Cover not available
Part of
Learning Chinese in Diasporic Communities: Many pathways to being Chinese
Edited by Xiao Lan Curdt-Christiansen and Andy Hancock
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 12] 2014
► pp. 97–116

Chapter 5. Learning and teaching Chinese in the Netherlands

The metapragmatics of a polycentric language

| Tilburg University
| University of Luxembourg
This paper is concerned with the metapragmatics of Chinese as a polycentric language. Based on ethnographic observations and interviews in and around a Chinese complementary school in the Netherlands, this paper describes an ongoing shift along with demographic, economic and political changes, in what counts as Chinese: a shift from Hong Kong and Taipei to Beijing as the most powerful centre of Chinese in the world. Migration makes communicative resources like language varieties globally mobile and this affects the normativity in the diaspora classroom. A clearer understanding of the metapragmatics of Chinese is useful because it provides a key to understanding social identities in contemporary Chinese migration contexts and to understanding language within contexts of current globalisation.
Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.12.06li
References (29)
References
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation . Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. 2010. Multilingualism: A Critical Perspective . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Artefactual ideologies and the textual production of African languages. Language & Communication 28: 291–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. 2013. Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
CBS. 2010. Herkomst van Chinezen in Nederland. In Bevolkingstrends: Statistisch Kwartaalblad over de demografie van Nederland. Jaargang 58, 1e kwartaal, 6-6. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (ed.) 1992. Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, J. 2009. Social reproduction in classrooms and schools. Annual Review of Anthropology 38 : 33–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. & Slembrouck, S. 2006. ‘You don’t know what they translate’: Language contact, institutional procedure, and literacy practice in neighborhood health clinics in urban Flanders. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16(2): 1055–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. 2012. Voice and meaning-making in team ethnography. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 43(3): 306–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Researching bilingual and multilingual education. In The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education , W.E. Wright, S. Boun & O. García (eds). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Curdt-Christiansen, X.L. 2013. Family language policy: Sociopolitical reality versus linguistic continuity. Language Policy 12: 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J. 1984. The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy . Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Dong, J. 2010. The enregisterment of Putonghua in practice. Language & Communication 30(4): 265–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ethnologue. 2009. In Ethnologue: Languages of the World , 16th edn, M.P. Lewis (ed.). Dallas TX: SIL International. [URL]Google Scholar
Francis, B., Archer, L. & Mau, A. 2009. Language as capital, or language as identity? Chinese complementary school pupils' perspectives on the purposes and benefits of complementary schools. British Educational Research Journal 35(4): 519–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, S.B. & Street, B. 2008. On Ethnography: Approaches to Language and Literacy Research . New York NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 2011. Paths to Post-nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J. 2005. Linguistic sabotage in a context of monolingualism and standardization. Language & Communication 25(3): 279–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, J. & Juffermans, K. 2012. Chinese complementary schooling in the Netherlands: experiences and identities of final year students. In Mother Tongue and Intercultural Valorization: Europe and its Migrant Youth , F. Grande, J.J. de Ruiter & M. Spotti (eds), 61–80. Milano: Franco Angeli Publication.Google Scholar
Li Wei & Wu, C.-J. 2009. Polite Chinese children revisited: Creativity and the use of codeswitching in the Chinese complementary school classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 12(2): 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. (eds). 2007. Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.S. 2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. 2012. Language and Mobility: Unexpected Places . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2007. Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(5): 584–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. 1993. Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics , J.A. Lucy (ed.), 33–58. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S. 2011. Chinezen in Nederland . Utrecht: Forum: Instituut voor Multiculturele Vraagstukken.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Li, Xiangyun & Qi Shen
2024. Individual agency in language-in-education policy: a story of Chinese heritage language schools in multilingual Brussels. Current Issues in Language Planning 25:2 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Nordstrom, Janica, Ken Cruickshank & Emily Li Bai
2024. Community language schools: a scoping review of research, 2001 to 2023. Cambridge Journal of Education 54:5 ► pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Sherman
2022. The Chinese Diaspora: Language Maintenance and Loss. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 690 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yilu
2021. Reflexive language attitudes and language practices among school-aged Chinese Australian immigrant bilinguals. Asia Pacific Education Review 22:3 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yilu
2022. In-between Chinese and English: Chinese Language Learning Process. In Chinese Language Use by School-Aged Chinese Australians, ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Yilu
2022. Introduction. In Chinese Language Use by School-Aged Chinese Australians, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Staicov, Adina
2020. Constructing Chinese Americanness in San Francisco Chinatown. In Creating Belonging in San Francisco Chinatown’s Diasporic Community, ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Hancock, Andy
2016. Creating a dialogic space for research: a reading conference in a Chinese complementary school. Language and Education 30:2 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Language Diasporas. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 611 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.