Article In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles
A semantic trajectory of the word soznaniye ‘consciousness’ in Russian and its methodological implications
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The concept of an “invisible hand” driving lexical-semantic change is deeply entrenched in contemporary cognitive linguistics and sociolinguistics. That said, numerous instances of sociocultural significance reveal identifiable visible factors that influence these changes. This article examines the semantic evolution of the word soznaniye ‘consciousness’ from the early nineteenth century to the early twenty-first century in Russian. The study utilizes the Russian National Corpus and the complete works of Vissarion Belinsky, a prominent Russian literary critic from the mid-nineteenth century, as primary data sources. The findings indicate that in early nineteenth-century Russian, the term soznaniye primarily conveyed two meanings — ‘awareness’ and ‘confession’ — while in contemporary Russian, it encompasses a variety of conceptual metaphors, with the container metaphor being the most prominent. The article argues that Vissarion Belinsky played a crucial role in this transformation, as his innovations significantly altered the perspective and were subsequently integrated into general language use. An important factor driving this shift was the sociocultural demand for secular alternatives to the concepts of dusha ‘soul’ and serdtse ‘heart’.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A semantic trajectory of the word soznaniye from the eighteenth to the nineteenth centuries
- 2.1The semantic structure of this word soznaniye in general Russian from 1800 to 1833
- 2.2The semantic structure of the word soznaniye in the texts of Vissarion Belinsky
- 3.A semantic structure of the word soznaniye in modern Russian
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (15)
Belinsky, Vissarion. (1953–1959). Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy [The complete works]. Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
Beyazid, Kamar, & Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit. (this issue). The black hole fed on the star: Conceptualizing black holes through metaphor in popular science Youtube communication.
Geeraerts, Dirk. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics: a contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford University Press.
Geeraerts, Dirk, Grondelaers, Stefan, & Bakema, Peter. (1994). The structure of lexical variation: meaning, naming, and context. M. de Gruyter.
Glebkin, Vladimir. (2024a). Cognitive semantics: A cultural-historical perspective. John Benjamins.
. (2024b). Kontseptual’nyye metafory ponyatiya « soznaniye » [Conceptual metaphors of the concept of soznaniye]. Voprosy psikhologii, 4, 45–52.
Harder, Peter. (2010). Meaning in mind and society. A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. De Gruyter Mouton.
Hegel, Georg W. F. (1974). Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Bd. 3. Phämenologie des Geistes [Works in twenty volumes. Vol. 3. Phenomenology of Spirit]. Suhrkamp Verlag. (First published 1807)
Langacker, Ronald. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford University Press.
Savchuk, Svetlana, Arkhangel’skiy, Timofey, Bonch-Osmolovskaya, Anastasya, Donina, Ol’ga, Kuznetsova, Yuliya, Lyashevskaya, Ol’ga, Orekhov, Boris, & Podryadchikova, Marya. (2024). Natsional’nyy korpus russkogo yazyka 2.0: novyye vozmozhnosti i perspektivy razvitiya [The Russian National Corpus 2.0: New Possibilities and Development Prospects]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2, 7–34.