Cover not available

In:The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar
Edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 241] 2027
► pp. 20–67

The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar

 | University of Vienna
 | University of Amsterdam
 | University of Amsterdam
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of the organization of the Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG). The Interpersonal Level in FDG captures the actional aspects of utterances to the extent that these are formally encoded, including, among many other aspects, rhetorical relations, illocutionary force, speaker attitude, and definiteness and specificity. The chapter pays special attention to the changes proposed as regards the architecture of the Interpersonal Level since its first full presentation in Hengeveld & Mackenzie (2008)
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The layered structure of the Interpersonal Level
  • 3.The Discourse Segment
    • 3.1General characterization
    • 3.2The head
  • 4.The Move
    • 4.1General characterization
    • 4.2The head
    • 4.3Modifiers
    • 4.4Operators
  • 5.The Discourse Act
    • 5.1General characterization
    • 5.2The head
    • 5.3Modifiers
    • 5.4Operators
  • 6.The Illocution
    • 6.1General characterization
    • 6.2Heads
    • 6.3Modifiers
    • 6.4Operators
  • 7.The Speech Participants
    • 7.1General characterization
    • 7.2The head
    • 7.3Modifiers
    • 7.4Operators
  • 8.The Communicated Content
    • 8.1General characterization
    • 8.2The head
      • 8.2.1Introduction
      • 8.2.2Pragmatic functions
        • 8.2.2.1Focus
        • 8.2.2.2Topic
        • 8.2.2.3Contrast
        • 8.2.2.4Background
      • 8.2.3Types of sentences
        • 8.2.3.1Introduction
        • 8.2.3.2Categorical sentences
        • 8.2.3.3Thetic sentences
        • 8.2.3.4Presentative sentences
    • 8.3Modifiers
    • 8.4Operators
  • 9.The Comment and the Subacts
    • 9.1The Comment
      • 9.1.1General characterization
      • 9.1.2The head
      • 9.1.3Modifiers
      • 9.1.4Operators
    • 9.2The Subacts
      • 9.2.1Introduction
      • 9.2.2Ascription
        • 9.2.2.1General characterization
        • 9.2.2.2The head
        • 9.2.2.3Modifiers
        • 9.2.2.4Operators
      • 9.2.3Reference
        • 9.2.3.1General characterization
        • 9.2.3.2The head
        • 9.2.3.3Modifiers
        • 9.2.3.4Operators
  • 10.The Interpersonal Property
    • 10.1General characterization
    • 10.2The head
    • 10.3Modifiers
    • 10.4Operators
  • 11.Conclusion
  • Author queries
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Boland, Annerieke. 2006. Aspect, Tense and Modality: Theory, Typology, Acquisition. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bross, Fabian. 2020. “Encoding Different Types of Topics and Foci in German Sign Language. A Cartographic Approach to Sign Language Syntax.” Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2008. “Interpersonal Meaning in the Noun Phrase.” In The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Jan Rijkhoff and Daniel García Velasco, 221–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause, 2nd, revised edition. Edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1988. A Grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelenhoven, Aone van. 2004. Leti, a language of Soutwest Maluku. Leiden: KITLV Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ersen-Rasch, Margarete I. 1980. Türkisch für Sie: Grammatik. Munich: Hueber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Hongmei & Hengeveld, Kees. 2022. “Sentence-Final Particles in Mandarin.” Studia Linguistica 76(3): 873–913. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faust, Norma. 1973. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma Shipibo-Conibo. Lima, Peru: Summer Institute of Linguistics and Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Favaro, Marco. This volume. “Reassessing modal particles and their role within Discourse Acts: An FDG perspective.” In The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld, ###–###. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Giomi, Riccardo. 2021. “The Place of Interpersonal Lexemes in Linguistic Theory, with Special Reference to Functional Discourse Grammar.” Corpus Pragmatics 5: 187–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giomi, Riccardo & Van Olmen, Daniel & van Oers, Denise. This volume. “Insults as a Sentence Type: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” In The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld, ###–###. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Groot, Casper de & Limburg, Machiel. 1986. Pronominal Elements: Diachrony, Typology, and Formalization in Functional Grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike. 1991. “Pragmatic Function Assignment and Word Order Variation in a Functional Grammar of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 16: 131–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. this volume. “The Focalizing Copula in Colombian Spanish.” In The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld, ###–###. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hengeveld, Kees & Fischer, Rafael. in prep. A Grammar of A’ingae.
Hengeveld, Kees & Iatridou, Sabine & Roelofsen, Floris. 2023. “Quexistentials and Focus.” Linguistic Inquiry 54(3), 571–624. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Keizer, Evelien. 2011. “Non-Straightforward Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(7): 1962–1976. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2025. “General Principles of Linearization in Functional Discourse Grammar.” In Linearization in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Elnora Ten Wolde, Riccardo Giomi and Kees Hengeveld, 43–84. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Keizer, Evelien & Giomi, Riccardo. in prep. The Oxford Reference Guide to Functional Discourse Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Fuhui & Huang, Shuanfan. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Case Marking in Saisiyat.” Oceanic Linguistics 45.1: 91–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 2001. “The Dimensions of Topic-Comment.” Linguistics 39: 641–681. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2014. “Context and Cognition in Functional Discourse Grammar: What, Where and Why?” Pragmatics 24(2): 399–423.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. this volume. “I hereby propose: a modified analysis of performatives in FDG.” In The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld, ###–###. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kılıçaslan, Yılmaz. 2004. “Syntax of Information Structure in Turkish.” Linguistics 42(4), 717–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kojadinović, Zlatan. 2022. “Variation in the Prosody of Illocutionary Adverbs.” Open Linguistics 8: 593–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin. Amsterdam: Gieben. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Lorna. 1990. A Grammar of Tauya. Berlin & New York NY: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2019a. “The syntax of an emotional expletive in English.” In Emotion in Discourse, edited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie and Laura Alba-Juez, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. “The Functional Discourse Grammar Approach to Syntax.” In Current Approaches to Syntax: A Comparative Handbook, edited by András Kertész, Edith Moravcsik and Csilla Rákosi, 291–316. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittendorfer, Matthias. 2025. A Functional Approach to the Prosody of Information Packaging. PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna.
Onea, Edgar. 2022. “Specificity and Questions of Specification.” In Determiners and Quantifiers, edited by Chiara Gianollo, Klaus von Heusinger, and Maria Napoli, 130–185. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, edited by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description Vol. I: Clause Structure, edited by Timothy Shopen, 155–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1987. “The Thetic/Categorial Distinction Revisited.” Linguistics 25: 511–580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamaiurá: Língua Tupi-Guarani do Alto Xingu. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serafim, Monielly. 2022. “A Functional Discourse Grammar Account of Proper Names in Portuguese.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 21(2): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smeets, Ineke. 2007. A Grammar of Mapuche. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smit, Niels. 2007. “Information Packaging in Functional Discourse Grammar.” ALFA: Revista de Linguística 51(2): 91–118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. FYI: Theory and typology of information packaging. PhD Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Ten Wolde, Elnora. this volume. “Clause Linking and Information Structure: A FDG Analysis of English Purpose and Result Adverbial Clauses.” In The Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar, edited by Monielly Serafim, Matthias Mittendorfer and Kees Hengeveld, ###–###. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Vries, Lourens de. 1985. “Topic and Focus in Wambon Discourse.” In Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, edited by A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper de Groot and J. Lachlan Mackenzie, 155–180. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue