Chapter published in:
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 105128


Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F.
(2009) Promotional (meta) discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1979) The American standard for writing abstracts. New York: ANSI Publication.
Anthony, L.
(2011) AntConc (Version 3.2.4w) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://​www​.antlab​.sci​.waseda​.ac​.jp/
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T.
(2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bordet, G.
(2009) A comparative study of PhD abstracts written in English by native and non native speakers across different disciplines. In M. Mahlberg, V. González-Diaz, & Catherine Smith (eds), Proceedings from Corpus Linguistics. Liverpool: University of Liverpool. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/publications​/cl2009/
Dahl, T.
(2000) Lexical cohesion-based text condensation: An evaluation of automatically produced summaries of research articles by comparison with author-written abstracts (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Bergen, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
Friginal, E., & Mustafa, S. S.
(2017) A comparison of US-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 45–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F.
(2010) Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, H.
(1993) Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 56–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B.
(1996) Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistics perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Graetz, N.
(1985) Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ulijn & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes. Methods and materials in teaching language (pp.123–135). Amersfoort: ACCO.Google Scholar
Hanania, E. A., & Akhtar, K.
(1985) Verb form and rhetorical function in science writing: A study of MS theses in biology, chemistry, and physics. English for Specific Purposes, 4(1), 49–58.Google Scholar
Hartley, J.
(2003) Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in Psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinkel, E.
(2002) Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2011) Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795–2809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huckin, T.
(2001) Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications (pp. 93–103). Birmingham: The University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
(1993) Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp. 57–73). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
(1994) Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 191–198). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2011) Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland, (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2000) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2002) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics. 34(8), 1091–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) English for Academic Purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Milton, J.
(1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of second language writing, 6(2), 183–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2005) Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, M. P.
(1991) The linguistic genre of abstracts. In A. Della Volpe (Ed.), The seventeenth LACUS forum 1990 (pp. 507–527). Lake Bluff, IL: LACUS.Google Scholar
Koutsantoni, D.
(2006) Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 19–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B.
(1987) Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1979) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lorés, R.
(2004) On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melander, B., Swales, J., & Fredrickson, K.
(1997) Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the US and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse (pp. 251–272). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pho, P. D.
(2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F.
(1990) Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research-and text-type. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 10(4), 365–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(2), 93–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samraj, B.
(2002a) Disciplinary variation in abstracts: The case of Wildlife Behaviour and Conservation Biology. Academic Discourse, 40–56.Google Scholar
(2002b) Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P.
(2000) Towards classifying the arguments in research genres. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analysing professional genres (pp. 41–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stotesbury, H.
(2003) Evaluation in research article abstracts in the narrative and hard sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 327–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B.
(2009) Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, D.
(1990) How to write and publish a scientific paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Bonn, S., & Swales, J. M.
(2007) English and French journal abstracts in the Language Sciences: Three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 93–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ventola, E.
(1994) Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In S. Cmejrkova, F. Danes, & E. Havlova (Eds.), Writing vs. speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333–352). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Wenger, E.
(2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yakhontova, T.
(2002) ‘Selling’ or ‘telling’? The issue of cultural variation in research genres. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.). Academic discourse (pp. 216–232). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar