Cover not available
Part of
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 151–171

Chapter 7
Conference abstracts in English

A challenge for non-Anglophone writers

| Masaryk University
With the growing internationalisation of all scholarship the use of English as an international lingua franca has become an important prerequisite for scholars who intend to submit their abstracts and present their research to an academic audience at international conferences. Consequently, scholars from non-Anglophone backgrounds have to master the writing of this research-process genre (Swales, 1990) in English, since otherwise they may risk being refused participation at conferences and publication in conference proceedings. This chapter analyses the textual organisation of conference abstracts (CAs) written in English with the aim of finding out whether there is intercultural variation in rhetorical moves and their linguistic realisations applied by Anglophone scholars and those from some countries where Slavonic languages are spoken.
Keywords: intercultural variation, conference abstracts, rhetorical structure, moves, move analysis, tense, aspect and voice of finite verbs, classes of grammatical subjects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus and methodology
    • 2.1Corpus
    • 2.2Methodology
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Macrostructure of CAs
    • 3.2Selected linguistic realisations of CAs
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.07pov
References (41)
References
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (2010). Academic discourse in Portugal: A whole different ballgame? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 21–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Discourses of knowledge: Cultural disjunctions and their implications for the language industries. In C. Haase & J. Schmied (Eds.), English for academic purposes: Practical and theoretical approaches. REAL studies 7 (pp. 41–54). Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. (2007). Discourse on the move. Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, M., & Lorés-Sanz, R. (2014). (Eds.). Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamonikolasová, J. (2005). Comparing the structures of academic texts written in English and Czech. In M. Huttová, A. Bohmerová, A. Keníž, & E. Tandlichová (Eds.), Slovak studies in English 1 (pp. 77–84). Bratislava: Comenius University.Google Scholar
Čmejrková, S. (1992). Non-native (academic) writing. In S. Čmejrková, & F. Daneš (Eds.), Writing vs speaking. Language, text, discourse, communication. Proceedings of the Conference held at the Czech Language Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague (pp. 303–310). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Čmejrková, S., & Daneš, F. (1997). Academic writing and cultural identity: The case of Czech academic writing. In A. Duzsak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse. (pp. 40–62). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, R. A. (1995). Scientific English: A guide for scientists and other professionals (2nd ed.). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.Google Scholar
Diani, G. (2014). On English and Italian research article abstracts: Genre variation across cultures. In M. Bondi, & R. Lorés-Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change (pp. 65–83). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012). Cross-cultural differences in the construal of authorial voice in the genre of diploma theses. In C. Berkenkotter, V. K. Bhatia, & M. Gotti (Eds.), Insights into academic genres. Linguistic insights. Studies in language and communication. (pp. 301–328). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Graetz, N. (1985). Teaching EFL students to extract structural information from abstracts. In J. M. Ulign & A. K. Pugh (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes: Methods and materials in teaching languages (pp. 123–135). Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Hemais, B. (2001). The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 39–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
(2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1–23.Google Scholar
Kafes, H. (2012). Cultural traces on the rhetorical organization of research article abstracts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(3), 207–220.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Lost (and gained) in translation: A contrastive (English/Spanish) analysis of rhetorical and lexicogrammatical patterns in sociology research article abstracts. In M. Bondi & R. Lorés-Sanz (Eds.), Abstracts in academic discourse: Variation and change (pp. 85–110). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martín-Martín, P. (2002). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, S. P. (1992). A method for analyzing sentence-level differences in disciplinary knowledge making. Written Communication, 9(4), 533–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2008). Analysing engagement markers cross-culturally: The case of English and Spanish business management research articles. In S. Burgess & P. Martín-Martín (Eds.), English as an additional language in research publication and communication. Linguistic insights. Studies in language and communication (pp. 197–213). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2011). Constructing the ideal readership: Heteroglossic (dis)engagement in research writing practices across cultures. In V. K. Bhatia, P. Sánchez, & P. Pérez-Paredes (Eds.), Researching specialised languages (pp. 25–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2014). Scientific discourse and the rhetoric of globalization. London: Blooomsbury.Google Scholar
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Povolná, R. (2012). Cross-cultural differences in the use of discourse markers by Czech and German students of English in the genre of Master’s theses. In C. Berkenkotter, V. K. Bhatia, & M. Gotti (Eds.), Insights into academic genres. Linguistic insights. Studies in language and communication (pp. 329–351). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2016). Cross-cultural analysis of conference abstracts. Discourse and Interaction, 9(1), 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move-analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(2), 93–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samraj, B. (2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 141–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499.Google Scholar
Schmied, J. (2011). Academic writing in Europe: A survey of approaches. In J. Schmied (Ed.), Academic writing in Europe: Empirical perspectives. REAL studies 5 (pp. 1–22). Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.Google Scholar
Stašková, S. (2005). Options of identity: Authorial presence in research article abstracts. In M. Huttová, A. Bohmerová, A. Keníž, & E. Tandlichová (Eds.), Slovak studies in English 1 (pp. 201–207). Bratislava: Comenius University.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introduction. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston. Language Studies Unit.Google Scholar
(1990). Genre analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Research genres. Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vassileva, I. (2000). Who is the author? A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1994). Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In S. Čmejrková, F. Daneš, & E. Havlová (Eds.), Writing vs speaking. Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333–352). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Wagner, S. (2011). Concessives and contrastives in student writing: L1, L2 and genre differences. In J. Schmied (Ed.), Academic writing in Europe: Empirical perspectives. REAL studies 5 (pp. 23–48). Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Povolná, Renata
2020. Persuasion in Technical Discourse: The Role of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in User Manuals. In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses, ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Zibalas, Deividas & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2019. RHETORICAL STRUCTURE OF PROMOTIONAL GENRES: THE CASE OF RESEARCH ARTICLE AND CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS. Discourse and Interaction 12:2 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Murillo, Silvia
2018. Chapter 11. Not the same, but how different?. In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.