Cover not available

Article In: Written Language & Literacy
Vol. 29:2 (2026) ► pp.189–210

Plane-based writing

Sutton SignWriting and the organizational axis in writing-system typology

 | Independent scholar
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article contributes to writing-system typology by distinguishing the representational axis, what writing represents, from the organizational axis, how its primary written unit is composed for reading, correction, and reuse. Sutton SignWriting, a writing system for signed languages, shows why the representational question is necessary but incomplete. Its primary written unit is the signbox: a composed field in which selected symbols are arranged through placement, orientation, grouping, and relation. I define plane-based writing as an organizational descriptor for writing in which selected symbols are composed into recoverable spatial relation inside a bounded primary written unit. A worked signbox contrast, a passage-level lane example, and boundary-case comparisons show how SignWriting differs from other spatially organized systems. The argument presents Sutton SignWriting as a documented case showing why typology and literacy research should describe both representation and written-unit organization: readers, writers, and learners work with composed units, not only symbol inventories.
Article outline
  • 1.Classification problem
  • 2.Existing typologies and the missing layer
  • 3.The organizational axis
  • 4.The signbox as evidence
  • 5.Plane-based writing: Definition and boundaries
    • 5.1Definition, authorship, and variation
    • 5.2Boundary cases, iconicity, and partial labels
    • 5.3Internal structure with strong type-level positional determination
    • 5.4Spatial notation and layout
    • 5.5Sign-language transcription, serialization, and encoding
  • 6.Implications for literacy research
  • 7.Conclusion
  • References
References (36)
References
Bianchini, Claudia S. (2024). (D)écrire les Langues des Signes: Une approche grapholinguistique aux Langues des Signes. Brest: Fluxus Editions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contesse, Adrien, Morgane Rébulard, Chloé Thomas, Claudia S. Bianchini, Claire Danet, Léa Chevrefils & Patrick Doan (2022). Concevoir une fonte pour la transcription des mouth actions en langue des signes. Le système typographique Typannot. In Yannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st Century 2022, 781–816. Brest: Fluxus Editions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright (eds.) (1996). The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedorova, Liudmila L. (2021). On the typology of writing systems. In Yannis Haralambous (ed.), Grapholinguistics in the 21st century 2020: Proceedings, 805–824. Brest: Fluxus Editions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J. (1952). A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanke, Thomas (2004). HamNoSys–Representing sign language data in language resources and language processing contexts. In Oliver Streiter & Chiara Vettori (eds.), Proceedings of the LREC2004 Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: From SignWriting to Image Processing, 1–6. Lisbon: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Roy (1990). On redefining linguistics. In Hayley G. Davis & Talbot J. Taylor (eds.), Redefining linguistics, 18–52. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann-Dilloway, Erika (2011). Writing the smile: Language ideologies in, and through, sign language scripts. Language & Communication 31(4): 345–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). (Don’t) write my lips: Interpretations of the relationship between German Sign Language and German across scales of SignWriting practice. Signs and Society 1(2): 243–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joyce, Terry & Susanne R. Borgwaldt (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction. Written Language & Literacy 14(1): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis (2021). Alternative criteria for writing system typology: Cross-linguistic observations from the German and Japanese writing systems. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40(3): 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarty, Amy L. (2004). Notation systems for reading and writing sign language. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior 20: 129–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, Dimitrios (2020). The nature of writing: A theory of grapholinguistics. (Grapholinguistics and Its Applications, 3.) Brest: Fluxus Editions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2026). The normativity of linearity in writing and linguistics. In Heather Winskel & Hye K. Pae (eds.), Handbook of nonlinear writing systems: Complex processes and learning challenges, 43–64. Cham: Springer Nature. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meletis, Dimitrios & Christa Dürscheid (2022). Writing systems and their use: An overview of grapholinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.) (2012). Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, Henry (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey (1985). Writing systems: A linguistic introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slevinski, Steve (2026a). Sutton SignWriting Platform: Complete Eight-Series Release. Version 1.0.0. Zenodo. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2026b). Formal SignWriting. Version 1.0.0. Zenodo. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2026c). Sutton SignWriting Evidence and Adoption. Version 1.0.0. Zenodo. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. (Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 8.) Buffalo: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stumpf, Marianne Rossi (2005). Aprendizagem de escrita de língua de sinais pelo sistema SignWriting: Línguas de sinais no papel e no computador. PhD dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Sutton, Valerie (1995). Lessons in SignWriting. La Jolla, CA: Deaf Action Committee for SignWriting.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). ISWA 2010: International SignWriting Alphabet. La Jolla, CA: Center for Sutton Movement Writing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(n.d.). Writing ASL grammar in SignWriting: Writing in vertical columns. La Jolla, CA: Center for Sutton Movement Writing. Available at: [URL] (accessed 22 June 2026).
Thiessen, Stuart M. (2011). A grammar of SignWriting. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.
Treiman, Rebecca & Brett Kessler (2011). Similarities among the shapes of writing and their effects on learning. Written Language & Literacy 14(1): 39–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weingarten, Rüdiger (2011). Comparative graphematics. Written Language & Literacy 14(1): 12–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-dark jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold-light jbe-platform.quadraat-sans-bold prag Twitter_Logo_Blue