In:Diachronic and Typological Perspectives on Anticausativization
Edited by Guglielmo Inglese, Giulia Mazzola and Eugenio Goria
[Typological Studies in Language 138] 2026
► pp. 25–46
Chapter 2Causal-noncausal triads
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Causal-noncausal alternations are usually described as pairs, e.g. fear/afraid: frighten.
In fact, at least for verb sets with a state component in the semantics there are three forms, with two noncausals, typically
one unbounded and one bounded, usually ingressive: fear, be afraid/scared vs. get scared, take
fright. This chapter proposes that we recognize causal triads as the basic set for causal-noncausal alternations.
It offers terminology and a preliminary account of the semantics, derivation, and cross-linguistic distribution of the
distinction, as well as criteria for deciding which of the noncausals is base for the other. It also raises some research
questions and calls for inclusion of causal triad information in dictionaries.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Causal triads
- 3.The base of the paradigm
- 4.Some questions and problems
- 4.1Adjectives
- 4.2Extensions
- 4.3Some preliminary typological findings
- 5.Conclusions
- Author queries
Notes References Appendix
References (28)
Andersen, Henning. 1999. The
western South Slavic contrast Sn. sah-ni-ti // SC
sah-nu-ti. Slovenski jezik / Slovene Linguistic
Studies 2: 47–62.
Batalova, Raisa Mixajlovna and Antonina Semenovna Krivosčekova-Gantman. 1985. Komi-permjacko-russkij
slovar’. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
Beznosikova, L. M., N. K. Zaboeva, and R. I. Kosnyreva. 2003. Russko-komi
slovar’: bolee 52,000 slov. Syktyvkar: Komi knižnoe izdatel’stvo.
Boldyrev, B. V. and M. D. Simonov. 1994. Russko-èvenkijskij
slovar’: okolo 20,000
slov. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Boldyrev, B. V. 2000. Èvenkijsko-russkij
slovar’: okolo 21,000
slov. Novosibirsk: Izdatel’stvo RAN, filial Geo.
Dickey, Stephen M. 2024. Aspect in
verbs. The Cambridge handbook of Slavic linguistics, Danko Šipka & Wayles Browne (eds), 211–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grossman, Eitan & Dmitry Nikolaev. 2018. Toward
a distributional typology of basic valence orientation in Eurasia. Presented
at Societas Linguistica
Europaea, Tallinn.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More
on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In Causatives and
Transitivity, Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Janhunen, Juha. 2024. Tungusic
in time and space. The Tungusic
languages, ed. Alexander Vovin, José Andrés Alonso de la Fuents, and Juha Janhunen, 517–537. Milton Park: Routledge.
Kibrik, A. E. & S. V. Kodzasov. 1988. Sopostavitel’noe izuchenie dagestanskix jazykov: Glagol. [Comparative analysis of Daghestanian languages: The
verb.] Moscow: Moscow University.
Lytkin, V. I. 1961. Komi-russkij
slovar’. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo inostrannyx i nacional’nyx slovarej.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1969. Nekotorye
verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazovanii. [Some
probabilistic universals of verbal derivation.] In Jazykovye
universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, Ivan F. Vardul’ (ed), 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.
Nichols, Johanna. 2004. Ingush-English
and English-Ingush Dictionary / Ghalghaai-ingalsii, ingalsii-ghalghaai
lughat. London: Routledge/Curzon.
. 2019. Suppletion
or illusion? The diachrony of suppletive
derivation. In Perspectives on language structure and
language change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen, Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Lene Schøsler (eds), 345–356. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2022. Realization
of the causative alternation: Revised wordlist and examples. [URL]
. To
appear. Slavic
prehistory. In The Slavonic Languages, 2nd
ed, Victor A. Friedman & Lenore Grenoble (eds). London: Routledge.
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing
and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic
Typology 8(2): 149–211.
Onenko, Sulungu N. and V. A. Avrorin. 1980. Nanajsko-russkij
slovar’ / Nanaj-loča xèsènkuni: 12,800
slov. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.
Plank, Frans & Aditi Lahiri. 2015. Macroscopic
and microscopic typology: Basic Valence Orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked
eye. Linguistic
Typology 19(1): 1–54.
Rix, Helmut (ed). 2001. LIV,
Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre
Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Schönig, Claus. 2003. Turko-Mongolic
relations. In The Mongolic
Languages, Juha Janhunen (ed), 403–419. London: Routledge.
WATP. 2014. World Atlas of
Transitivity Pairs. Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. Accessed at [URL]
