Chapter published in:
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 195216
References

References

Anthony, L.
Becher, T.
(1994) The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher education, 19(2), 151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
(2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman grammar of written and spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biglan, A.
(1973) The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bodde, B.
(1991) Chinese thought, society and science: The intellectual and social background of science and technology in pre-modern China. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Çandarli D., Bayyurt, Y., & Marti, L.
(2015) Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W., & Nichols, J.
(Eds.) (1986) Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chan, T. H. T.
(2015) A corpus-based study of the expression of stance in dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 176–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T.
(2003) Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 59(3), 393–424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U.
(2011) Intercultural rhetoric in second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. K.
(2017) Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, L., & Ginther, A.
(2000) Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2012) Current conceptions of stance. Stance and voice in written academic genres. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L.
(1999) Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G.
(1994) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Hu, G., & Cao, F.
(2011) Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(11), 2795–2809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G.
(2001) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K.
(1996) Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(3), 349–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 99–121). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001) Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), 1091–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Disciplinary discourses. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
(2005a) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2005b) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F.
(2016) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Milton, J.
(1997) Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F.
(2015) Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 90–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kong, K. C.
(2006) Linguistic resources as evaluators in English and Chinese research articles. Multilingua, 25, 183–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, C. H.
(1999) The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 121–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1972) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, 183–228.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Z.
(2014) Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication, 31(1), 27–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Expressing stance in undergraduate writing: Discipline-specific and general qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. Y. W., & Chen, S. X.
(2009) Making a bigger deal of the smaller words: Function words and other key items in research writing by Chinese learners. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), 149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E.
(2014) Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46, 39–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leedham, M., & Fernandez-Parra, M.
(2017) Recounting and reflecting: The use of first person pronouns in Chinese, Greek and British students’ assignments in engineering. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 66–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R.
(2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A.
(1993) Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Meta-text in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3–22.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Kifle, N. A.
(2002) Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second-language writers. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp.182–195). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P.
(2011) An intercultural analysis of metadiscourse features in research articles written in English and in Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3068–3079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A contemporary grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Shen, F.
(1989) The classroom and the wider culture: Identity as a key to learning English composition. College Composition and Communication, 40(4), 459–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., & Chen, T.
(1991) Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takimoto, M.
(2015) Assertions and lexical invisibility in EFL learners’ academic essays. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 85–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, R., & John, S.
(1999) The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 23–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
(2000) Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R.
(2002) Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57(2), 89–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, W. J.
(1985) Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y.
(2013) Exploring linguistic and cultural variations in the use of hedges in English and Chinese scientific discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 23–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Shchemeleva, Irina
2020. Discipline and methodological paradigm. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1:2  pp. 92 ff. Crossref logo
Szczygłowska, Tatiana
2020. Creating the Authorial Self in Academic Texts: Evidence From the Expert’s Style of Writing. English Studies at NBU 6:1  pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Jingjing & Liangjing Zeng
2021. Disciplinary Recognized Self-Presence: Self-Mention Used With Hedges and Boosters in PhD Students’ Research Writing. SAGE Open 11:2  pp. 215824402110054 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.