Article In: Target: Online-First Articles
Gestural style of the interpreter impacts performance appraisal in public service settings
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Public service interpreting can involve high-stakes situations in which multimodal information is key.
Interpreters often mimic speakers’ gestures, which is paradoxically associated both with lack of professionalism and with
fostering social harmony. This study investigates whether an interpreter’s gestural style affects users’ perceptions of
professionalism, trustworthiness, and skill. Fifty-seven experiment participants watched two twelve-minute videos of a simulated
English–Turkish parent–teacher conference. In one video, the interpreter used extensive gestures; in the other, she kept her hands
still. The raters responded to a twelve-item questionnaire on professionalism, trustworthiness, fluency, experience, and
likability. Statistical inference reveals that interpreters who used spontaneous gestures and gesturally aligned with speakers
received significantly more positive ratings. These results suggest that visual input, such as an interpreter’s gestural style,
plays a crucial role in third-party experiences of interpreter performance.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interpreted communication viewed through a multimodal lens
- 2.1The multimodal turn in Interpreting Studies
- 2.2The gestural style of the interpreter
- 2.3Appraisal vs quality of interpreting performances
- 3.Research questions
- 4.Materials and methods
- 4.1Stimuli preparation
- 4.1.1Script design
- 4.1.2Video recording and editing
- 4.2Questionnaire and metrics
- 4.3Experimental protocols
- 4.1Stimuli preparation
- 5.Statistical analysis of questionnaire responses
- 5.1Data pre-processing
- 5.2Descriptive statistics
- 5.3Statistical analysis
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Bias towards/against gestures in interpreting
- 6.2Social correlates of gestural mimicry
- 6.3Limitations and future directions
- 7.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Author queries
References
References (70)
Alter, Adam L., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2009. “Uniting
the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation.” Personality and Social Psychology
Review 13 (3): 219–235.
Ardizzi, Martina, Mariateresa Sestito, Francesca Martini, Maria Alessandra Umiltà, Roberto Ravera, and Vittorio Gallese. 2014. “When
Age Matters: Differences in Facial Mimicry and Autonomic Responses to Peers’ Emotions in Teenagers and
Adults.” PLoS
ONE 9 (10): e110763.
Baraldi, Claudio, and Laura Gavioli. 2012. Coordinating
Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cavents, Dries, and July de Wilde. 2023. “Face-Work
in Video Remote Interpreting: A Multimodal
Micro-Analysis.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 155–175. New York: Routledge.
Cavents, Dries, July de Wilde, and Jelena Vranjes. 2025. “Towards
a Multimodal Approach for Analysing Interpreter’s Management of Rapport Challenge in Onsite and Video Remote
Interpreting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 2351: 220–237.
Chartrand, Tanya L., and Rick van Baaren. 2009. “Chapter
5. Human Mimicry.” In Advances in Experimental Social
Psychology 411: 219–274.
Chwalczuk, Monika. 2021. Co-Speech
Gestures in Public Service Interpreting: Contextual Analysis of Multimodal Corpora. PhD
thesis. Université Paris Cité.
. 2022. “Construction
of Shared Semantic Spaces through Gestures in Interpreter-Mediated Psychotherapy
Sessions.” International Visual Culture
Review 9 (2): 207–221.
. 2025. “Interpreters’
Gestural Profiles across Settings: A Corpus-based Analysis of Healthcare, Educational and Police
Interactions.” Parallèles 37 (1): 105–123.
Cienki, Alan. 2024. “Variable
Embodiment of Stance-Taking and Footing in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Frontiers in
Psychology 151: 1429232.
Corriero, Elena F. 2017. “Counterbalancing.” In The
SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by Mike Allen, 278–281. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Davitti, Elena, and Sergio Pasquandrea. 2017. “Embodied
Participation: What Multimodal Analysis Can Tell Us about Interpreter-Mediated Encounters in Pedagogical
Settings.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1071: 105–128.
Davitti, Elena. 2019. “Methodological
Explorations of Interpreter-Mediated Interaction: Novel Insights from Multimodal
Analysis.” Qualitative
Research 19 (1): 7–29.
De Boe, Esther, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets. 2023. Interactional
Dynamics in Remote Interpreting. New York: Routledge.
De Boe, Esther. 2023. “Synchronization
of Interaction in Healthcare Interpreting by Video Link and
Telephone.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 22–41. New York: Routledge.
De Stefani, Elisa, Ylenia Nicolini, Mauro Belluardo, and Pier Francesco Ferrari. 2019. “Congenital
Facial Palsy and Emotion Processing: The Case of Moebius Syndrome.” Genes, Brain and
Behavior 18 (1): e12548.
Ekman, Paul, and Wallace V. Friesen. 1969. “The
Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and
Coding.” Semiotica 1 (1): 49–98.
