Eveline T. Feteris
List of John Benjamins publications for which Eveline T. Feteris plays a role.
Book series
ISSN 1877-6884
Title
Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren
Edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
[Not in series, 163] 2011. vi, 283 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Articles
2017 Chapter 8. Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 125–138
Chapter
2017 Chapter 5. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 71–91
Chapter
2017 The identification of prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 44–58
In this contribution I identify prototypical patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. From a pragma-dialectical perspective, I explain the nature and rationale for the argumentative patterns from the perspective of the institutional function of legal justification and I distinguish… read more | Article
2017 Chapter 4. The role of the judge in legal proceedings: A pragma-dialectical analysis Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 59–76
Chapter
2015 A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 99–120
In this contribution I discuss the role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals and values in complex structures of legal justification. From a pragma-dialectical perspective I describe the stereotypical patterns of legal justification in hard cases and specify the different… read more | Article
2012 Chapter 9. Strategic manoeuvring in the case of the ‘Unworthy spouse’ Exploring Argumentative Contexts, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 149–164
In this contribution I give an analysis of strategic manoeuvring in a legal context. I give an analysis of the argumentation in the justification of the decision by the Dutch Supreme Court in the famous case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’ and I describe how the Supreme Court operates strategically within… read more | Article
2012 The role of the judge in legal proceedings: A Pragma-dialectical analysis Journal of Argumentation in Context 1:2, pp. 234–252
In this contribution I characterize the role of the judge in the context of the argumentative activity of legal proceeding. I describe the role of the judge from a pragma-dialectical perspective and explain in which way this role promotes a rational resolution of the dispute. I specify how a… read more | Article
2011 Introduction Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 1–4
Article
2011 Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 59–74
Article
2009 Strategic manoeuvring in the justification of judicial decisions Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 93–114
Article