Cover not available
Part of
Lifespan Acquisition and Language Change: Historical sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Israel Sanz-Sánchez
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 14] 2024
► pp. 203–233

Chapter 9
Child and adolescent transmission and incrementation in acquisition in historical sociophonetic data from English in Missouri, 1880–2000

ORCID logo | University of Warwick
Phonological conditioning of allophones of /æ/ is typologically important for American Englishes and a site of ongoing sound change. Combining historical and present-day data, this chapter traces productions of /æ/ in the US state of Missouri from the 1880s to 1990s. It reveals a transition to a nasal /æ/ system that progressed via children’s probabilistic calculations, as children initially acquired the /æ/ of their speech community (transmission) and then introduced innovations as they approached adulthood (incrementation). It also posits roots for the actuation of modern-day /æ/-backing in turn-of-the-century associations with high socioeconomic status and/or metropolitan Kansas City, which may have initiated incrementation. These findings highlight the value of historical sociophonetic explorations of sound changes as consequences of cognitive processes of language acquisition.
Keywords: sound change, nasal system, /æ/, trap, pre-nasal, priors, probabilistic, transmission, incrementation, historical sociophonetics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2./æ/ in American Englishes
  • 3.Probabilistic processing of sociophonetic inputs in transmission and incrementation
  • 4.The dataset
  • 5.Transmission and incrementation in multi-generational speech community sound changes
  • 6.Language acquisition and the historical sociolinguistics of /æ/ in Missouri English
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 4 April 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.14.09str
References (63)
References
Archival sources
American English Dialect Recordings, Center for Applied Linguistics Collection, Library of Congress. Project description: [URL]
Arthur B. Church KMBC Radio Collection, Marr Sound Archive, University of Missouri-Kansas City. Project description: [URL]
Kirkwood, Missouri, Oral History Project, State Historical Society of Missouri. Project description: [URL]
Missouri Mule History Project, State Historical Society of Missouri. Project description: [URL]
USS Schley Oral History Project, in the Alex Primm Oral History Collection, State Historical Society of Missouri. Project description: [URL]
Secondary sources
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara (ed.). 2019. The low-back merger shift: Uniting the Canadian vowel shift, the California vowel shift, and short front vowel rotations across North America. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles & Stephanie Strassel. 2000. Short-a in Cincinnati: A change in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 28(2). 108–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Theodore & Lyle Dorsett. 1978. K.C.: A history of Kansas City, Missouri. Boulder, CO: Pruett.Google Scholar
Calenge, Clément. 2006. The package adehabitat for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197(3–4). 516–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, Katie. 2020. (æ)fter the storm: An Examination of the short-a system in Greater New Orleans. Language Variation and Change 32. 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carver, Craig. 1987. American regional dialects. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cournane, Ailís. 2019. A developmental view on incrementation in language change. Theoretical Linguistics 45(3–4). 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek. 2016. Oral histories as a window to sociolinguistic history and language history: Exploring earlier Ontario English with the Farm Work and Farm Life Since 1890 oral history collection. American Speech 91(4). 513–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek, Matt Hunt Gardner, Marisa Brook & Sali Taglimonte. 2019. Peaks and arrowheads of vernacular reorganization. Language Variation and Change 31. 43–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Daniel. 2018. Language variation and change in the geographies of suburbs. New York: New York University PhD dissertation.
ELAN (Version 6.3) [Computer software]. 2022. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. [URL] (15 January 2022).
Faries, Rachel. 1967. A word geography of Missouri. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri PhD dissertation.
Faries, Rachel & Donald Lance. 1993. Regional variation in Missouri. In Timothy Frazer (ed.), “Heartland” English: Variation and transition in the American Midwest, 245–256. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lauren. 2014. The St. Louis corridor: Mixing, competing, and retreating dialects. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. PhD dissertation.
Gibson, Campbell & Kay Jung. 2002. Historical Census statistics on population totals by race, 1790 to 1990, and by Hispanic origin, 1970 to 1990, for the United States, regions, divisions, and states [Working paper 56]. Washington: US Census Bureau. Accessed 13 May 2022.
