Bart Garssen
List of John Benjamins publications for which Bart Garssen plays a role.
Book series
ISSN 1877-6884
Journal
ISSN 2211-4742 | E-ISSN 2211-4750
Titles
Argumentative Style: A pragma-dialectical study of functional variety in argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Sara Greco, Ton van Haaften, Nanon Labrie, Fernando Leal and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context, 20] 2022. x, 332 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Argumentation in European Politics
Edited by Corina Andone and Bart Garssen
Special issue of Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:1 (2022) v, 155 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients: Understanding clinical argumentative discourse
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie
[Not in series, 235] 2021. x, 155 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context, 17] 2019. xiv, 336 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Pragmatics
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context, 9] 2015. ix, 343 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Exploring Argumentative Contexts
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context, 4] 2012. xx, 398 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren
Edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
[Not in series, 163] 2011. vi, 283 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics
Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies, 6] 2008. xiii, 278 pp.
Subjects Communication Studies | Discourse studies | Philosophy | Pragmatics | Sociolinguistics and Dialectology
Articles
2022. Introduction. Argumentation in European Politics, Andone, Corina and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 1–5
Introduction
2022. The argumentative style of the opening speech of a debate in the European Parliament. Argumentation in European Politics, Andone, Corina and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 47–68
In this contribution a characterization is given of the argumentative style utilised in an opening speech of a plenary debate in the European Parliament. This debate is initiated through an opening speech in which the rapporteur of a parliamentary committee presents the European Commission’s… read more | Article
2019. Chapter 1. A collection of studies of argumentation in practice. Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 1–12
Chapter
2019. Chapter 17. And then you are left holding the baby!: Strategic manoeuvring with the argumentum ad consequentiam. Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 321–334
Chapter
2017. The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. Context-dependency of Argumentative Patterns, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 27–43
This paper focuses on the role of the argument by example in the argumentation put forward by Members of the European Parliament. The argumentative patterns that come into being in legislative debates in the European Parliament depend for the most part on the problem-solving argumentation that is… read more | Article
2017. Chapter 7. Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 109–124
Chapter
2017. Chapter 9. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary debate. Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peng Wu (eds.), pp. 145–158
Chapter
2017. Chapter 3. The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European Parliament. Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Eemeren, Frans H. van (ed.), pp. 31–51
Chapter
2015. The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 313–326
Ad baculum threats can be seen as a mode of strategic maneuvering which takes on a reasonable appearance in real life situations when it mimics, legitimate pragmatic argumentation. In this paper the hypothesis was tested that ad baculum fallacies are seen as less unreasonable than clear cases when… read more | Article
2015. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. Argumentation in Political Deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 33–46
This chapter focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. A parliamentary debate is a distinct argumentative activity type. In the pragma-dialectical approach, argumentative activity types are defined as conventionalized argumentative practices in which… read more | Article
2013. Strategic maneuvering in European Parliamentary Debate. Argumentation in political deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 33–46
This paper focuses on argumentation the institutional context of debate in the European Parliament. A parliamentary debate is a distinct argumentative activity type. In the pragma-dialectical approach, argumentative activity types are defined as conventionalized argumentative practices in which the… read more | Article
2012. Introduction. Exploring Argumentative Contexts, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. xiii–xx
Article
2012. Chapter 3. Exploiting the room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Dealing with audience demand in the European Parliament. Exploring Argumentative Contexts, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 43–58
The room for strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse depends not only on the dialectical and rhetorical preconditions inherent in strategic maneuvering but also on various kinds of extrinsic preconditions imposed on strategic maneuvering by the institutional macro-context of the… read more | Article
2011. Introduction. Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 1–4
Article
2011. Figurative analogy in political argumentation. Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 39–58
Article
2009. Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. Discourse, of Course: An overview of research in discourse studies, Renkema, Jan (ed.), pp. 171–184
Article
2008. Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 1–26
Article
2008. Reasonableness in confrontation: Empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 181–195
Article
2005. 22. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectal freedom rule. Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser (eds.), pp. 349–365
Chapter