In:The Sounds of New Orleans: A sociophonetic study
Dana Serditova
[Varieties of English Around the World G74] 2026
► pp. xv–xvi
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
List of tables
Table 1.The sample data: Gender, ethnicity, education,
age distribution
age distribution
Table 2.Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood, NOLA
sample
Table 3.Generalized linear mixed model fit by maximum likelihood, Chalmette
sample
Table 4.Pillai scores for the PIN~PEN merger in New Orleans.
A general overview
A general overview
Table 5.Pillai scores for the PIN~PEN merger in New Orleans. Manner of
articulation for the following consonant: lateral
Table 6.Pillai scores for the PIN~PEN merger in New Orleans. Manner of
articulation for the following consonant: nasal
Table 7.Linear mixed model fit by REML testing the Pillai sores, New Orleans
sample
Table 8.Linear mixed model fit by REML testing the Bhattacharyya’s Affinity, New
Orleans sample
Table 9.Linear mixed model testing the Bhattacharyya’s Affinity for /ɪ/ and /ɛ/
before nasals, Chalmette sample
Table 10.Linear mixed model fit by REML testing the Bhattacharyya’s Affinity for
/ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals,
New Orleans sample
New Orleans sample
Table 11.Predicted values of F1 and F2 for /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ depending on the following
consonant (voiced or voiceless)
Table 12.Linear mixed model testing the Trajectory Length of /aɪ/ (normalized,
log-transformed), New Orleans sample
Table 13.An excerpt from a linear mixed model testing the Trajectory Length of
/aɪ/ (normalized, log-transformed), New Orleans sample
Table 14.Top 30 most frequent words and their trajectory length
