Cover not available
Part of
Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 217–235

Chapter 10
Publishing in English

ELF writers, textual voices and metadiscourse

Editors
| University of Modena
| Reggio Emilia
In a global academic environment, increasing attention has been paid to the international use of English for publication purposes. The chapter presents a corpus-based study of the differences between authors’ final versions – seen as a case of writing in English as Lingua Franca – and published versions of papers. The economics component of the SciELF corpus – a collection of unrevised articles by ELF users – is compared to a larger corpus of published articles in Business and Economics. The comparison confirms the “cooperative imperative” of ELF users, though limited to a restricted range of general markers, and suggests a “selling imperative” in the process of revision, emphasizing authorial presence through personal deixis, epistemic markers and lexical cohesion.
Keywords: academic publishing in English, corpus analysis, ELF, textual voices, metadiscourse, language brokers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Reflexivity and intertextuality in academic discourse
  • 3.Materials and methods
  • 4.Positive keywords: Features of unedited text
    • 4.1Overview
    • 4.2Analyse/analysed/analysis
    • 4.3Metadiscursive verbs
    • 4.4Metadiscursive nouns
  • 5.Negative keywords: Features of published texts
  • 6.Final remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.10bon
References (36)
References
Anderson, L. (2010). Standards of acceptability in English as an academic Lingua Franca: Evidence from a corpus of peer-reviewed working papers by international students. In R. Cagliero & J. Jenkins (Eds.), Discourses, communities, and global Englishes (pp. 115–144). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bornmann, L., Wymouth, C., & Daniel, H. D. (2010). A content analysis of referees’ comments. How do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high impact journal and later published in either a low or high impact journal differ. Scientometrica, 83, 493–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2003). Shapers of published NNS research articles. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 223–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (1996). Nondiscursive requirements in academic publishing, material resources of periphery scholars, and the politics of knowledge production. Written Communication, 13, 435–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniam, D. (2012). Exploring reviewer reactions to manuscripts submitted to academic journals. System, 40(4), 544–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englander, K. (2009). Transformation of the identities of nonnative English speaking scientists. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 8, 35–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G., Pérez-Llantada C., & Plo, R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: A study of attitudes. World Englishes, 30, 41–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 243–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Attitudes of journal editors towards nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 121–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Wang, S. H. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gosden, H. (2003). ‘Why not give us the full story?’ Functions of referees’ comments in peer reviews of scientific research papers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(2), 87–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heng Hartse, J., & Kubota, R. (2014). Pluralizing English? Variation in high-stakes academic texts and challenges of copyediting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 71–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewings, M. (2004). An ‘important contribution’ or ‘tiresome reading’? A study of evaluation in peer reviews of journal article submissions. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 247–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2014). Introductory chapter: Dialogue, community and persuasion in research writing. In L. Gil-Salom & C. Soler-Monreal (Eds.), Dialogicity in written specialised genres (pp. 3–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Sancho-Guinda, C. (Eds.) (2012). Stance and voice in written academic genres. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hynninen, N. (2013). Language regulation in English as a lingua franca: Exploring language-regulatory practices in academic spoken discourse (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Jiang, K. F., & Hyland, K. (2016). Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, 37, 1–25.Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written communication, 23(1), 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). Academic writing in a global context. The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2011). The construction of the author’s voice in academic writing: The interplay of cultural and disciplinary factors. Text & Talk, 31(2), 173–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N., & Ranta, E. (2010). English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA Project. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), 183–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring English as a lingua franca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mungra, P., & Webber, P. (2010). Peer review process in medical research publications: Language and content comments. English for Specific Purposes, 29(1), 43–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2007). “I/we focus on…”: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6, 143–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Getting research published internationally in English: An ethnographic account of a team of finance Spanish scholars’ struggles. Ibérica, 24, 139–156.Google Scholar
Molino, A. (2010). Personal and impersonal authorial references: A contrastive Study of English and Italian linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 80–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, C. (2014). Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 84–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U. (2009). English in academia: Does nativeness matter? Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 20(2), 89–100.Google Scholar
Scott, M. 2012. WordSmith Tools (Version 6). Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
Seidlhofer, B. (2009). Accommodation and the idiom principle in English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(2), 195–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1988). Mirror for a text. Journal of English and Foreign Languages, 1, 15–44.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (1996). Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 501–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribble, C. (2017). ELFA vs. genre: A new paradigm war in EAP writing instruction? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 25, 30–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yakhontova, T. (2006). Cultural and disciplinary variation in academic discourse: The issue of influencing factors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 153–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Xu, Hui
2024. Variation mechanisms of metadiscourse verb patterns in English journal articles from intra- and interdisciplinary perspectives. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Maňáková, Monika
2021. Self-mention in the academic discourse of ELF writers. Topics in Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Guziurová, Tereza
2020. DISCOURSE REFLEXIVITY IN WRITTEN ACADEMIC ENGLISH AS LINGUA FRANCA: CODE GLOSSES IN RESEARCH ARTICLES. Discourse and Interaction 13:2 ► pp. 36 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.