In:Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition: In honour of Heike Behrens
Edited by Karin Madlener-Charpentier, Marjolijn H. Verspoor, Mirjam Weder and Annelies Häcki Buhofer
[Trends in Language Acquisition Research 35] 2026
► pp. 69–110
Get fulltext
Chapter 3What’s in a word?
Cognitive-linguistic, corpus-linguistic, neuroscientific, AI, psycholinguistic, and usage-based perspectives
Authors
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].
Published online: 21 May 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.35.03ell
https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.35.03ell
Abstract
How do words mean? Scholars have historically taken different views. Shakespeare (1597) and de Saussure (1916) emphasized
signification; Firth (1957) “you shall know a word by the company it keeps”; and Wittgenstein (1953) “in most cases meaning is use”. These maxims have
influenced major contemporary research areas — signification imbues structuralism, semiotics,
cognitive linguistics, psycholinguistics, embodied (4E) cognition, and neuroscience; lexical company inspires corpus linguistics, computer
science, and artificial intelligence (AI); and usage-based
approaches relate everyday social use to language acquisition and pedagogy. This chapter
examines the historical and logical lineages of these ideas. Language is a complex adaptive system involving many
types of agents — words and meanings, speeches and texts, speakers and social groups, cultures and customs. In
language learning, signification, lexical company, and social usage are separable but symbiotic sources to meaning. In
words, these sources of information are fused together. And who has done the fusing? You. You contain multitudes. You
are a strange loop, an agentive self-referential hierarchical conscious system, who has hosted and dynamically merged
these three complementary streams of information over the course of your lifetime, from before your first word,
probably some version of mother, to now. This chapter reviews how.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Signification
- 2.1Shakespeare
- 2.2Saussure
- 2.2.1 Syntagmatic relations
- 2.2.2 Associative relations
- 2.3Associationism
- 2.3.1James
- 2.3.2Paivio: Imageability and concreteness effects
- 2.4Cognitive psychology
- 2.5
Symbol grounding
- 2.5.1The Chinese room argument
- 2.5.2The symbol grounding problem
- 2.5.3Perceptual symbol systems
- 2.6Psycholinguistics: Frequency and imageability
- 2.7Embodied cognition
- 2.8Cognitive Linguistics
- 2.9Neuroscience and concomitant dependency
- 2.10Signification in sum
- 3.Lexical company
- 3.1Corpus linguistics
- 3.2Phraseology
- 3.3Using corpora to investigate words and phrases
- 3.3.1Hand
- 3.3.2Back
- 3.3.3Ass
- 3.4Construction Grammar
- 3.5Connectionism and triangulation
- 3.6Associations and absences
- 3.7Lexical company, AI, and LLMs
- 4.Social usage
- 4.1Meaning in social usage
- 4.2Language learning from social usage
- 5.In a WORD: The associative-cognitive CREED
- 6.Emergence
- 6.1Language as a Complex Adaptive System (LaCAS)
- 6.2The units of language
- 6.3The sources of word meaning
Notes References
References (177)
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge University Press.
Aziez, F., Bátyi, S., Pfenninger, S., & Verspoor, M. (2026). A longitudinal dynamic usage-based study on peer interaction at an Indonesian pesantren. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., & Cortese, M. J. (2006). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 285–375). Elsevier.
Bates, E., Dale, P., Fenson, L., Hartung, J., Marchman, V., Reilly, J., Reznick, J. S., & Thal, D. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 85–123.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(s1), 1–26.
Behrens, H. (2008). Corpora in language acquisition research: History, methods, perspectives. John Benjamins.
(2017). The role of analogy in language processing and acquisition. In M. Hundt, S. Moulin, & S. E. Pfenninger (Eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 215–239). Cambridge University Press.
Behrens, H., & Pfänder, S. (Eds.). (2016). Experience counts: Frequency effects in language. De Gruyter.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Facct’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, 610–623.
Berger, C., Crossley, S., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Using lexical features to investigate second language lexical decision performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 911–935.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
Biber, D., & Reppen, D. (Eds.). (2015). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Brown,
C. H. (2013).
Hand and
arm. In M. S. Dryer &
M. Haspelmath (Eds.),
WALS Online (v2020.3) [Data
set].
Zenodo. [URL]
Brysbaert, M., & Biemiller, A. (2017). Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings. Behavioral Research Methods, 49(4), 1520–1523.
Bybee, J. L. (2005). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Linguistic Society of America.
Cadierno, T., & Eskildsen, S. W. (Eds.). (2015). Usage-based perspectives on second language learning. De Gruyter Mouton.
Coltheart, M. (2001). Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. In B. Rapp (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind (pp. 3–21). Psychology Press.
Cortese, M. J., McCarty, D. P., & Schock, J. (2015). A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1489–1501.
Crossley, S. A., & Skalicky, S. (2019). Examining lexical development in second language learners: An approximate replication of Salsbury,
Crossley, & McNamara (2011). Language Teaching, 52(3), 385–405.
Davies, M. (2004). British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press). [URL]
(2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). [URL]
Doughty, C., & Long, M. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 50–80.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.
(1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126.
(2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and
explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
(2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language
structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33–68). Blackwell.
(2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.
(2006a). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The Associative Cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100–121.
(2006c). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience,
interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31.
(2007). Dynamic systems and SLA: The wood and the trees. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 10, 23–25.
(2011). The emergence of language as a complex adaptive system. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 666–679). Routledge.
(2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.
(2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity in P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). John Benjamins.
(2017). Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language
learning. Language Learning, 67, 40–65.
(2022). Second language learning of morphology. Journal of the European Second Language Association 6(1), 34–59.
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43(4), 559–617.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and
function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370–386.
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), whole issue.
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014). The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency,
contingency, and prototypicality. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 55–98.
(2015). Usage-based language learning. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 163–180). John Wiley and Sons.
Ellis, N. C., & Ogden, D. C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage-based approaches to acqusition and
processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604–620.
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Language usage, acquisition, and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction
grammar. Wiley-Blackwell.
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics,
and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2014). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75–93). Routledge.
(2015). Second language acquisition. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 409–431). De Gruyter Mouton.
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. The MIT Press.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2026). Second language learning as local and long-term process in and for social
interaction. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Fallon, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2024). Language at a glance: How our brains grasp linguistic structure from parallel visual
input. Science Advances, 10(43).
Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 120–126.
Feynman, R. P. (2010). “Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!”: Adventures of a curious character. WW Norton & Company.
Frackowiak, R. S. J., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., Price, C. J., Zeki, S., Ashburner, J., & Penny, W. (Eds.). (2004). Human brain function (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Frank, M. C., Braginsky, M., Yurovsky, D., & Marchman, V. A. (2016). Wordbank: An open repository for developmental vocabulary data. Journal of Child Language, 44(3), 677–694.
Freud, S. (1891 [1953]). On aphasia; A critical study (E. Stengel, Trans.). International Universities Press.
Frith, C. (2010). What is consciousness for? Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(3), 497–551.
Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2010). The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 365, 165–175.
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Blackwell.
Geeraerts, D. (1995). Cognitive Linguistics. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 111–116). John Benjamins.
Godfroid, A., & Hopp, H. (2022). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics. Taylor & Francis.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
(2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219–224.
(2008). Construction learning and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 207–225). Routledge.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289–316.
Gries, S. T. (2019). 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of
corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 385–412.
Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(S1, Special
Issue: Currents in Language Learning Series: Improving and Extending Quantitative Reasoning in Second Language
Research), 28–255.
Hoey, M. (2004). The textual priming of lexis. In G. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp. 21–41). John Benjamins.
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. Basic Books.
Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern Grammar: A corpus driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. John Benjamins.
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458.
Jackson, J. H. (1893). Words and other symbols in mentation. Medical Press and Circular, ii, 205. Reprinted In Brain, 1915, xxxviii.
Klatt, M., & Pfänder, S. (2026). Scaffolding: A contribution to the Interaction Acquisition Support System. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition research. Language Learning, 48, 527–550.
Köylü, Z. (2026). Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English: The case of sojourners. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford University Press.
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech-learning gated by the ‘social brain’? Developmental Science, 10, 110–120.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
(2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1–63). CSLI.
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
Lieven, E. V. M. (2014). First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41(S1), 48–63.
Lieven, E. V. M., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333–370.
Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children’s first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168–196). Routledge.
Littlemore, J. (2023). Applying cognitive linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Long, M. H. (1982). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339–354). Newbury House.
(1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). John Benjamins.
(1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisitiom (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
(2006). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–117). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Introduction to the Special Issue on Interaction Research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 169–178.
(2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk, Vol 2: The Database (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024). Dissociating language and thought in large language models. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(6), 517–540.
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Recognition times for 62 thousand English words: Data from the English Crowdsourcing
Project. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 741–760.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
McManus, K. (Ed.). (2024). Usage in second language acquisition: Critical reflections and future directions. Routledge.
(2009). WordNet — About us. [URL]
Parkinson, J., & Coxhead, A. (2023). Learning workplace language in a vocational educational setting. In M. Chan (Ed.), Perspectives on teaching workplace English in the 21st Century (pp. 208–229). Routledge.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–225). Longman.
Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical
stimulation. Brain, 60(4), 389–443.
Popham, S. F., Huth, A. G., Bilenko, N. Y., Deniz, F., Gao, J. S., Nunez-Elizalde, A. O., & Gallant, J. L. (2021). Visual and linguistic semantic representations are aligned at the border of human visual
cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 24(11), 1628–1636.
(2003). The neuroscience of language. On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition. Routledge.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Rowland, C. F., Jones, G., Peter, M. L., Bidgood, A., Jessop, A., Durrant, S., Stinson, P., & Pine, J. M. (2026). Explaining individual differences in children’s vocabulary growth: Insights from the Language 0–5
Project. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.
Shakespeare, W. (1597, 2000). Romeo and Juliet, Act 2, Scene 2, lines 36–54. Published for the Malone Society by Oxford University Press.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List (AFL). Applied Linguistics, 31, 487–512.
Sinclair, J. M. (1966). Beginning the study of lexis. In C. E. Bazell (Ed.), In Memory of J.R. Firth (pp. 410–430). Longmans.
Sinclair,
J. M. (2008).
The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the
phrase.
In S. Granger &
F. Meunier
(Eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary
perspective
(pp. 407–410).
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Pellicer-Sanchez, A. (2018). Understanding formulaic language: A second language acquisition perspective. Routledge.
Slobin, D. (2026). The wealth of the stimulus. In K. Madlener-Charpentier, M. Verspoor, M. Weder, & A. Häcki Buhofer (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on language and language acquisition. In honour of Heike Behrens. John Benjamins (this volume).
Slobin, D. I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 5, pp. 265–323). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language
learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371–391.
Tomasello, M. (Ed.). (1998). The mew psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1989). Feedback for language transfer errors: The garden path technique. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 385–395.
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge.
Varela, F.,
Thompson, E.,
& Rosch,
E. (1991). The
embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience MIT Press.
Wilson, R. A., & Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Aziez, Feisal, Szilvia Bátyi, Simone E. Pfenninger & Marjolijn Verspoor
2026. A longitudinal dynamic usage-based study on peer interaction at an Indonesian
pesantren
. In Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 35], ► pp. 272 ff.
Köylü, Zeynep
2026. Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English. In Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 35], ► pp. 248 ff.
Steinkrauss, Rasmus
2026. The ditransitive verb-argument construction in German L1 acquisition. In Usage-based Perspectives on Language and Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 35], ► pp. 168 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
