References

References

Primary source

19CSC. Dossena, Marina and Richard Dury
compilers). In preparation. A corpus of nineteenth-century Scottish correspondence.

Secondary sources

Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard J. Watts
(eds.) 2015Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Frances
([1973] 1998) Epistolary conventions in the Clift family correspondence. In Mats Rydén, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade and Merja Kytö (eds.), A Reader in Early Modern English, 319–347. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2004“Heaving this importunity”: The survival of opening formulas in letters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Historical Sociolingistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 4, www​.let​.leidenuniv​.nl​/hsl​_shl​/heaving​_this​_importunity​.htm (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
(eds.) 2011Understanding Historical (Im)politeness. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2).Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1995Dimensions of Register Variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Tom M.
2006Clearance and Improvement: Land, power and people in Scotland, 1700–1900. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
2011To the Ends of the Earth, Scotland’s Global Diaspora, 1750–2010. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dierks, Konstantin
2000The familiar letter and social refinement in America, 1750-1800. In David Barton and Nigel Hall (eds.), Letter Writing as a Social Practice, 31–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dossena, Marina
2004Towards a corpus of nineteenth-century Scottish correspondence. Linguistica e Filologia 18. 195–214.Google Scholar
2007“As this leaves me at present” – Formulaic usage, politeness and social proximity in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories from Below (1700–2000), 13–29. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008“Many strange and peculiar affairs”: Description, narration and evaluation in Scottish emigrants’ letters of the nineteenth century. Scottish Language 27. 1–18.Google Scholar
2010Dialect and vernacular features in Late Modern English correspondence: Beginnings of a quest. Brno Studies in English 36(1). 5–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012aThe study of correspondence: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, 13–30. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012bSense and sensibility: Verbal morphosyntax in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters and the intersection of standard and vernacular usage. Token: A Journal of English Linguistics 1. 23–36.Google Scholar
2012c“I write you these few lines”: Metacommunication and pragmatics in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In Busse, Ulrich and Axel Hübler (eds.), Investigations into the Metacommunicative Lexicon of English. A contribution to historical pragmatics, 45–63. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Mixing genres and reinforcing community ties in nineteenth-century Scottish correspondence: Formality, familiarity and religious discourse. In Kopaczyk, Joanna and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Communities of Practice in the History of English, 47–60. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Tales of the New World: The linguistic construction of identity between psychological proximity and geographical distance. In Bamford, Julia, Franca Poppi and Davide Mazzi (eds.), Space, Place and the Discursive Construction of Identity, 239–264. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella
(eds.) 2012Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dury, Richard
2006A corpus of nineteenth-century business correspondence: Methodology of transcription. In Dossena, Marina and Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds.), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical investigations, 193–205. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008Handwriting and the linguistic study of letters. In Dossena, Marina and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and data, 113–135. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan
2002Standard German in the nineteenth century? (Counter-)evidence from the private correspondence of ‘ordinary people’. In Linn, Andrew R. and Nicola McLelland (eds.), Standardization – Studies from the Germanic languages, 43–65. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Private letters as a source for an alternative history of Late Modern German. In Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard J. Watts (eds.), Letter Writing and Language Change, 35–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche
(eds.) 2007Germanic Language Histories from Below (1700–2000). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Charlotte
1972Invisible Immigrants. The adaptation of English and Scottish immigrants in nineteenth-century America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony
2003Letters of the English labouring classes 1800–34 and the English language. In Dossena, Marina and Charles Jones (eds.), Insights into Late Modern English, 265–282. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007‘Lower-order’ letters, schooling and the English language, 1795 to 1834. In Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories from Below (1700–2000), 31–43. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan M.
2002The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A pragmatic approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Epistolary identity: Convention and idiosyncrasy in Late Modern English letters. In Dossena, Marina and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and data, 77–112. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, David
1994Oceans of Consolation: Personal accounts of Irish migration to Australia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, David A.
2005Acts of deceiving and withholding in immigrant letters: Personal identity and self-presentation in personal correspondence. Journal of Social History 39. 315–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Authors of their Lives. The personal correspondence of British immigrants to North America in the nineteenth century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
2011American Immigration: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Robert D.
2005Representations of British Emigration, Colonisation and Settlement. Imagining empire, 1800–1860. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Harper, Marjory
2006Crossing borders: Scottish emigration to Canada. History in Focus11 (Migration), www​.history​.ac​.uk​/ihr​/Focus​/Migration​/articles​/harper​.html (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2011Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson
(eds.) 2001Evaluation in Text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bill
2005Writing back: Welsh emigrants and their correspondence in the nineteenth century. North American Journal of Welsh Studies 5(1). 23–46.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
(eds.) 2008Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2007Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis. In Fitzmaurice, Susan M. and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139–166. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English, 295–310. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, John M.
2010Scotland and Empire: Ethnicity, environment and identity. Northern Scotland 1. 12–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti
2006Dissemination of textual material and second-generation corpora: Finding intertexts in early English medical writing. In Dossena, Marina and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-specific English, 191–205. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno
2012“I will be expecting a letter from you before this reaches you”. A corpus-based study of shall/will variation in Irish English correspondence. In Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, 179–204. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1987 [1989]Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Linda C.
2012Teaching grammar and composition through letter writing in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England”. In Dossena, Marina and Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, 229–250. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Introduction. In Mitchell, Linda C. (ed.) Forms of Address: Five hundred years of letters. Special issue of Huntington Library Quarterly 79(3). 343–344.Google Scholar
Moreton, Emma
2015“I hope you will write”. The function of projection structures in a corpus of nineteenth-century Irish emigrant correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(2). 277–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016“I never could forget my darling mother”. The language of recollection in a corpus of female Irish emigrant correspondence. The History of the Family 21(3). 315–336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
2003Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies 5(2). 265–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
(eds.) 2004Letter Writing. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Robin
2008Lochaber no more – Landscape, emigration and the Scottish artist 1849–1895. Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7/1, www​.c​-artworldwide​.org​/index​.php​/spring08​/111​-lochaber​-no​-more​-landscape​-emigration​-and​-the​-scottish​-artist​-1849​-1895​-by​-robin​-nicholson (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Noonan, Alan J. M.
2011“Oh those long months without a word from home”. Migrant letters from mining frontiers. The Boolean 2011 137–143, http://​publish​.ucc​.ie​/boolean​/2011​/00​/Noonan​/31​/en (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
Oster, Ulrike
2010Using corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analyses: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions? Cognitive Linguistics 21(4). 727–763. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna and Minna Nevala
(eds.) 2005Letters and Letter Writing. Special issue of European Journal of English Studies.Google Scholar
Pipe, Ann
2004Voices from the past: A reconstruction of the Scottish emigrant experience (1830–1856). International Review of Scottish Studies 29. 72–106.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul
2008From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2003Lowth’s language. In Dossena, Marina and Charles Jones (eds.), Insights into Late Modern English, 241–264. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2005Eighteenth-century English letters: In search of the vernacular. Linguistica e Filologia 21. 113–146.Google Scholar
Wal, van der Marijke
2007Eighteenth-century linguistic variation from the perspective of a Dutch diary and a collection of private letters. In Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories from Below (1700–2000), 83–96. Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2007Appraisal. In Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Online, s.v. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins www​.benjamins​.com​/online​/hop (accessed July 2019).Google Scholar
2015The Appraisal Website, http://​www​.grammatics​.com​/appraisal/(accessed July 2019).Google Scholar