Cover not available

Article In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

Addressing trust and distrust in artificial intelligence in newspaper texts

A discourse linguistic investigation

ORCiD logo with link | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
 | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Trust in new technologies is often seen as a key condition for their implementation in everyday life, as the aim is for users to utilise technical innovations without strong reservations. The aspect of trust also plays a fundamental role in the discourse on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its far-reaching consequences for people’s lives. In this context, journalistic reporting as part of the public discourse plays a considerable role in creating trust or distrust in AI as a new technology. Whether and how trust issues are addressed in journalistic reporting has not been investigated so far.
The paper explores how AI is depicted in German journalistic coverage, covering the topics of autonomous driving and smart home systems, which we expected to generate diverging trust issues. Furthermore, we show how trustworthiness and untrustworthiness are constructed in those texts, choosing AI applications intended for everyday use and therefore relying on trust from users (Tschopp, Marisa, Marc Ruef, and Dagmar Monett. 2022. “Vertrauen Sie KI? Einblicke in das Thema Künstliche Intelligenz und warum Vertrauen eine Schlüsselrolle im Umgang mit neuen Technologien spielt.” In Kreativität und Innovation in Organisationen, ed. by Miriam Landes, Eberhard Steiner, and Tatjana Utz, 319–346. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar; Gillespie, Nicole, Steve Lockey, and Caitlin Curtis. 2021. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Five Country Study. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland and KPMG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). We carried out a qualitative linguistic content analysis on a corpus of German press texts from 2023 that are dedicated to the aforementioned topics. We focused our analysis on explicit and implicit trust communication in the journalistic coverage of AI and examined whether qualitative differences can be identified in the way trust or distrust is addressed in various sub-discourses.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Trust, trustworthiness and mediation of trust(worthiness)
  • 3.Methodological approach
  • 4.Findings
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • 6.Limitations
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
References (42)
References
Baer, Michael D., and Jason A. Colquitt. 2018. “Why Do People Trust?: Moving toward a More Comprehensive Consideration of the Antecedents of Trust”. In The Routledge Companion to Trust, ed. by Rosalind H. Searle, Ann-Marie Nienaber, and Sim B. Sitkin, 163–182. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belosevic, Milena. 2021. “Vertrauensrelevantes Wissen und Diskurssemantik: eine diskurslinguistische Annäherung an das Konzept Vertrauen.” Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik 74: 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Vertrauen und Misstrauen in der Flüchtlingsdebatte 2015–2017: Eine diskurslinguistische Untersuchung von Argumentationsmustern. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 2004. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertelsmann-Stiftung. 2017. Automatisiertes Fahren: Aktuelle Einstellungen in Deutschland. [URL]. Last Access on July 30th, 2026.
Blöbaum, Bernd. 2016. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World: Models and Concepts of Trust Research. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. Trust and Communication. Finding and Implications of Trust Research. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Vertrauen, Misstrauen und Medien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brell, Teresa, Hannah Biermann, Ralf Philipsen, and Martina Ziefle. 2019. “Trust in Autonomous Technologies: A Contextual Comparison of Influencing User Factors.” In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust, edited by Abbas Moallem, vol. 11594. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bromme, Rainer. 2020. “Informiertes Vertrauen: Eine psychologische Perspektive auf Vertrauen in Wissenschaft.” In Wissenschaftsreflexion, ed. by Michael Jungert, 105–134. Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelke, Katherine M. 2018. Die journalistische Darstellung von Vertrauen, Misstrauen und Vertrauensproblemen im Kontext der Digitalisierung. Theoretische Entwicklung und empirische Erfassung von Vertrauensdimensions-Frames. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Felder, Ekkehard. 2018. “Wahrheit und Wissen zwischen Wirklichkeit und Konstruktion: Freiheiten und Zwänge beim sprachlichen Handeln.” In Wirklichkeit oder Konstruktion?, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, and Andreas Gardt, 371–398. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fulmer, C. Ashley, and Michele J. Gelfand. 2012. “At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels.” Journal of Management 38 (4): 1167–1230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gill, Harjinder, Kathleen Boies, Joan Finegan, and Jeffrey McNally. 2005. “Antecedents Of Trust: Establishing a Boundary Condition for the Relation between Propensity to Trust and Intention to Trust.” Journal of Business and Psychology 19 (3): 287–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gillespie, Nicole, Steve Lockey, and Caitlin Curtis. 2021. Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Five Country Study. Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland and KPMG.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IfD Allensbach. 2023. Meistgenutzte Informationsquellen der Bevölkerung in Deutschland im Jahr 2023. Chart. 19. Juni, 2023. Statista. Last Access on Oct. 17th, 2024. [URL]
Karimi, Reyhaneh, Leila Farahzadi, Samad M. E. Sepasgozar, Sharifeh Sargolzaei, Sanee M. Ebrahimzadeh Sepasgozar, Mohsen Zareian, and Akram Nasrolahi. 2021. “Smart Built Environment Including Smart Home, Smart Building and Smart City: Definitions and Applied Technologies.” In Advances and Technologies in Building Construction and Structural Analysis, ed. by Alireza Kaboli, and Sara Shirowzhan, 179–216. London: IntechOpen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, Reiner. 2018. “Diskurslinguistik und Wissenssoziologie.” In Handbuch Diskurs, ed. by Ingo H. Warnke, 30–52. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohring, Matthias. 2001. Vertrauen in Medien — Vertrauen in Technologie. Arbeitsbericht / Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg 196. Stuttgart: Akademie für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Vertrauen in Journalismus: Theorie und Empirie. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köster, Nils, and Torsten-Oliver Salge. 2021. “Paving the Way for Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: How OEMs, Authorities and Certifiers Can Foster Customers’ Trust in AVs.” In Automatisiertes Fahren 2021, ed. by Torsten Bertram, 29–39. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David J., and Andrew Weigert. 1985. “Trust as a Social Reality.” Social Forces 63: 967–985. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xin, Traci J. Hess, and Joseph S. Valacich. 2008. “Why Do We Trust New Technology? A Study of Initial Trust Formation with Organizational Information Systems.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17: 39–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maurer, Markus. 2015. “Introduction.” In Autonomous Driving. Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, ed. by Markus Maurer, Christian J. Gerdes, Barbara Lenz, and Hermann Winner, 1–8. Wiesbaden: Springer Open.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayring, Philipp, and Thomas Fenzl. 2019. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, ed. by Nina Baur, and Jörg Blasius, 633–648. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKnight, D. Harrison, and Norman L. Chervany. 2001. “Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time.” In Trust in cyber-societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, ed. by Rino Falcone, Munindar Singh, and Yao-Han Tan, 27–54. Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKnight, D. Harrison, Michelle Carter, Jason Bennett Thatcher, and Paul F. Clay. 2011. “Trust in a Specific Technology: An Investigation of Its Components and Measures.” ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 2 (2): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Möllering, Guido. 2006. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myklebust, Thor, Tor Stalhane, Gunnar D. Jenssen, and Irene Waro. 2020. “Autonomous Cars, Trust and Safety Case for the Public.” In 2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 1–6. Palm Springs, CA: IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oleson, Kristin E., D. R. Billings, Vivien Kocsis, Jessie Y. C. Chen, and Peter A. Hancock. 2011. “Antecedents of Trust in Human-Robot Collaborations”. In 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), 175–178. Miami Beach, FL: IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PytlikZillig, Lisa M., and Christopher D. Kimbrough. 2016. “Consensus on Conceptualizations and Definitions of Trust: Are We There Yet?” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, ed. by Ellie Shockley, Tess M. S. Neal, Lisa M. PytlikZillig, and Brian H. Bornstein, 17–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rousseau, Denise M., Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer. 1998. “Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schäfer, Mike S. 2016. “Mediated Trust in Science: Concept, Measurement and Perspectives for the ‘Science of Science Communication’.” JCOM — Journal of Science Communication 15 (5): C02. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoorman, F. David, Mallory M. Wood, and Christina Breuer. 2015. “Would Trust by Any Other Name Smell as Sweet? Reflections on the Meanings and Uses of Trust Across Disciplines and Context.” In Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority: The Role of Institutional Trust, ed. by Brian H. Bornstein and Alan J. Tomkins, 13–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schomakers, Eva-Maria, Hannah Biermann, and Martina Ziefle. 2020. “Understanding Privacy and Trust in Smart Home Environments.” In HCI for Cybersecurity, Privacy and Trust, Vol. 12210, ed. by Abbas Moallem, 513–532. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Söllner, Matthias, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2013. “What We Really Know About Antecedents of Trust: A Critical Review of the Empirical Information Systems Literature on Trust.” In Psychology of Trust: New Research, ed. by David Gefen, 127–155. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spieß, Constanze. 2018. “Wissenskonstitution im Diskurs.” In Handbuch Text und Gespräch, ed. by Karin Birkner, and Nina Janich, 143–168. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzmüller, Jürgen, and Ingo H. Warnke. 2008. Methoden der Diskurslinguistik: Sprachwissenschaftliche Zugänge zur transtextuellen Ebene. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tschopp, Marisa, Marc Ruef, and Dagmar Monett. 2022. “Vertrauen Sie KI? Einblicke in das Thema Künstliche Intelligenz und warum Vertrauen eine Schlüsselrolle im Umgang mit neuen Technologien spielt.” In Kreativität und Innovation in Organisationen, ed. by Miriam Landes, Eberhard Steiner, and Tatjana Utz, 319–346. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband. 2017. “Energie und Wohnen. Meinungen von Verbraucherinnen und Verbrauchern.” [URL]. Last Access on July, 30th, 2026.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue