Cover not available
Part of
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: Historical perspectives
Edited by Richard Smith and Tim Giesler
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 20] 2023
► pp. 2–22

Chapter 1
How can perspectives from Applied Linguistic Historiography improve our understanding of innovation?

| University of Warwick
| University of Bremen
As an emerging interdisciplinary, plurilingual and intercultural field (McLelland & Smith, 2018), the History of Language Learning and Teaching – and associated considerations of Applied Linguistic Historiography (Smith, 2016) – can be expected to provide useful perspectives on innovation: how, when and why to attempt it and how to sustain it, but also, from a relatively philosophical perspective, how to define and assess it. Innovation, after all, is an activity, or a construct, which is inextricably bound up with views of the past, whether imagined or well-researched – a past seen to be in need of replacement or at least reconstruction. Researching the past can, indeed, give rise to considerations of whether – and, if so, why and how – innovation occurs, or is seen to be required at all. In this introduction to a book devoted to historical perspectives on innovation, we consider three specific ways in which Applied Linguistic Historiography can contribute to a revised understanding of innovation in language teaching and we identify ways in which the chapters in the book shed new light on its nature, causes, effects and rationale.
Article outline
  • Why are historical perspectives on innovation needed?
  • How did innovation rise to prominence?
  • Characterizing and identifying innovation
  • Managing innovation with historical sense
  • Aspects of innovation, from chapter authors’ perspectives
    • Product innovation
    • Innovation through scientific discovery
    • Oscillations along a continuum
    • Adaptation in specific contexts
  • Conclusion
  • Note on peer reviews, editorial assistance and translations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.20.01smi
References (54)
References
Anderson, J. (2017). A potted history of PPP with the help of ELT Journal. ELT Journal, 71(2), 218–227.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1954). The crisis in education. Retrieved on 22 November 2022 from [URL]
Besse, H. (2014). La Société Internationale pour l’Histoire du Français Langue Étrangère ou Seconde (SIHFLES), ou vingt-cinq ans d’investigations historiographiques sur l’enseignement/apprentissage du français langue étrangère ou seconde, Language & History, 57(1), 26–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boslaugh, S. E. (n.d.). Innovation. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved on 9 October 2022 from [URL]
Braudel, F. (1966). La Méditerranée et le monde méditerrranéen à l’époque de Philippe II (3 Vols). Librairie Armand Colin.Google Scholar
British Council (n.d.). ELTons innovation awards. Retrieved on 9 October 2022 from [URL]
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice. Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Doff, S., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2022). Policies and practice in language learning and teaching: 20th-century historical perspectives. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Edquist, C., & Johnson, B. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In C. Edquist (Ed.), Systems of innovation (pp. 41–63). Pinter.Google Scholar
Fay, S. B. (1947). The idea of progress. The American Historical Review, 52(2), 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giesler, T. (2015). Here be dragons. Von einer “Mythologie” zu einer “Morphologie” des Fremdsprachenunterrichts. IJHE Bildungsgeschichte, 5(2), 146–161.Google Scholar
(2018a). Die Formation des institutionellen Englischunterrichts. Englisch als erste Fremdsprache in Bremen (1855–1873). WVT.Google Scholar
(2018b). To kill two birds with one stone. Combining language and content since the 19th century. In N. McLelland & R. Smith (Eds.), The history of language learning and teaching, Vol. 2: 19th–20th century Europe (pp. 76–86). LegendaGoogle Scholar
(2021). Start afresh or return? The impact of the Reform Movement on northern German English language teaching. Language & History, 64(3), 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandstrand, O. (1994). Technological, technical and economic dynamics –Towards a Systems Analysis Framework. In O. Grandstrand (Ed.), Economics of technology (pp.190–221). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hall, D. (1997). Why projects fail. In B. Kenny & W. Savage (Eds.), Language and development: Teachers in a changing world. Longman.Google Scholar
Harber, C., & Davies, L. (1998). School management and effectiveness in developing countries: The post-bureaucratic school. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Henrichsen, L. E. (1989). Diffusion of innovations in English language teaching: The ELEC effort in Japan, 1956–1968. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R., & Smith, R. (2014). The history of teaching English as a foreign language, from a British and European perspective. Language & History, 57(1), 75–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D., & Smith, R. (2012). Unpackaging the past: ‘CLT’ through ELTJ keywords. ELT Journal, 66(4), 430–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 centuries of language teaching. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, S. (1966). Malthus and the idea of progress. Journal of the History of Ideas, 27(1), 92–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malerba, F. (2000). Economia dell‘innovazione. Carrocci.Google Scholar
McLelland, N., & Smith, R. (Eds.). (2014). History of modern language education in Europe. Special issue of Language & History, 57(1).Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2018). The history of language learning and teaching (3 Vols). Legenda. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Rangers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. Potomac Associates.Google Scholar
Musumeci, D. (1997). Breaking tradition: An exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. (1994). History of the idea of progress (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Nye, D. E. (1994). American technological sublime. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
OECD. (2017). The OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
OECD/Eurostat (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of Method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sayers, S. (2018). Marx and teleology. Science & Society, 83(1), 37–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmenk, B., Breidbach, S., & Küster, L. (2018). Introduction: Sloganization in language education discourse. In B. Schmenk, S. Breidbach, & L. Küster (Eds.), Sloganization in language education discourse (pp. 1–18). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (2013). Harold E. Palmer, IRLT and “historical sense” in ELT. IRLT Journal, 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
(2016). Building “Applied Linguistic Historiography”: Rationale, scope and methods. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 71–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, R., with Imura, M. (2004). Lessons from the past: Traditions and reforms. In V. Makarova & T. Rodgers (Eds.), English language teaching: The case of Japan. Lincom-Europa.Google Scholar
Smith, R., & McLelland, N. (Eds.) (2018). Histories of language learning and teaching in Europe. Special issue of The Language Learning Journal, 46(1).Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Issues and options in language teaching, ed. by P. Allen & B. Harley. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. (2011). Language teaching methodology. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 185–199). Routledge.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural imperialism. A critical introduction. Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tröhler, D. (2011). Languages of education. Protestant legacies, national identities, and global aspirations. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards Utopia – A century of public school reform. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “grammar” of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent-Lancrin, S., Urgel, J., Kar, S., & Jacotin, G. (2019). Measuring innovation in education 2019: What has changed in the classroom? OECD Publishing. Retrieved on 3 October 2022 from [URL]. DOI logo
Waters, A. (2009). Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching, 42(4), 421–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedell, M. (2009a). Key concepts in ELT: Innovation in ELT. ELT Journal, 63(4), 397–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b). Planning for educational change: Putting people and their contexts first. Continuum.Google Scholar
(2022). Key concepts in ELT: Innovation in ELT revisited. ELT Journal, 76(2), 272–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar