Cover not available
Part of
Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: Historical perspectives
Edited by Richard Smith and Tim Giesler
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 20] 2023
► pp. 122–136

Chapter 7
Change without innovation?

Language teaching in late 19th-century Germany

| University of Bremen
| University of Bremen
In the context of language education, innovation seems a problematic concept. Although there is no doubt that teaching methods have changed in the 200 or so years that modern foreign languages have been taught in schools, it is usually highly debatable that they were as “new” as claimed when they were introduced. One example is the “Direct” methodology promoted by protagonists of the late 19th-century Reform Movement, which had in fact already been in use before the 1880s – language teachers for girls and for future merchants, for example, had already been focusing on functional aspects at the grassroots level because this served needs in these specific contexts well. They, in turn, had not “invented” these methods but had drawn upon long functional traditions. Secondly, at roughly the same time, modern language teacher education was becoming professionalized and some former teachers went into teacher training or were named to one of the new university chairs for modern foreign language teaching. Justifying and promoting their ideas, they neglected (or simply forgot about) the traditions that had given rise to them.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Background: Claiming “new” methods
  • A multitude of “Direct” methods
  • Languages of theorists and practitioners
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.20.07gie
References (31)
References
Primary sources
Appleton, J. L. (1858). A new and practical method of learning to read, write and speak the English language in a short time (2nd ed.). Schäfer & Koradi.Google Scholar
Boltz, A. (1852). Neuer Lehrgang der Englischen Sprache nach einer neuen, praktischen, analytischen, theoretischen, synthetischen Methode (3 Vols.). R. Gaertner.Google Scholar
Crabb, G. (1837). Neue practische Englische Grammatik (6th ed.). Gebhardt & Reisland.Google Scholar
Fick, J. C. (1800). Theoretisch-praktische Anweisung zur leichtern Erlernung der englischen Sprache. Erster Theil: Praktische Englische Sprachlehre für Deutsche beiderlei Geschlechts. Nach der in Meidingers französischen Grammatik befolgten Methode (3rd ed.). Palm & Enke.Google Scholar
Graeser, K. (1889). Praktischer Lehrgang zur schnellen und leichten Erlernung der Englischen Sprache. Nach Ahn’s Methode. Erster Kursus (15th ed.). Brockhaus.Google Scholar
[KMK] Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2004). Standards der Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Self-published.Google Scholar
Plate, H. (1887). Vollständiger Lehrgang zur leichten, schnellen und gründlichen Erlernung der Englischen Sprache, II: Mittelstufe (48th ed.). Ehlermann.Google Scholar
Reinhardstöttner, K. von. (1868). Über das Studium der modernen Sprachen an den bayerischen Gelehrten-Schulen: Ein Beitrag zu den Ideen über die Reorganisation der Gymnasien. Thomann.Google Scholar
Viëtor, W. (1886). Der Sprachunterricht muß umkehren! Ein Beitrag zur Überbürdungsfrage von Quousque Tandem (2nd ed.). Verlag von Gebr. Henninger.Google Scholar
W[erner, F.] (1864). Der Unterricht im Englischen in der Bürgerschule. In H. Gräfe (Ed.) An das Elternhaus. Mittheilungen aus der Bürgerschule, Töchterbürgerschule und deren Vorbereitungsschulen (pp. 81–85, 3rd year, Vol. 3. 11. 15.02.1864). Gesenius. [Staatarchiv Bremen, Za-231.]Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Albisetti, J. C. (1988). Schooling German girls and women: Secondary and higher education in the nineteenth century. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, H. B. (1983). Training foreign language teachers for learner-centered instruction. Deep structures, surface structures and transformation. In J. E. Alatis, P. Strevens, & H. H. Stern (Eds.), GURT ’83. Applied linguistics and the preparation of second language teachers: Toward a rationale (pp. 19–25). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Penguin.Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (2013). Inside the black box of classroom practice. Change without reform in American education. Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Doff, S. (2002). Englischlernen zwischen Tradition und Innovation: Fremdsprachenunterricht für Mädchen im 19. Jahrhundert. Langenscheidt-Longman.Google Scholar
(2016). Vermittlungsmethoden: Historischer Überblick. In E. Burwitz-Melzer, G. Mehlhorn, C. Riemer, K.-R. Bausch, & H.-J. Krumm (Eds.), Handbuch Fremdsprachenunterricht (6th ed., pp. 320–325). Francke.Google Scholar
(2018). “Let girls chat about the weather and walks”: English language education at girls’ secondary schools in nineteenth-century Germany. In N. McLelland & R. Smith (Eds.), The history of language learning and teaching, Vol. II: 19th–20th century Europe (pp. 87–97). Legenda. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giesler, T. (2018). Die Formation des institutionellen Englischunterrichts. Englisch als erste Fremdsprache in Bremen (1855–1873). WVT.Google Scholar
(2019). Pre-reform professionals: Multilingual Northern German language teachers (ca. 1850–1875). Language & History 62(2), 140–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Start afresh or return? The impact of the Reform Movement on northern German English language teaching. Language & History, 64(3), 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardach-Pinke, I. (1993). Die Gouvernante. Geschichte eines Frauenberufs. Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. & Smith, R. (2002). Introduction to volume III. In A. P. R. Howatt, & R. Smith (Eds.), Modern language teaching. The Reform Movement, Vol. III: Germany and France (pp. ix–xxxviii). Routledge.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R., with H. G. Widdowson. (2004). A history of English language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, D., & Smith, R. (2012). Unpackaging the past: “CLT” through ELTJ keywords. ELT Journal, 66(4), 430–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klippel, F. (1994). Englischlernen im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert: Die Geschichte der Lehrbücher und Unterrichtsmethoden. Nodus.Google Scholar
Nye, D. E. (1994). American technological sublime. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23(4), 589–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleich, M. (2015). Geschichte des internationalen Schülerbriefwechsels. Entstehung und Entwicklung im historischen Kontext von den Anfängen bis zum Ersten Weltkrieg. Waxmann.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. (2011). Language teaching methodology. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 185–199). Routledge.Google Scholar
Tröhler, D. (2011). Languages of education. Protestant legacies, national identities, and global aspirations. Routledge.Google Scholar