Cover not available
Part of
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 39–58

Chapter 2
How to internationalise and empower academic research?

The role of language and academic conventions in Linguistics

| Vytautas Magnus University
| Vytautas Magnus University
The current chapter accounts for the trends of internationalisation in research papers in Linguistics with a primary focus on academic conventions in articles published in a national journal in various languages (including Lithuanian and English) as compared to those published in a well-established international journal (solely in English). The trends of internationalisation are assessed with regard to the overall journal structure, publication languages, the degree of transnational cooperation, and the rhetorical structure of the papers. Based on the results, it is argued that in the field of Linguistics it is not so much the language that predetermines differences in the two journals, but the academic conventions that differ across cultures and publishing houses.
Keywords: research articles in Linguistics, internationalisation, publication language, transnational cooperation, rhetorical structure, academic conventions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Main features of the journals
      • 3.1.1Journal sections
      • 3.1.2Language-scape in Baltistica
      • 3.1.3Transnational cooperation and co-authorship
    • 3.2The macro-structure of research articles
      • 3.2.1The overall structure of RAs
      • 3.2.2Introductions in RAs
      • 3.2.3Description of data and methods
      • 3.2.4Concluding section(s) in RAs
  • 4.Conclusions and implications
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.02ruz
References (32)
References
Ahmad, U. (1997). Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 273–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belcher, D. D., Serrano, F. J. B., & Yang, H. S. (2016). English for professional academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), English as the academic lingua franca: The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 502–514). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (Ed.). (2014). The semiperiphery of academic writing: Discourses, communities and practices. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical strategies. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196–225). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). A geopolitics of academic writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlino, P. (2012). Helping doctoral students of education to face writing and emotional challenges in identity transition. In C. Donahue & M. Castello (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 217–234). Bingley: Emerald.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dagienė, E., Petrauskaitė, R., & Sandström, U. (2017). Lithuanian research journals: Are they ready for almetrics ranking? Paper presented at the STI Conference, Paris,.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. (2005). Is English really a Tyrannosaurus rex? Scientific communication and the global spread of English. In P. Durán, G. Aguado De Cea, & A. M. Roldán Riejos (Eds.), Reflections on language use in the academic context (pp. 73–93). Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, K., & Swales, J. M. (1994). Competition and discourse community: Introductions from Nysvenska studier. In B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and talk in professional contexts (pp. 9–21). Uppsala: ASLA.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gross, A. (1990). The rhetoric of science: The rhetorical analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kwan, B. S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing in doctoral programs: The Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59, 55–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lea, M., & Stierer, B. (2011). Changing academic identities in changing academic workplaces: Learning from academics’ everyday professional writing practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 16, 605–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Rai, L. (2011). A case-study of research-based collaboration around writing in social work. Across the Disciplines: A Journal of Language, Learning and Academic Writing, 8. Retrieved from <[URL]> (14 March, 2017).
Lillis, T., & Tuck, J. (2016). Academic literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the academy. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), English as the academic lingua franca: The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 30–43). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Loi, C. K. (2010). Research article introductions in Chinese and English: A comparative genre-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 267–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín, P., & León Pérez, I. K. (2014). Convincing peers of the value of one’s research: A genre analysis of rhetorical promotion in academic texts. English for Specific Purposes, 34, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2004). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in English-Finnish economics texts. In G. M. Saracino (Ed.), Writing for scholarly publication in English: Issues for nonnative speakers (pp. 126–156). Cesario di Lecce: Manni.Google Scholar
Mauranen, A., Pérez-Llantada, C., & Swales, J. M. (2010). Academic Englishes: A standardized knowledge? In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of World Englishes (pp. 634–652). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2012). Scientific discourse and the rhetoric of globalization: The impact of culture and language. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genre: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Teichler, U. (2009). Internationalisation of higher education: European experiences. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 93–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2006). ‘So what is the problem this book addresses?’ Interactions in book reviews. Text and Talk, 27, 767–790. DOI logoGoogle Scholar