Article published In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles
Metonymy, metaphor, and multimodal civic meaning-making in children’s tax-themed postcards
Published online: 4 August 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.25185.yua
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.25185.yua
Abstract
This article investigates how Japanese elementary school students construct civic meaning through multimodal metaphor and metonymy in tax-themed postcards submitted to a public contest. Drawing on Relevance Theory, Cognitive Linguistics, and Multimodal Discourse Analysis, the study analyzes six configuration-based focal cases selected from a larger corpus of postcards produced for a regional civic-education contest. These visual-verbal compositions are examined for how they optimize relevance, balancing strong explicatures (e.g., institutional icons, labeled slogans) with weak implicatures (e.g., symbolic figures, layout cues) to convey abstract fiscal concepts. Through metonymy, metaphor, and metonymy–metaphor interplay, children not only reference but recontextualize civic messages, expressing evaluative stances on public contribution, mutual benefit, and social care. The analysis identifies recurrent patterns in how metonymy, metaphor, and their interplay are distributed across verbal and visual modes. Verbal metonymy tends to be visually grounded while verbal metaphor is rarely left unsupported, suggesting a pragmatic sensitivity to communicative coherence. The study advances multimodal pragmatics by foregrounding children’s intuitive rhetorical design and offers insights into how young learners recontextualize institutionally framed civic discourse through multimodal meaning-making.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical perspective: Relevance in multimodal meaning
- Data, research ethics, and methodology
- Results
- Metonymy in children’s multimodal artworks
- Metaphor in children’s multimodal artworks
- Metonymy-metaphor interplay in children’s multimodal artworks
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (37)
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2003). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
(2010). Metonymy in conceptualization, communication, language, and truth. In A. Burkhardt & B. Nerlich (Eds.), Tropical truth(s) (pp. 271–296). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Binder, M. J., & Kind, S. (Eds.). (2017). Drawing as language: Celebrating the work of Bob Steele. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Introduction. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 3–17). Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–44). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2020). Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Kashanizadeh, Z., & Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy: A study of Iranian and Dutch print advertisements. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 78–110.
Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., Bolognesi, M., Julich-Warpakowski, N., Leung, D., & Pérez Sobrino, P. (2023). Metaphor, metonymy, the body and the environment: An exploration of the factors that shape emotion-colour associations and their variation across cultures. Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R. (2009). Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gestures. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–358). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Littlemore, J., & Houghton, D. (2019). The role of figurative complexity in the comprehension and appreciation of advertisements. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 957–991.
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1–2), 113–136.
Pilkington, A. (2000). Poetic effects: A relevance theory perspective. John Benjamins.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Rocci, A., Mazzali-Lurati, S., & Pollaroli, C. (2018). The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica, 2201, 123–153.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F., & Díez Velasco, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Manen, M. (2002). The tone of teaching: The language of pedagogy (2nd rev. ed.). London, Ontario: Althouse Press.
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wood, E., & Hall, E. (2011). Drawings as spaces for intellectual play. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(3–4), 267–281.
Yuan, X. (2023). Metaphors and metonymies in the multimodal discourse of whaling: A cross-genre comparative study. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(2), 293–315.
(2025a). ‘Tiny canvases, big tales’: Deciphering the concept of tax through Japanese children’s postcard drawings. Visual Communication. Advance online publication.
(2025b). Various ways of supporting society: Decoding the tax is support metaphor in Japanese children’s multimodal expressions. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 322–345.