Cover not available

Article In: Review of Cognitive Linguistics: Online-First Articles

Multi-perspective olfactory verbs in English, German, French, and Spanish

A corpus-based comparison of smell, riechen, sentir, and oler

ORCiD logo with link | Ludovika University of Public Service (NKE) | Eötvös Loránd University (ELTE)
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper reports on a corpus-based quantitative study of the central olfactory verbs of four European languages: English (smell), German (riechen), French (sentir), and Spanish (oler). The manual annotation of 400 random occurrences of each verb in the TenTen corpora encompassed four aspects of analysis: the three ways of conceptualizing perceptual events (e.g., the wine smells wonderful; I smell smoke; she knelt down to smell the daffodil); axiology (positive, neutral, negative); metaphoricity; and constructions (subjects and complements). Among other intriguing patterns, the examination has shed light upon considerable differences between the frequency of the metaphorical uses of the four verbs, with Spanish oler showing the highest proportion (above 40%). Further, the data on French sentir have revealed a close connection between the ça-construction and metaphoricity: two thirds of the verb’s metaphorical uses are formulated with ça (e.g., ça sent l’arnaque ‘this smells of a scam’).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Olfactory metaphors from a quantitative perspective
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overview
    • 4.2Phenomenon-based uses
    • 4.3Experiencer-based uses
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., & Storch, Anne. (2013). Linguistic expression of perception and cognition: A typological glimpse. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Anne Storch (Eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture (pp. 1–45). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Wendy. (2019). Perception metaphor in English: A bird’s-eye view. In Speed, Laura J., Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 65–83). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boisson, Claude. (1997). La dénomination des odeurs: Variations et régularités linguistiques. Intellectica, 24, 29–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Digonnet, Rémi. (2016). Métaphore et olfaction: Une approche cognitive. Honoré Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egorova, Alisa. (2026). All bark or all bite? The role of cultural knowledge in the semantics of the Russian verb sobatchitsya versus the English to dog. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata, & Jansegers, Marlies. (2013). On the crosslinguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics, 51(5), 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fausey, Caitlin M., & Boroditsky, Lera. (2011). Who dunnit? Cross-linguistic differences in eye-witness memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 150–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Jaén, Jorge. (2006). Análisis cognitivo del verbo oler. In M. Villayandre Llamazares (Ed.), Actas del XXXV Simposio de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (pp. 542–561). Universidad de León.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Modalidad epistémica y sentido del olfato: La evidencialidad del verbo oler. ELUA, 22, 65–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Semántica cognitiva diacrónica de los verbos de percepción física del español [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Alicante]. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante. URL: [URL]
. (2015). Diachronic evidentiality: From the sense of smell to the expression of knowledge. eHumanista/IVITRA, 8, 402–420.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2016). El olfato como fuente de conocimiento: origen histórico de los usos evidenciales del verbo oler. Onomázein, 33, 16–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2026). The grammatical properties of perception verbs: A reflection based on some recurring oppositions. Languages, 11(4), 71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franckel, Jean-Jacques. (2004). Sentir / sens. Lynx, 50, 103–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galac, Ádám. (2020). Semantic change of basic perception verbs in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and Hungarian. Argumentum, 16, 125–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2021). Basic-level multimodal perception verbs in French, Spanish, and Hungarian: a contrastive corpus study of Fr. sentir, Sp. sentir, and H. érez. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány, 21(2), 62–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2025). The linguistic conceptualization of olfactory perception in English, German, French, Spanish, and Hungarian [Doctoral dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University]. ELTE Digital Institutional Repository.
Gisborne, Nikolas. (2010). The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glebkin, Vladimir. (2026). A semantic trajectory of the word soznaniye ‘consciousness’ in Russian and its methodological implications. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hertegonne, Ellen. (2014). Étude diachronique des propriétés sémantico-syntaxiques du verbe de perception sentire/sentir du latin jusqu’au français contemporain [Master’s thesis, Universiteit Gent]. Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent. URL: [URL]
Huang, Shuping. (2026). “This” or “that”? The discursive-affective functions of Mandarin demonstratives in spoken and written corpora. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. (1996). Semantic extensions in the sense of smell. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca ‘Julio de Urquijo’, 30(2), 631–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). Smelling and perception: A cross-linguistic study. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa, 6(2), 113–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999a). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross-linguistic study [Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh]. Edinburgh Research Archive. URL: [URL]
. (1999b). Metaphorical mappings in the sense of smell. In Gibbs Raymond W., Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 29–45). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013). The power of the senses and the role of culture in metaphor and language. In Rosario Caballero & Javier E. Díaz Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition. Explorations into human sentience: Imagination, (e)motion and perception (pp. 109–133). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019). Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics. Scope, motivation, and lexicalisation. In Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque, & Asifa Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 43–64). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2021). The domain of olfaction in Basque. In Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Przemysław Staniewski (Eds.), The linguistics of olfaction (pp. 73–111). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jędrzejowski, Łukasz, & Staniewski, Przemysław. (2021). Rendering what the nose perceives. An introduction. In Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Przemysław Staniewski (Eds.), The linguistics of olfaction (pp. 1–34). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. (2019). Perception and metaphor. The case of smell. In Speed, Laura J., Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque & Asifa Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 327–346). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krejcie, Robert V., & Morgan, Daryle W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, Ana, & Valenzuela, Javier. (2005). Verbs of sensory perception: An English–Spanish comparison. Languages in Contrast, 5(2), 219–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouby, Catherine, & Bensafi, Moustafa. (2002). Is there a hedonic dimension to odors? In Catherine Rouby, Benoist Schaal, Danièle Dubois, Rémi Gervais & André Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 140–159). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation and language. In Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Tom Ziemke & Enrique Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind. Volume 2: Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 109–136). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staniewski, Przemysław. (2018). Olfaktorischer Wortschatz und dessen invektives Potenzial — Eine exemplarische Korpusanalyse. In Klinker, Fabian, Joachim Scharloth & Joanna Szczęk (Eds.), Sprachliche Gewalt: Formen und Effekte von Pejorisierung, verbaler Aggression und Hassrede (pp. 135–153). J. B. Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theissen, Anne. (2011). Sentir: Les constructions prédicatives de l’olfaction. Langages, 181, 109–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsering, Dolma, & Wallenböck, Ute. (2026). Hybridity and linguistic adaptability of Tibetan Buddhism in Taiwan. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2) [this issue].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Verbs of perception. In Haspelmath, Martin (Ed.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 1294–1309). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue