Letters as Loot

A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch

Authors

Gijsbert Rutten | Leiden University

Marijke J. van der Wal | Leiden University

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027200815 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

e-Book – Open Access Download from our e-platform

ISBN 9789027269577

The study of letter writing is at the heart of the historical-sociolinguistic enterprise. Private letters, in particular, offer an unprecedented view on language history. This book presents an in-depth study of the language of letters focussing on a unique collection of Dutch private letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, which comprises letters from the lower, middle and upper ranks, written by men as well as women.

The book discusses the key issues of formulaic language and the degree of orality of private letters, it questions the importance of letter-writing manuals, and reveals remarkable patterns of social, regional and gender variation in a wide range of linguistic features. Arguing for writing experience as an important factor in historical linguistics generally, the book offers numerous new perspectives on the history of Dutch.

The monograph is of interest to a wide readership, ranging from scholars of historical linguistics, sociolinguistics, Germanic linguistics, sociology and social history to (advanced) graduate and postgraduate students in courses on language variation and change.

[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 2] 2014. xiii, 426 pp.

Publishing status: Available

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.2

Table of Contents

Preface and acknowledgements | pp. xi–xiv

Chapter 1. Letters as Loot: A historical-sociolinguistic challenge | pp. 1–18

Chapter 2. Sounds and signs: From local to supralocal usage | pp. 19–74

Chapter 3. Epistolary formulae: Functions and text composition | pp. 75–128

Chapter 4. Variation and change in formulaic language | pp. 129–172

Chapter 5. Detailing the writing process: Formulaic language, social and professional writers, and the influence of letter-writing manuals | pp. 173–202

Chapter 6. Forms of address | pp. 203–246

Chapter 7. Clause chaining between spoken and written language | pp. 247–288

Chapter 8. Variation and change in the relative clause | pp. 289–322

Chapter 9. Apocope of final schwa | pp. 323–362

Chapter 10. Clausal and local negation | pp. 363–392

Chapter 11. Harvesting: Reflection and evaluation | pp. 393–408

References

Index | pp. 425–246

“This book makes an original and worthwhile contribution to the study of the development of language in a social and historical context. The analyses are undertaken with exemplary thoroughness, presented with copious detail and compared with studies in other European languages.”

Martin Durrell, Manchester

“Drawing on unique source material and presenting detailed case studies of a variety of features from seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch, this well-written and important study of private letters from writers of all social classes and different geographical backgrounds offers an entirely new perspective on the history of Dutch.”

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Leiden

“[A] rich, nuanced and substantial contribution to the history of Dutch, and the field of historical sociolinguistics more generally. As a text, it works as a reference monograph; of interest to researchers of specific changes in the Dutch language, but also for scholars of other languages or periods seeking guidance on methodological approach, or a theoretical model. [...] The book is a testament to a treasure trove of letters, newly discovered, that offer a richness of descriptive and interpretative sociolinguistic insights.”

Mel Evans, University of Leicester, in Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:1 (2017)

“The Letters as Loot project has done wonderful work in creating this rich sociolinguistic corpus. The authors have made the most of their dataset with their selection of research topics, and sociolinguistic research in other languages is often referred to. The attention to detail and the meticulousness of research throughout this excellent book are truly impressive, and the analysis is highly satisfying in its step-by-step pursuit for an overarching synthesis. [...] As a historical sociolinguist whose field is eighteenth-century English, I will certainly revisit and make use of the findings presented here.”

Anni Sairio, University of Helsinki, in Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2019

Cited by

Cited by 27 other publications

Ahrendt, Rebekah & David Van der Linden

2017. The Postmasters' Piggy Bank. French Historical Studies 40:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy

2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization,

Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo

2016. Historical sociolinguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics,

2022. Historical sociolinguistics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 756 ff.

De Smet, Isabeau & Freek Van de Velde

2020. Semantic differences between strong and weak verb forms in Dutch. Cognitive Linguistics 31:3 ► pp. 393 ff.

Dollinger, Stefan

2019. Chapter 3. ‘I hope you will excuse my bad writing’. In Keeping in Touch [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 10],

Elspaß, Stephan

2021. Language Standardization in a View ‘from Below’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization, ► pp. 93 ff.

Girininkaitė, Veronika

2020. Code-Switching in the Letters of Vilnius University Professors at the End of the 18th century. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14 ► pp. 148 ff.

Graber, Kathryn E.

2015. On the Disassembly Line: Linguistic Anthropology in 2014. American Anthropologist 117:2 ► pp. 350 ff.

Große, Sybille & Lena Sowada

2020. Socialisation écrite et rédaction épistolaire de scripteurs moins expérimentés – lettres des soldats de la Grande Guerre. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1 ► pp. 82 ff.

Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel

2022. Mel Evans: Royal voices: Language and power in Tudor England. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:1 ► pp. 189 ff.

Hickey, Raymond

2019. Chapter 1. Mining emigrant correspondence for linguistic insights. In Keeping in Touch [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 10],

Kaislaniemi, Samuli, Mel Evans, Teo Juvonen & Anni Sairio

2017. “A graphic system which leads its own linguistic life”?. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 187 ff.

Krogull, Andreas

2021. Rethinking Historical Multilingualism and Language Contact ‘from Below’. Evidence from the Dutch-German Borderlands in the Long Nineteenth Century. Dutch Crossing 45:2 ► pp. 147 ff.

Krogull, Andreas & Gijsbert Rutten

2021. Reviving the genitive. Prescription and practice in the Netherlands (1770–1840). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 7:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Krogull, Andreas, Gijsbert Rutten & Marijke J. van der Wal

2017. Relativisation in Dutch diaries, private letters and newspapers (1770–1840). In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 157 ff.

Marcus, Imogen

2018. Conclusion. In The Linguistics of Spoken Communication in Early Modern English Writing, ► pp. 321 ff.

Meluzzi, Chiara

2022. Farewells and language usage: Multilingual practices in Bolzano merchants’ documents. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 29 ► pp. 219 ff.

Rutten, Gijsbert

2016. Historicizing diaglossia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:1 ► pp. 6 ff.

Rutten, Gijsbert, Andreas Krogull & Bob Schoemaker

2020. Implementation and acceptance of national language policy: the case of Dutch (1750–1850). Language Policy 19:2 ► pp. 259 ff.

Rutten, Gijsbert & Rik Vosters

2021. Language Standardization ‘from Above’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization, ► pp. 65 ff.

Säily, Tanja, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin & Anita Auer

2017. The future of historical sociolinguistics?. In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7], ► pp. 1 ff.

van der Wal, Marijke

2018. Early Modern migrants in a language contact setting: Characteristics of the Dutch Heusch correspondence (1664–1665) . Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4:2 ► pp. 253 ff.

2021. The black box of delegated writing: Early Modern scribes and female literacy in The Netherlands. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 7:2 ► pp. 303 ff.

Włodarczyk, Matylda

2017. Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard Watts (eds). 2015.Letter Writing and Language Change. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 142 ff.

[no author supplied]

2018. Patterns of Change in 18th-century English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 8],

2022. Sociolinguistic Variation in Old English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 13],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata