In:Diachronic and Typological Perspectives on Anticausativization
Edited by Guglielmo Inglese, Giulia Mazzola and Eugenio Goria
[Typological Studies in Language 138] 2026
► pp. 333–373
Chapter 11Anticausativization and lability in Latin before 200 CE
The role of transitivity parameters in the syntax of anticausativization
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter discusses how a corpus-based approach can contribute to a better understanding of the
encoding variation in anticausativization and lability in Latin. Latin originally had three strategies to derive a noncausal
alternant from a causal predicate (two marked and one unmarked), namely the mediopassive, the reflexive, and the labile
strategies. First, I discuss how actionality played a role in the selection of lability over the marked anticausative
strategies. Secondly, I discuss the role of control in the selection of the three strategies, especially in the distinction
between the mediopassive and reflexive strategies.
Keywords: anticausativization, lability, Latin, mediopassive, reflexivity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Corpus and methodology
- 2.1Data extraction
- 2.2Transitivity parameters, coding decisions and hypotheses
- 2.3Random forest
- 2.3.1Three response variables
- 2.3.2Marked vs. unmarked strategies
- 2.3.3Reflexive vs. mediopassive
- 2.4Multinomial logistic regression
- 3.Anticausativization in Latin
- 3.1The mediopassive morphology and voice syncretism
- 3.2Reflexivization
- 3.3Lability
- 4.Aspectual constraints
- 4.1Stativity and dynamicity
- 4.2Telicity
- 4.3Interim summary: The aspectual factors in Latin anticausativization
- 5.Agentivity
- 5.1Marked decausatives
- 5.2Marked autocausatives
- 5.3Lability and agentivity
- 5.4Interim summary: Control and anticausativization
- 6.Conclusion
- Author queries
Acknowledgments Notes References Appendix
References (61)
Bertocci, Davide. 2017. Latin
1st class -ā- verbs as thematic formations: On the deficiency of IE
roots. Pallas (103). 45–52.
Breiman, Leo, Adele Cutler, Andy Liaw & Matthew Wiener. 2002. randomForest:
Breiman and Cutlers random forests for classification and regression [R package].
. 1998. The
loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and Early
Romance. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds), Historical
Linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17
August 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
164], 77–100. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2021. Anticausatives
and lability in Italian and French: a diachronic-synchronic comparative
study. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds), Valency
over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency
orientation, 265–304. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2022. Anticausativization
in Latin and Early Italo-Romance: The semantics of predicates and the syntax of
voice. In Domenica Romagno, Francesco Rovai, Michele Bianconi & Marta Capano (eds), Variation,
contact, and reconstruction in the ancient Indo-European
languages, 243–273. Leiden: Brill.
Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal. 2015. Semantic
and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old
Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53(4). 677–729.
Clackson, James. 2009. Indo-European
linguistics: an introduction [Cambridge Textbooks in
Linguistics]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Causative
verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed), Language
typology and syntactic
description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories
and the
lexicon, 309–348. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity [Cambridge
Studies in Linguistics 69]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les
verbes déponents latins: Des origines à
Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Green, John N. 1991. The collapse and
replacement of verbal inflection in Late Latin/Early Romance: How would one
know? In Roger Wright (ed), Latin
and the Romance languages in the Early Middle
Ages, 83–99. London: Routledge.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity
alternations of the anticausative
type. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, University of Cologne.
. 1990. The
grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in
Language 14(1). 25–72.
. 1993. More
on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Causatives
and transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series
23], 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2016. Universals
of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua
Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63.
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1942. Reflexive verbs, Latin,
Old French, Modern French. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
Haverling, Gerd V. M. 2010. Actionality, tense,
and viewpoint. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New
perspectives on historical Latin syntax, vol. 2: Constituent Syntax: Adverbial phrases,
adverbs, mood, tense, 277–524. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar
structure underlies telicity in “degree
achievements.” In Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), Proceedings
of
SALT IX, 127–144. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Heidinger, Steffen. 2010. French
anticausatives: A diachronic perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2014. The
persistence of labile verbs in the French causative-anticausative
alternation. Linguistics 52(4). 1003–1024.
Herman, József. 2002. La
disparition du passif synthétique latin: Nouvel essai sur l’ècrit et le parlé en latin
mérovingien. Estudis
Romànics 24. 31–46.
Hirt, Hermann. 1937. Indogermanische
Grammatik, Teil VII, Syntax II. Die Lehre vom einfachen und zusammengesetzten
Satz. Heidelberg: Winter.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity
in grammar and
discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299.
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2021. Anticausativization
and basic valency orientation in Latin. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds), Valency
over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency
orientation, 133–168. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2022. Cross-linguistic
sources of anticausative markers. Linguistic Typology at the
Crossroads 2(2). 127–186.
Joffre, Marie-Dominique. 1995. Le
verbe latin, voix et diathèse [Bibliothèque d’études classiques
4]. Louvain: Peeters.
Kulikov, Leonid. 1998. Passive,
anticausative and classification of Verbs: The case of
Vedic. In Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), Typology
of verbal
categories, 139–168. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 2011. Voice
typology. In Jae J. Song (ed), The
Oxford handbook of linguistic
typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2021. Les
verbes labiles dans l’histoire de la famille indo-européenne: une perspective typologique
diachronique. In Peter Lauwers, Katia Paykin, Mihaela Ilioaia, Machteld Meulleman & Pascale Hadermann (eds), Quand
le syntagme nominal prend ses marques : du prédicat à
l’argument, 191–216. Reims: EPURE.
Kulikov, Leonid & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2013. Reconstructing
passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Historical
Linguistics 3(1). 98–121.
Lehmann, Christian. 2016. Latin
causativization in typological perspective. In Paolo Poccetti (ed), Latinitatis
rationes. Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics,
Rome, 2013, 917–942. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity:
at the syntax-lexical semantics interface [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs
26]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Luraghi, Silvia. 2022. Basic
valency orientation, the anticausative alternation, and voice in
PIE. In Melanie Malzahn, Hannes Fellner & Theresa-Susanna Illés (eds.), Zurück
zur Wurzel — Struktur, Funktion und Semantik der Wurzel im Indogermanischen: Akten der Tagung der Indogermanischen
Gesellschaft vom 13. bis 16. September 2016 in
Wien, 185–196. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Luraghi, Silvia, Guglielmo Inglese & Daniel Kölligan. 2021. The
passive voice in ancient Indo-European languages: inflection, derivation, periphrastic verb
forms. Folia Linguistica
Historica 42(2). 339–391.
Martínez Rojas, Lucía, Verónica Orqueda, Francisca Toro Varela & Berta González Saavedra. 2021. Desarrollo
diacrónico de las funciones de se y sibi del latín arcaico al latín clásico. Boletín de
Filología 56. 483–557.
McMillion, Alan. 2006. Labile
verbs in English: their meaning, behavior and
structure. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing
and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic
Typology 8(2). 149–211.
Norberg, Dag Ludvig. 1943. Syntaktische Forschungen
auf dem Gebiet des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins [Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift
9]. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
Ongenae, Tim A. F. 2024. Permittito aperiat
oculum: Typological considerations on P-lability and its interaction with morphosyntactic alignment in Latin medical
texts. Folia Linguistica
Historica 45(1). 79–113.
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The
Oxford Latin syntax. Vol. 1: The simple
clause. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
R Core Team. 2025. R: A language
and environment for statistical
computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Ripley, Brian. 2009. nnet:
Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear models [R package].
. 2014. Case
marking in absolute constructions: further evidence for a semantically based alignment in Late
Latin. Journal of Latin
Linguistics 13(1). 115–143.
. 2019. Impersonal
passives and the suffix -r in the Indo-European
languages. In Michela Cennamo & Claudia Fabrizio (eds), Historical
Linguistics 2015: Selected papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27–31 July
2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory
348], 188–216. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sánchez Salor, E. 1981. El
incremento de la construcción intransitiva en latín tardío. Revista Española de
Lingüística 11(2). 373–410.
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The
syntax of (anti-)causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts [Linguistik
Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