Gordon, Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury & Peter Trudgill. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2004. The West and Midwest: Phonology. In Bernd Kortmann & Edgar Schneider (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English: A multimedia reference tool, volume 1, Phonology, 338–350. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2006. Tracking the low back merger in Missouri. In Thomas Murray & Beth Lee Simon (eds.), Language variation and change in the American Midland, 57–68. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Christopher Strelluf. 2017. Evidence of American regional dialects in early recordings. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Listening to the past: Audio records of accents of English, 232–256. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddican, Bill, Michael Newman, Cecelia Cutler & Christina Tortora. 2021. Aspects of change in New York City English short-a. Language Variation and Change 33(2). 135–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Erin & Ruth Maddeaux. 2020. /u/-fronting and /æ/-raising in Toronto families. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 25(2). 51–60. [URL]
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2017a. Listening to the past: Audio records of accents of English [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Analysing early audio recordings. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Listening to the past: Audio records of accents of English, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes-Elliott, Sophie. 2021. Calibrate to innovate: Community age vectors and the real time incrementation of language change. Language in Society 50(3). 441–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2015. Quantifying overlap with Bhattacharyya’s affinity. Paper presented at NWAV 44, Toronto, ON. [URL] (15 January 2022).
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2000. Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29(1). 65–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Principles of linguistic change, volume 3: Cultural and cognitive factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Sabriya Fisher, Duna Gylfadottír, Anita Henderson & Betsy Sneller. 2016. Competing systems in Philadelphia phonology. Language Variation and Change 28(3). 273–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Ingrid Rosenfelder & Josef Fruehwald. 2013. One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language 89(1). 30–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Malcah Yaeger & Richard Steiner. 1972. A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Lenzo, Kevin. 2014. The CMU pronouncing dictionary v. 0.7b. [URL]. (Feb. 7 2022)
Lobanov, Boris. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49(2). 606–608. DOI logo
Nakao, Keiko & Judith Treas. 1994. Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology 24(1). 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesbitt, Monica, Suzanne Evans Wagner & Alexander Mason. 2019. A tale of two shifts: Movement toward the low-back-merger shift in Lansing, Michigan. In Kara Becker (ed.), The low-back merger shift: Uniting the Canadian vowel shift, the California vowel shift, and short front vowel rotations across North America, 144–165. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Arvilla. 1980. Factors controlling the acquisition of the Philadelphia dialect by out-of-state children. In William Labov (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 143–178. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2–3). 115–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL]
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Josef Fruehwald, Keelan Evanini, Scott Seyfarth, Kyle Gorman, Hilary Prichard & Jiahong Yuan. 2014. FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) Program Suite v1.2.2 10.5281/zenodo.22281.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian & Hélène Blondeau. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3). 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James & Laurence Kenny. 2013. Revisiting transmission and diffusion: An agent-based model of vowel chain shifts across large communities. Language Variation and Change 25. 119–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strelluf, Christopher. 2016. Overlap among back vowels before /l/ in Kansas City. Language Variation and Change 28. 379–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Speaking from the Heartland: The Midland vowel system of Kansas City. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 2019a. Structural and social correlations with the Low-Back Merger Shift in a US Midland community. In Kara Becker (ed.), The Low-Back Merger Shift: Uniting the Canadian Vowel Shift, the California Vowel Shift, and short front vowel rotations across North America, 120–143. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
. 2019b. Machine-automated vowel measurement, old sound recordings, and error-correction procedures. Presented at the First Annual Meeting of the North American Research Network in Historical Sociolinguistics, New York, USA.
Strelluf, Christopher & Matthew Gordon. 2024. The origins of Missouri English: A historical sociophonetic analysis. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1). 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24. 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thiel, Anja & Aaron Dinkin. 2020. Escaping the TRAP: Losing the Northern Cities Shift in real time. Language Variation and Change 32. 373–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik. 2019. Innovations in sociophonetics. In William Katz & Peter Assmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics, 448–472. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tukey, John. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556–1559.Google Scholar