Article In: Terminology: Online-First Articles
Shaping architectural nomenclatures through contrasting ideologies
The role of subjectivity in naming the periods of English medieval architecture
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article analyses a debate published in the journal The Builder in 1851, in which subject field experts discussed nomenclatures for English medieval architecture. The debate illustrates how the principles of multidimensionality and terminologisation are instantiated in term formation, and describes the role played by the subjective motivations of experts in this process. Among these motivations were the authors’ personal aspirations to be recognised within their scientific community, the economic interests of publishers, and the authors’ idiosyncratic positions against possible updates to traditional terms. On a methodological level, the article highlights the importance of studying term formation as an evolving process in a diachronic perspective, focusing not just on terms as final products, as traditionally done in terminology theory, but on the dynamics which shaped them. Among the factors involved in this process, this study places particular emphasis on human agency, which played a decisive role in shaping its outcomes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1The multidimensionality of concepts and the subjective nature of terms in discourse
- 2.2Terminologisation as a motivated, diachronic process
- 2.3The agency of experts in term formation
- 3.Study aims and methodology
- 4.Historical reconstruction of the debate
- 5.Analysis of the historical sources
- 5.1Undefined concepts and arbitrary terms: Sharpe’s views on the necessity for a new architectural nomenclature
- 5.2The publishers’ perspective: Evidence from multiple journals
- 5.3The value of tradition as a criterion for term selection
- 5.4The international character of terms and communication as ideological positions
- 5.5The “convenience of names”: Experts’ personal motivations and the advancement of knowledge
- 6.Discussion and conclusions
- Notes
- Author queries
Bibliography
References (72)
Historical sources
Links refer to the original source available online:
Cox, George G. 1851, July 12th. “The seven periods of church architecture” The Builder IX (440): 431–432. [URL]
De Caumont, Arcisse. 1825. Essai sur l’architecture religieuse du moyen-âge, particulièrement en Normandie. Caen: Chalopin fils. [URL]
1851a, July 12th. “The seven periods of church architecture” The Builder IX (440): 430–432. [URL]
1851b, August 16th. “The seven periods of church architecture” The Builder IX (445): 512–513. [URL]
Garbett, Edward L. 1851, October 4th. “Nomenclature of English styles” The Builder IX (452): 619–620. [URL]
The Ecclesiologist in Reply to Mr Freeman. 1846, June. The Ecclesiologist 2(8) No. XII: 217–249. [URL]
FSA. 1851a, June 21st. “The seven periods of church architecture” The Builder IX (437): 386–387. [URL]
. 1851b, July 19th. “The seven periods of English architecture” The Builder IX (441): 445–446. [URL]
. 1851c, July 26th. “The seven periods of English church architecture” The Builder IX (442): 464. [URL]
Garbett, Edward L. 1851 October 4th. “Nomenclature of English styles” The Builder IX (452): 619–620. [URL]
Godwin, George. 1851, October 18th. “Classification of medieval architecture” The Builder IX (454): 656. [URL]
Howard, Luke. 1803. “On the Modifications of Clouds; and the Principles of their Production, Suspension and Destruction; being the Substance of an Essay read before the Askesian Society in the Session 1802–03” The Philosophical Magazine XVI (62): 97–107. [URL]
Millers, George. 1807. A Description of the Cathedral Church of Ely; with some account of the conventual buildings. Illustrated by engravings. London: John White.
Monro, Henry. 1855. “On the Nomenclature of the various forms of Insanity” The Asylum 2(1): 286–305. [URL]
Parker, John H. 1836. A Glossary of Terms used in Grecian, Roman, Italian and Gothic Architecture. London: John Henry Parker.
1851, October 18th. “Classification of medieval architecture” The Builder IX (454): 654–656. [URL]
Rickman, Thomas. 1817. An Attempt to discriminate the Styles of English Architecture, from the Conquest to the Reformation; with notices of Eight Hundred English Buildings: Preceded by A Sketch of the Grecian and Roman. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.
Scott, George G. 1851a, August 2nd. “The seven periods of English architecture” The Builder IX (443): 480–481. [URL]
1851b, September 20th. “The classification of medieval architecture” The Builder IX (449): 590. [URL]
Sharpe, Edmund. 1851a. The Seven Periods of English Architecture. Defined and Illustrated. London: George Bell.
. 1851b, June 7th. “The seven periods of church architecture” The Builder IX (435): 356–358. [URL]
. 1851c, July 5th. “The seven periods of English architecture” The Builder IX (439): 417–419. [URL]
. 1851d, September 06th. “The classification of medieval architecture” The Builder IX (448): 557–558. [URL]
. 1851e, November 08th. “The classification of medieval architecture” The Builder IX (457): 702–703. [URL]
Whewell, William. 1830. Architectural Notes on German Churches; with remarks to the Origin of Gothic Architecture. Cambridge: John Smith, Printer to the University for J. and J.J. Deighton Cambridge.
Willis, Robert. 1844. Architectural Nomenclature of the Middle Ages. With three plates. Published by J & J.J. Deighton and T. Stevenson, John W. Parker, London & John H. Parker, Oxford. Cambridge printed at the Cambridge University Press. No. IX of the Publications of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society.
Secondary sources
Bazerman, Charles. 2003. “Intertextuality: How Texts rely on other Texts”. In: What Writing Does and How It Does It. An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices. Bazerman, Charles and Paul Prior (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge: 83–96.
Belsey, Catherine. 2013. “Textual Analysis as a Research Method.” In Research Methods for English Studies, ed. by Gabriele Griffin, 160–178. Edinburgh: University Press.
Bowker, Lynne. 1993. “Multidimensional Classification of Concepts for Terminological Purposes”. 4th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, 39–56.
. 1997. “Multidimensional Classification”. In: Handbook of Terminology Management. Volume 1. Basic aspects of Terminology Management. Wright, Sue Ellen and Gerhard Budin (Eds.).: 133–142.
. 1998. “Variant terminology: frivolity or necessity?” Proceedings of the 8th EURALEX International Congress. August 4–8, 1998. Liège, Belgium. Thierry Fontenelle, Philippe Hiligsmann, Archibald Michiels, André Moulin, Siegfried Theissen (Eds.): 487–496.
. 2022. “Multidimensionality.” In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, ed. by Pamela Faber, and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Drouin, Patrick, Aline Francœur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton (Eds.). 2017. Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dury, Pascaline and Aurélie Picton. 2009. “Terminologie et diachronie : vers une réconciliation théorique et méthodologique ?” Revue française de linguistique appliquée 2 (XIV): 31–41.
Dury, Pascaline. 2022. “Diachronic variation.” In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, ed. by Pamela Faber, and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 421–455. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Faber, Pamela. 2009. “The Cognitive Shift in Terminology and Specialized Translation”. MonTI — Monografias de Traduccion e Interpretacion 1: 107–134.
Fernández-Silva, Sabela, Judit Freixa and M. Teresa Cabré. 2009. “Multiple motivations in the denomination of concepts: the case of “production area” in the terminology of aquaculture in French and Galician”. Terminology Science and Research 20: 21–38.
Fernández-Silva, Sabela, Judit Freixa, and Maria Teresa Cabré. 2011. “A Proposed Method for Analysing the Dynamics of Cognition through Term Variation”. Terminology 17 (1): 49–74.
Freixa, Judith. 2006. “Causes of denominative variation in terminology. A typology proposal”. Terminology 12 (1): 51–77.
. 2022. “Causes of terminological variation”. In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, ed. by Pamela Faber, and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 399–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gimenez, Julio C. 2010. “Narrative Analysis in Linguistic Research.” In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. by Lia Litosseliti, 198–215. London: Continuum.
Hughes, John M. 2010. Edmund Sharpe: man of Lancaster, architect, engineer and entrepreneur: an historical record. Manchester: T. Walker & Company.
. 2018. “Term formation and neology.” In Languages for special purposes. An international handbook, ed. by John Humbley, Gerhard Budin and Christer Laurén, 437–452. Berlin: De Gruyter.
International Organization for Standardization. 2022. Terminology work. Principles and Methods. (ISO Standard No. 704: 2022). [URL]
Kageura, Kyo. 2002. The Dynamics of Terminology. A descriptive theory of term formation and terminological growth. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lundy, Karen S. 2008. “Historical Research.” In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, ed. by Lisa M. Given, 395–399. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Meyer, Ingrid and Kristen MacKintosh. 2000. “When terms move into our everyday lives: An overview of de-terminologization”. Terminology 6(1): 111–138.
Myking, Johan. 2009. “Yet another taxonomy of motivations.” Terminology Science and Research 20: 39–53.
Pecman, Mojca. 2012. “Tentativeness in term formation. A study of neology as a rhetorical device in scientific papers.” Terminology 18 (1): 27–58.
. 2014. “Variation as a cognitive device. How scientists construct knowledge through term formation.” Terminology 20 (1): 1–24.
Peruzzo, Katia and Paola Catenaccio. (Eds.). 2024. “Terminology, Ideology and Discourse”, Special Issue of Terminology 30(1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Picht, Heribert and Jennifer Daskau. 1985. Terminology; An Introduction. Guildford: University of Surrey, Department of Linguistic and International Studies.
Picton, Aurélie. 2009a. “Diachronie en langue de spécialité, définition d’une méthode linguistique outillée pour repérer l’évolution des connaissances en corpus : un exemple appliqué au domaine spatial.” PhD diss., Université de Toulouse Le Mirail.
. 2009b. “Marqueurs et contextes riches en connaissances pour observer l’évolution en diachronie courte : Éléments méthodologiques en corpus (Markers and Knowledge-Rich Contexts to Study Short-Term Evolution in Corpora : Elements for a Methodological Framework in French)”. Heine, Carmen and Engberg, Jan (eds.): Reconceptualizing LSP. Online proceedings of the XVII European LSP Symposium 2009. Aarhus 2010.
. 2011. “Picturing Short-Term Diachronic Phenomena in Specialised Corpora. A Textual Terminology Description of the Dynamics of Knowledge in Space Technologies”. In: Terminology 17 (1): 134–156.
. 2014. “The dynamics of terminology in short-term diachrony. A proposal for a corpus-based methodology to observe knowledge evolution”. In: Dynamics and Terminology: An interdisciplinary perspective on monolingual and multilingual culture-bound communication. Temmerman, Rita and Marc Van Campenhoudt (Eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 159–182.
Picton, Aurélie and Pascaline Dury. 2017. “Diastratic variation in language for specific purposes. Observations from the analysis of two corpora.” In Multiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation, ed. by Drouin, Patrick, Aline Francœur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton, 57–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Picton, Aurélie and Anne Condamines. 2024. “Diachronie courte et pluridisciplinarité. Observer l’émergence d’une nouvelle discipline : l’exobiologie”. Lexique 35 (2024): 85–106.
Ragazzini, Beatrice. 2025. “Exploring terminological processes in the 19th century”. In: Terminology throughout History: A discipline in the making, ed. by Warburton, Kara and John Humbley, 83–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rogers, Margaret. 2004. “Multidimensionality in Concept Systems: A Bilingual Textual Perspective”. Terminology 10 (2): 215–240.
Sager, Juan C. 1990. A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sager, Juan. C. 1997. “Term Formation”. In Handbook of Terminology Management: Basic Aspects of Terminology Management, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright and Gerhard Budin, 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sunderland, Jane. 2010. “Research questions in Linguistics”. In Research Methods in Linguistics, ed. by Lia Litosseliti, 198–215. London: Continuum.
Temmerman, Rita. 2000. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2022. “Units of Understanding in Sociocognitive Terminology studies”. In Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, ed. by Pamela Faber, and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 331–352. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Warburton, Kara and John Humbley (Eds.). 2025. Terminology throughout History. A discipline in the making. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.