguistic, and linguistic) resources in a concerted manner.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Research interviews: Collaboration, institutionality, formality, and connection
- 3.Data
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Emotional connections
- 4.2External factors and non-linguistic semiotic resources
- 4.3Linguistic resources
- 4.3.1Reported speech (or constructed dialogue)
- 4.3.2Repetition
- 4.3.3Eccentric metaphor
- 5.Discussion and conclusion
- Author queries
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (28)
Alsaawi, Ali. 2014. “A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews.” European Journal of Business and Social Sciences 3 (4): 149–156.
Antaki, Charles. 2009. “The Uses of Absurdity.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 85–102. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bochner, Arthur P., and Nicholas A. Riggs. 2014. “Practicing Narrative Inquiry.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. by Patricia Leavy, 95–222. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Connelly, F. Michael, and D. Jean Clandinin. 1990. “Stories of Experience and Narrative Inquiry.” Educational Researcher 19 (5): 2–14.
Cook, M. Haruko. 1996. “Japanese Language Socialization: Indexing the Modes of Self.” Discourse Processes 22: 171–197.
. 1998. “Situational Meaning of the Japanese Social Deixis: The Mixed Use of the Masu and Plain Forms.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8 (1): 87–110.
. 2011. “Are Honorifics Polite? Uses of Referent Honorifics in a Japanese Committee Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (15): 3655–3672.
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. “Variation and the Indexical Field.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 12 (4): 453–476.
. 2016. “Variation, Meaning and Social Change.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, ed. by Nicholas Coupland, 68–85. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, Rosalind, and Janet Holland. 2013. What Is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hak, Tony. 2009. “Interviewer Laughter as an Unspecified Request for Clarification.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 200–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2013. Japanese. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1984. “On Laughter in Pursuit of Intimacy.” Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica, Università di Urbino: Working Papers and Pre-publications No. 135. [URL]
Kanno, Yasuko. 2003. Negotiating Bilingual and Bicultural Identities: Japanese Returnees betwixt Two Worlds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kim, Jeong-Hee. 2015. Understanding Narrative Inquiry: The Crafting and Analysis of Stories as Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mann, Steve. 2016. The Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Okamoto, Shigeko, and Janet S. Shibamoto-Smith. 2016. The Social Life of the Japanese Language: Cultural Discourse and Situated Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sarangi, Srikant. 2009. “Institutional, Professional, and Lifeworld Frames in Interview Talk.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell, and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 64–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Suzuki, Satoko. 2023. “Identity Presentations of L1-Japanese Female Professors in the United States.” Journal of Language, Identity & Education.
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative.” In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 311–360. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 1987. “Repetition in Conversation: Toward a Poetics of Talk.” Language 63 (3): 574–605. [URL]