Enfield, N. J. 2005. “The
Body as a Cognitive Artifact in Kinship Representations.” Current
Anthropology 46 (1): 51–81.
Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta. 1997. “Degree
of Interpreter Responsibilty in the Interaction Process in Community
Interpreting.” In The Critical Link: Interpreters in the
Community, edited by Silvana E. Carr, Roda P. Roberts, Aideen Dufour, and Dini Steyn, 147–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Forster, Michael, Helmut Leder, and Ulrich Ansorge. 2013. “It
Felt Fluent, and I Liked It: Subjective Feeling of Fluency Rather than Objective Fluency Determines
Liking.” Emotion 13 (2): 280–289.
Galvão, Elena Zagar, and Isabel Galhano Rodrigues. 2010. “The
Importance of Listening with One’s Eyes: A Case Study of Multimodality in Simultaneous
Interpreting.” In New Insights into Audiovisual Translation and Media
Accessibility, edited by Jorge Díaz Cintas, Anna Matamala, and Josélia Neves, 239–253. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
García Becerra, Olalla, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, and Rafael Barranco-Droege, eds. 2013. Quality
in Interpreting: Widening the Scope. Volume
1. Granada: Editorial Comares.
García-Beyaert, Sofia. 2021. “Framing
the Societal Value of Community Interpreting.” QScience
Connect 31: art. 6.
Gerwing, Jennifer, and Shuangyu Li. 2019. “Body-Oriented
Gestures as a Practitioner’s Window into Interpreted Communication.” Social Science &
Medicine 2331: 171–180.
Gibbon, Dafydd. 2005. “Spoken
Language Lexicography: An Integrative Framework.” Forum
Translationswissenschaft 51: 247–289.
Holewik, Katarzyna. 2020. “Peer
Feedback and Reflective Practice in Public Service Interpreter Training.” Theory and Practice
of Second Language
Acquisition 6 (2): 133–159.
Holler, Judith, and Katie Wilkin. 2011. “Co-Speech
Gesture Mimicry in the Process of Collaborative Referring During Face-to-Face
Dialogue.” Journal of Nonverbal
Behavior 35 (2): 133–153.
Iriskhanova, Olga K., Alan Cienki, Maria V. Tomskaya, and Alina I. Nikolayeva. 2023. “Silent,
but Salient: Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting, Research Result.” Theoretical and Applied
Linguistics 9 (1): 99–114.
Iriskhanova, Olga K., and Alan Cienki. 2018. “The
Semiotics of Gestures in Cognitive Linguistics: Contributions and Challenges.” Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki [Issues of
cognitive
linguistics] 41: 25–36.
Kimbara, Irene. 2006. “On
Gestural
Mimicry.” Gesture 6 (1): 39–61.
Kita, Sotaro, Jacob Barker, and Jiahao Yang. Forthcoming. “Gestures
in Advertisement: Self-Oriented Study.”
Klammer, Martina, and Franz Pöchhacker. 2021. “Video
Remote Interpreting in Clinical Communication: A Multimodal Analysis.” Patient Education and
Counseling 104 (12): 2867–2876.
Krystallidou, Demi. 2014. “Gaze
and Body Orientation as an Apparatus for Patient Inclusion into/Exclusion from a Patient-Centred Framework of
Communication.” The Interpreter and Translator
Trainer 8 (3): 399–417.
Leonteva, Anna V., Alan Cienki, and Olga V. Agafonova. 2023. “Metaphoric
Gestures in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Russian Journal of
Linguistics 27 (4): 820–842.
Licoppe, Christian, and Clair-Antoine Veyrier. 2020. “The
Interpreter as a Sequential Coordinator in Courtroom Interaction ‘Chunking’ and the Management of Turn Shifts in Extended
Answers in Consecutively Interpreted Asylum Hearings with Remote
Participants.” Interpreting 22 (1): 56–86.
Licoppe, Christian. 2023. “Consecutive
Interpreting and Embodied Sequences: Showing Evidence at a Distance in a Video-Mediated Courtroom
Setting.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 135–154. New York: Routledge.
Martín de León, Celia, and Elena Zagar Galvão. 2025. “Making
Gestures inside and outside the Booth: A Comparative
Study.” Parallèles 37 (1): 8–28.
Mason, Ian. 2012. “Gaze,
Positioning and Identity in Interpreter-Mediated
Dialogues.” In Coordinating Participation in Dialogue
Interpreting, edited by Claudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli, 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McIntosh, Daniel N., Aimee Reichmann-Decker, Piotr Winkielman, and Julia L. Wilbarger. 2006. “When
the Social Mirror Breaks: Deficits in Automatic, but Not Voluntary, Mimicry of Emotional Facial Expressions in
Autism.” Developmental
Science 9 (3): 295–302.
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand
and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about
Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. “Challenges
of Multimodality: Language and the Body in Social Interaction.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics 20 (3): 336–366.
Movavi. Movavi Video Editor 2023. Version
23.4.1. 2023. Computer software. [URL]
Müller, Cornelia, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill, and Sedinha Tessendorf, eds. 2013. Body
— Language — Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human
Interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Muniak, Paweł, and Wojciech Kulesza. 2024. “The
Impact of Mimicry Behavior on Guilt.” Social Psychological
Bulletin 191: e12697.
Neufeld, Janina, Christina Ioannou, Sebastian Korb, Leonhard Schilbach, and Bhismadev Chakrabarti. 2016. “Spontaneous
Facial Mimicry Is Modulated by Joint Attention and Autistic Traits.” Autism
Research 9 (7): 781–789.
Oben, Bert, and Geert Brône. 2016. “Explaining
Interactive Alignment: A Multimodal and Multifactorial Account.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1041: 32–51.
Parrill, Fey, and Irene Kimbara. 2006. “Seeing
and Hearing Double: The Influence of Mimicry in Speech and Gesture on Observers.” Journal of
Nonverbal
Behavior 30 (4): 157–166.
Pasquandrea, Sergio. 2011. “Managing
Multiple Actions through Multimodality: Doctors’ Involvement in Interpreter-Mediated
Interactions.” Language in
Society 40 (4): 455–481.
. 2012. “Co-Constructing
Dyadic Sequences in Healthcare Interpreting: A Multimodal Account.” New Voices in Translation
Studies 8 (1): 132–157.
Peirce, Jonathan, Jeremy R. Gray, Sol Simpson, Michael MacAskill, Richard Höchenberger, Hiroyuki Sogo, Erik Kastman, and Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv. 2019. “PsychoPy2:
Experiments in Behavior Made Easy.” Behavior Research
Methods 51 (1): 195–203.
Pöchhacker, Franz. 2002. “Quality
Assessment in Conference and Community
Interpreting.” Meta 46 (2): 410–425.
Poyatos, Fernando. 1997. “The
Reality of Multichannel Verbal-Nonverbal Communication in Simultaneous and Consecutive
Interpretation.” In Nonverbal Communication and Translation: New
Perspectives and Challenges in Literature, Interpretation and the Media, edited
by Fernando Poyatos, 249–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Seleskovitch, Danica, and Marianne Lederer. 2014. Interpréter Pour Traduire [Interpreting for translating]. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Skaaden, Hanne. 2016. “Professionalization
and Trust in Public Sector Interpreting.” International Journal of Language, Translation and
Intercultural
Communication 51: 56–66.
Van Schaik, Johanna E., and Sabine Hunnius. 2018. “Modulating
Mimicry: Exploring the Roles of Inhibitory Control and Social Understanding in 5-Year-Olds’ Behavioral
Mimicry.” PLOS
ONE 13 (3): e0194102.
Van Swol, Lyn M., and Meghann L. Drury-Grogan. 2017. “The
Effects of Shared Opinions on Nonverbal Mimicry.” SAGE
Open 7 (2): 215824401770724.
Vranjes, Jelena. 2023. “Where
to Look? On the Role of Gaze in Regulating Turn-Taking in Video Remote
Interpreting.” In Interactional Dynamics in Remote
Interpreting, edited by Esther de Boe, Jelena Vranjes, and Heidi Salaets, 113–134. New York: Routledge.
Vranjes, Jelena, and Geert Brône. 2021. “Interpreters
as Laminated Speakers: Gaze and Gesture as Interpersonal Deixis in Consecutive Dialogue
Interpreting.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1811: 83–99.
Vranjes, Jelena, and Hanneke Bot. 2021. “Optimizing
Turn-Taking in Interpreter-Mediated Therapy: On the Importance of the Interpreter’s Speaking
Space.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting
Research 13 (1): 101–117.
Vranjes, Jelena, Geert Brône, and Kurt Feyaerts. 2018. “On
the Role of Gaze in the Organization of Turn-Taking and Sequence Organization in Interpreter-Mediated
Dialogue.” Language and
Dialogue 8 (3): 439–467.
Vranjes, Jelena, Hanneke Bot, Kurt Feyaerts, and Geert Brône. 2018. “Displaying
Recipiency in an Interpreter-Mediated Dialogue.” In Eye-Tracking in
Interaction: Studies on the Role of Eye Gaze in Dialogue, edited by Geert Brône and Bert Oben, 303–324. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2019. “Affiliation
in Interpreter-Mediated Therapeutic
Talk.” Interpreting 21 (2): 220–244.
. 2001. “Interpreting
in Crisis: The Interpreter’s Position in Therapeutic
Encounters.” In Triadic Exchanges: Studies in Dialogue
Interpreting, edited by Ian Mason, 71–85. Manchester: St Jerome.
. 2004. “Dialogue
Interpreting: A Monologising Practice in a Dialogically Organised
World.” Target 16 (1): 105–124.