Article published In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles
The use of stance markers for identity construction
A comparative study of Chinese hotel responses to online positive and negative reviews
Published online: 4 September 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.25160.hua
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.25160.hua
Abstract
In the hospitality sector, effectively responding to online reviews is vital for hotels to uphold their reputation
and customer rapport. Taking 120 positive review responses and 120 negative review responses from Chinese hotels on Ctrip as the
corpora, this study conducts a comparative analysis on the similarities, differences, functions and motivations of stance marker
use and identity construction. It is found that both sides show similarity in the use of boosters, emotional markers, and the
communicator identity construction. However, positive review responders use nicknames and evaluative markers more frequently and
highlight the inviter identity, while negative review responders employ more first-person plural forms and hedges and emphasize
the service provider identity. The findings reveal that responders to positive and negative reviews demonstrate both commonalities
and distinct priorities in shaping positive hotel images and engaging with guests, offering insights for business practitioners to
optimize their pragmatic strategies in digital communication.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Research on business responses to online reviews
- 2.2Research on stance expression and identity construction
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data collection
- 3.2Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Use of stance markers in hotel responses to positive and negative reviews
- 4.1.1Overview of stance marker use in CRPR and CRNR
- 4.1.2Functions of stance markers in CRPR and CRNR
- 4.2Identities constructed by stance markers in hotel responses to positive and negative reviews
- 4.2.1Overview of identity construction in CRPR and CRNR
- 4.2.2Construction and Functions of identities in CRPR and CRNR
- 4.1Use of stance markers in hotel responses to positive and negative reviews
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (54)
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana and María Luisa Carrió-Pastor. 2019. “Self-representation
in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential
debates”. Journal of
Pragmatics 147: 86–99.
Benwell, Bethan and Elizabeth Stokoe. 2006. Discourse
and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity
and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach”. Discourse
Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614.
Cenni, Irene and Patrick Goethals. 2020. “Responding
to negative hotel reviews: A cross-linguistic perspective on online
rapport-management”. Discourse, Context &
Media 37: 100430.
. 2021. “Business
responses to positive reviews online: Face-work on TripAdvisor”. Journal of
Pragmatics 180: 38–50.
Cenni, Irene. 2023. “Responding
to compliments online: The case of Airbnb online
experiences”. Sintagma 35(8): 119–135.
Chen, Jing and Xin Zhao. 2023. “An
empirical study of Chinese university student advisors’ dynamic identity construction in the context of individual
consultation”. Pragmatics 33 (1): 23–48.
Chen, Xinren. 2018. Pragmatic
Identity: How to Do Things with Words of
Identity. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
. 2021. “Identity
metadiscourse: Metadiscursive representation of pragmatic identity awareness”. Linguistic
Studies 1: 6–17.
Dickinger, Astrid and Lidija Lalicic. 2017. Management
Responses on Third-Party Review Websites: A Focus on Emotions and Service
Recovery. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Elm, Melissa S. 2009. “How do various notions of
privacy influence decisions in qualitative Internet
research?” In Internet inquiry: Conversations about
Method, edited by Annette N. Markham and Nancy K. Baym, 85–98. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Feng, Wei and Wei Ren. 2019. “‘This
is the destiny, darling’: relational acts in Chinese management responses to online consumer
reviews”. Discourse, Context &
Media 28: 52–59.
Fuoli, Matteo and Carita Paradis. 2014. “A
model of trust-repair discourse”. Journal of
Pragmatics 74: 52–69.
Ho, Victor. 2017. “Giving
offense and making amends: How hotel management attempts to manage rapport with dissatisfied
customers”. Journal of
Pragmatics 109: 1–11.
. 2019. “Hotel
management’s attempts at repairing customers’ trust: The use of apology and denial”. Pragmatics
and
Society 10(4): 493–511.
. 2020. “Do
hotels enhance and challenge rapport with customers with the same degree of
commitment?” Journal of
Pragmatics 166: 70–83.
Hofstede, Geert, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov. 2010. Cultures
and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huang, Jinging and Wei Xiao. 2024. “Use
of interactional metadiscourse and identity construction in responses to negative online reviews of Chinese and British
hotels”. PLOS
ONE 19(12): e0316071.
Hyland, Ken. 1999. “Disciplinary
discourses: Writer stance in research articles”. In Writing: Texts,
Processes and Practices, edited by Christopher N. Candlin and Ken Hyland, 99–121. London: Longman.
. 2005. “Stance
and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse”. Discourse
Studies 7(2): 173–192.
Hyland, Ken and Hang Zou. 2021. “‘I
believe the findings are fascinating’: stance in three-minute theses”. Journal of English for
Academic Purposes 50: 100973.
Jiang, Hui. 2020. “A
metapragmatic analysis of audience-oriented metadiscourse in TED talks”. Foreign Languages and
Their Teaching 4: 25–35.
Levy, Stuart E., Wenjing Duan and Soyoung Boo. 2013. “An
analysis of one-star online reviews and responses in the Washington, D. C., lodging
market”. Cornell Hospitality
Quarterly 54(1): 49–63.
Li, Chunyu, Yiheng Yu, Raffaele Filieri and Geng Cui. 2025. “All
words have consequences: Concrete versus abstract language in management response to hotel guest
reviews”. Tourism
Management 106: 105032.
Li, Jun. 2019. “A
Study of the Formation Mechanism of Chinese Gratitude Behavior”. Applied
Linguistics 4: 92–101.
Liu, Hao and Xinren Chen. 2021. “The
identity work of Chinese charities in their online donation-oriented crowdfunding
appeals”. Discourse, Context &
Media 42: 100514.
Liu, Ping and Yongping Ran. 2020. “Complaint
responses: Metapragmatic utterances and negotiation awareness”. Foreign Languages and Their
Teaching 4: 11–24.
Liu, Qian and Wei Cheng. 2025. “‘I’m
telling you’: The use of interactional metadiscourse in Chinese live streaming
commerce”. Journal of
Pragmatics 237: 14–29.
Liu, Yun, Ting Deng and Yan Chen. 2023. “A
study of stance markers and identity construction in academic discourse of English majors in
China”. Foreign Language
Research 5: 58–65.
Mauri, Aurelio G. and Roberta Minazzi. 2013. “Web
reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential
customers”. International Journal of Hospitality
Management 34: 99–107.
Morrow, Phillip R. and Kenta Yamanouchi. 2020. “Online
apologies to hotel guests in English and Japanese”. Discourse, Context &
Media 34: 100379.
O’Connor, Peter. 2010. “Managing
a hotel’s image on TripAdvisor”. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and
Management 19: 754–772.
Pantelidis, Ioannis S. 2010. “Electronic meal experience: A
content analysis of online restaurant comments”. Cornell Hospitality
Quarterly 51(4): 483–491.
Rahimivand, Mahsa and Davood Kuhi. 2014. “An
exploration of discoursal construction of identity in academic writing”. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences 98: 1492–1501.
Shi, Xingsong and Yilin Niu. 2022. “A
comparative study on the stance construction of Chinese and American corporate social responsibility
discourse”. Modern Foreign
Languages (1): 40–52.
Sparks, Beverley A., Kevin Kam Fung So and Graham L. Bradley. 2016. “Responding
to negative online reviews: The effects of hotel responses on customer inferences of trust and
concern”. Tourism
Management 53: 74–85.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Culturally
Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness
Theory. London: Continuum.
Stryker, Sheldon. 1987. “Identity
theory: Developments and extensions”. In Self and Identity:
Psychosocial Perspectives, edited by Krysia Yardley and Terry Honess, 89–103. Chichester: Wiley.
Suau Jiménez, Francisca. 2020. “Closeness
and distance through the agentive authorial voice: construing credibility in promotional
discourse”. International Journal of English
Studies 20(1): 73–92.
Sugiura, Lisa, Rosemary Wiles and Catherine Pope. 2017. “Ethical
challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions”. Research
Ethics 13(3–4): 184–199.
Valentinsson, Mary-Caitlyn. 2018. “Stance
and the construction of authentic celebrity persona”. Language in
Society 47(5): 715–740.
Van Herck, Rebecca Elektra and Lieve Vangehuchten. 2024. “Unpacking
the art of customer complaint handling in Spanish and British telecom emails: A cross-cultural webcare study with a human
touch”. International Journal of Business
Communication 61(1): 115–147.
Verschueren, Jef. 2000. “Notes
on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language
Use”. Pragmatics 10(4): 439–456.
Wang, Keyuan and Yansheng Mao. 2024. “A
discursive study of parents’ identity construction in Chinese wedding ceremony”. Discourse
&
Society 35(2): 264–279.
Xia, Jie. 2020. “‘Loving
you’: Use of metadiscourse for relational acts in WeChat public account
advertisements”. Discourse, Context &
Media 37: 100416.
Xie, Karen L., Zili Zhang and Ziqiong Zhang. 2014. “The
business value of online consumer reviews and management response to hotel
performance”. International Journal of Hospitality
Management 43: 1–12.
Yang, Na. 2025. “Opinion
sharing in online travel communities: A corpus-based comparison of members’ stance expression in Ctrip and
Tripadvisor”. Discourse, Context &
Media 65: 100885.