Marianne Doury
List of John Benjamins publications for which Marianne Doury plays a role.
Book series
ISSN 1877-6884
Articles
2022 Prescribed argumentation, actual argumentation, reported argumentation: The management of argumentation in a public debate in France Argumentation in European Politics, Andone, Corina and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 133–155
This article starts from the observation that, in order to ensure their legitimacy, the modes of governance in place in most Western democracies make more room for citizen participation in decision-making processes. The result is the implementation of various participatory mechanisms, many of which… read more | Article
2019 Chapter 2. Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation: A clear-cut opposition or two poles on a continuous line? Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 13–32
Chapter
2015 The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation: The conférence de citoyens and the débat public on nanotechnologies in France Argumentation in Political Deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 75–100
In this chapter, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conférence de citoyens) and public hearing (débat public). While both methods are used in order to involve the public in decision making about science and technology policy, they differ in a number of… read more | Article
2015 The psychiatrization of the opponent in polemical context Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (eds.), pp. 217–232
A variant of the ad hominem argument amounts to challenging the opponent’s mental health. Semi-technical designations borrowed from psychiatric paradigms (such as autistic, paranoiac, hysterical) are thus appealed to in order to qualify the opponent. Based on three examples from polemical… read more | Article
2013 The place of counter discourse in two methods of public deliberation: The conférence de citoyens and the débat public on nanotechnologies in France Argumentation in political deliberation, Lewiński, Marcin and Dima Mohammed (eds.), pp. 75–100
In this paper, we examine two methods of public participation, namely consensus conference (conférence de citoyens) and public hearing (débat public). While both methods are used in order to involve the public in decision making about science and technology policy, they differ in a number of… read more | Article
2011 Strategic maneuvering in critical reactions to pragmatic argumentation: The case of Henry Porter contra Tony Blair Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Feteris, Eveline T., Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), pp. 21–38
Article
2005 10. The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation Argumentation in Practice, Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser (eds.), pp. 145–161
Chapter