Article published in:
Learning Chinese in Diasporic Communities: Many pathways to being Chinese
Edited by Xiao Lan Curdt-Christiansen and Andy Hancock
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 12] 2014
► pp. 97–116

Chapter 5. Learning and teaching Chinese in the Netherlands

The metapragmatics of a polycentric language

| Tilburg University
| University of Luxembourg
This paper is concerned with the metapragmatics of Chinese as a polycentric language. Based on ethnographic observations and interviews in and around a Chinese complementary school in the Netherlands, this paper describes an ongoing shift along with demographic, economic and political changes, in what counts as Chinese: a shift from Hong Kong and Taipei to Beijing as the most powerful centre of Chinese in the world. Migration makes communicative resources like language varieties globally mobile and this affects the normativity in the diaspora classroom. A clearer understanding of the metapragmatics of Chinese is useful because it provides a key to understanding social identities in contemporary Chinese migration contexts and to understanding language within contexts of current globalisation.
Published online: 10 July 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.12.06li
References
Appadurai, A
1996  Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation . Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A
2010  Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J
2005  Discourse: A Critical Introduction . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Artefactual ideologies and the textual production of African languages. Language & Communication 28: 291–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010  The Sociolinguistics of Globalization . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B
2011 Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S
2013  Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
CBS
2010 Herkomst van Chinezen in Nederland. In Bevolkingstrends: Statistisch Kwartaalblad over de demografie van Nederland. Jaargang 58, 1e kwartaal, 6-6. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek.Google Scholar
Clyne, M
. (ed) 1992  Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, J
2009 Social reproduction in classrooms and schools. Annual Review of Anthropology 38 : 33–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. & Slembrouck, S
2006 ‘You don’t know what they translate’: Language contact, institutional procedure, and literacy practice in neighborhood health clinics in urban Flanders. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16(2): 1055–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. & Blackledge, A
2012 Voice and meaning-making in team ethnography. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 43(3): 306–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Researching bilingual and multilingual education. In The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education , W.E. Wright, S. Boun & O. García (eds). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, X.L
2013 Family language policy: Sociopolitical reality versus linguistic continuity. Language Policy 12: 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J
1984  The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy . Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dong, J
2010 The enregisterment of Putonghua in practice. Language & Communication 30(4): 265–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ethnologue
2009 In Ethnologue: Languages of the World , 16th edn, M.P. Lewis (ed.). Dallas TX: SIL International. <www​.ethnologue​.com>Google Scholar
Francis, B., Archer, L. & Mau, A
2009 Language as capital, or language as identity? Chinese complementary school pupils' perspectives on the purposes and benefits of complementary schools. British Educational Research Journal 35(4): 519–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S.B. & Street, B
2008  On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research . New York NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M
2011  Paths to Post-nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity . Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J
2005 Linguistic sabotage in a context of monolingualism and standardization. Language & Communication 25(3): 279–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. & Juffermans, K
2012 Chinese complementary schooling in the Netherlands: experiences and identities of final year students. In Mother Tongue and Intercultural Valorization: Europe and its Migrant Youth , F. Grande, J.J. de Ruiter & M. Spotti (eds), 61–80. Milano: Franco Angeli Publication.Google Scholar
Li Wei & Wu, C.-J
2009 Polite Chinese children revisited: Creativity and the use of codeswitching in the Chinese complementary school classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12(2): 193–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A
. (eds) 2007  Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.S
2008  Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A
2012  Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, B
2007 Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 584–607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M
1993 Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics , J.A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S
2011  Chinezen in Nederland . Utrecht: Forum: Instituut voor Multiculturele Vraagstukken.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hancock, Andy
2016. Creating a dialogic space for research: a reading conference in a Chinese complementary school. Language and Education 30:2 ► pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Staicov, Adina
2020.  In Creating Belonging in San Francisco Chinatown’s Diasporic Community, ► pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
Yang, Yilu
2021. Reflexive language attitudes and language practices among school-aged Chinese Australian immigrant bilinguals. Asia Pacific Education Review 22:3 ► pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.