Nanon Labrie
List of John Benjamins publications for which Nanon Labrie plays a role.
Journal
ISSN 2211-4742 | E-ISSN 2211-4750
Titles
Argumentative Style: A pragma-dialectical study of functional variety in argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context, 20] 2022. x, 332 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie
[Not in series, 235] 2021. x, 155 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Argumentation and Patient Centered Care
Edited by Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 7:2 (2018) vi, 132 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Articles
2020 A Dutch dose of dissent: Exploring the role of gender, education, and culture on Dutch students’ argumentative predispositions Journal of Argumentation in Context 9:2, pp. 219–242
The Dutch are often thought of as direct, verbally aggressive, and argumentative. Yet, evidence for this stereotype is lacking. This study explores argumentative predispositions in the Netherlands. In a survey, Dutch students’ (N = 133) argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, argument frames, and… read more | Article
2019 Chapter 13. Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer: An observational content analysis Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 237–266
Chapter
2019 “Doctor, I disagree”: Development and preliminary validation of a patient argumentativeness scale Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3, pp. 336–353
In medical consultations, disagreements may arise. Yet, patients’ predisposition to engage in a discussion with their doctors to resolve these disagreements may vary. This study aims to develop and validate a measurement tool to assess patient argumentativeness (P-ARG) in general practice. Starting… read more | Article
2018 The stereotypicality of symptomatic and pragmatic argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer Argumentation and Patient Centered Care, Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie (eds.), pp. 181–203
A recent line of argumentation research has focused on the examination of prototypical argumentative patterns – patterns that can be theoretically expected in view of the type of standpoint defended, the institutional aim, and the conventions and constraints of the context (Van Eemeren 2016: 13–15). read more | Article
2018 Argumentation and patient centered care Argumentation and Patient Centered Care, Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca, Roosmaryn Pilgram and Nanon Labrie (eds.), pp. 117–119
Introduction
2013 Strategically eliciting concessions from patients in treatment decision-making discussions Journal of Argumentation in Context 2:3, pp. 322–341
In this paper it is examined how doctors may strategically elicit concessions from their patients in order to create a favorable point of departure for the treatment decision-making discussion. Using the dialectical profile for establishing starting points in an argumentative discussion (van… read more | Article