Cover not available

In:Organic Creativity and the Physics Within
Mea M.M. Lowcre
[Not in series 179] 2013
► pp. 53–56

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 27 March 2013
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.179.10ref
Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16–31). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrose, D. (1996). Unifying theories of creativity: Metaphorical thought and the unification process. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(3), 257–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: the magic synthesis. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attridge, D. (2004). The singularity of literature. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Avital, M., & Te'eni, D. (2009). From generative fit to generative capacity: Exploring an emerging dimension of information systems design and task performance. Information Systems Journal, 4(19), 345–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1988). Putting creativity to work. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 76–98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boden, M. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bois, J. S. (1972). Epistemics: The science-art of innovating. San Francisco, CA: International Society for General Semantics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, B., & Knight, D. (2008). Semiotic domains and non-textual technologies. Available at: [URL]
Carter, R. (2004). Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1966). Cartesian linguistics. A chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976/1989). The selfish gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. (1978). Linguistics and Creativity. Paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Linguistics (Louisville, Kentucky, April 1978).
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsom-Cook, M. (2001). Principles of interactive multimedia. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairbanks, M. S., & Taylor, R. P. (2011). Measuring the scaling properties of temporal and spatial patterns: From the human eye to the foraging albatross. In S. Guastello & R. Gregson (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamical analysis for the behavioral sciences using real data. New York, NY: CRC Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1986). On creativity and the unconscious. The psychology of art, literature, love, and religion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 288–321). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giedion, S. (1941). Space, time and architecture: The growth of a new tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1948). Mechanization takes command, a contribution to anonymous history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goswami, A. (1996). Creativity and the quantum: A unified theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 47–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, R. T. (2001). A model of 42 models of creativity, plus a new model derived from selecting 7 of them. Available at: [URL]
(2004). A model of 60 models of creativity for studying how particular repertoires of such models in creators affect their creativity. Available at: [URL]
Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evolving-systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 243–270). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, R. (1971). Anatomy of a scientific institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heilman, K. M., Nadeau, S. E., & Beversdorf, D. O. (2003). Creative innovation: Possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase, 9 (5), 369–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heisenberg, W. (1952). Die Physik der Atomkerne [The physics of atomic nuclei]. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. L. F. (1969). Treatise on physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 1–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoorn, J. F. (2012). Epistemics of the virtual. Linguistic approaches to literature 12. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 202–219). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirkham, R. L. (1984). Does the Gettier problem rest on a mistake? Mind, 93(372), 501–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowcre, M. M. M. (2011). Creativity: Meaning, Mechanisms, Models. Lorentz Workshop in collaboration with KNAW and NIAS (Sept. 12-16, 2011). Leiden, NL: Lorentz Center. Available at: [URL]
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. (2000). Insights of genius. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molella, A. P. (2002). Classics revisited: science moderne, Sigfried Giedion. Technology and Culture, 43, 374–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moran, S. (2010). The roles of creativity in society. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 74–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paffen, C. L. E., Verstraten, F. A. J., & Vidnyanszky, Z. (2008). Attention-based perceptual learning increases binocular rivalry suppression of irrelevant visual features. Journal of Vision, 8(4):25, 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (1988). The possibility of invention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 362–385). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. Trans. C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poelman, W. (2005). Design for living. International Conference on Doing, Thinking, Feeling Home: The Mental Geography of Residential Environments (Oct. 14-15, 2005, Technical University Delft). Available at: [URL]
Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pope, R., & Swann, J. (2011). Introduction: creativity, language, literature. In Swann, J., Pope, R., & Carter, R. (Eds.), Creativity in language and literature: The state of the art (pp. 1–22). Basingstoke, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ryland, S. (2011). Resisting metaphors: A metonymic approach to the study of creativity and cognition in art analysis and practice. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Brighton / University for the Creative Arts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1988). Creativity as a mechanical process. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 220–238). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaub, A., Herst, D., Surya, T., & Agrivina, I. (2011). Intercontinental collaboration on prosthetic design. In B. van Abel, R. Klaassen, L. Evers, & P. Troxler (Eds.), Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1944/2010). What is life? Mind and matter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership, and chance. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 386–426). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sennet, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
St. Clair, R. N. (2002). Metaphor and linguistic creativity. Keynote Address: Trinity University. Available at: [URL]
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, C. W., (1988). Approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 118–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 43–75). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Abel, B., Klaassen, R., Evers, L., & Troxler, P. (Eds.) (2011). Open design now. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, D., Kresin, F., Reitenbach, M., & Rennen, E. (2011). Users as designers. Amsterdam: Waag Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Osch, W., & Avital, M., (2010). Generative collectives. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Saint Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Graevenitz, A. (2009). Joseph Beuys’ letzte Leitern Scala Libera und Scala Napolitana (1985). In M. Vahler, M. Vöhler, & D. Linck (Eds.), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten: Transformationen des aristotelischen Modells seit Bernays, Nietzsche und Freud (pp. 255–292) [Boundaries of catharsis in the modern arts: Transformations of the Aristotelian model since Bernays, Nietzsche and Freud]. Berlin, GE: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, W., & Poe, R. (1996). The Einstein factor: A proven new method for increasing your intelligence. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1880–1882. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zawada, B. (2006). Linguistic creativity from a cognitive perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 24(2), 235–254. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue